Development and Validation of Perception of Seating Ergonomics Questionnaire: A Study on Klang Valley Drivers in Malaysia

  1. International Ergonomics Association. What is ergonomics (HFE)? Geneva: International Ergonomics Association.

  2. Khan Su, Khalifah ZB, Munir Y, et al. Driving behaviours, traffic risk and road safety: Comparative study between Malaysia and Singapore. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2015; 22 (4): 359-367. DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2014.925938

  3. Census and Economic Information Center. Malaysia Number of Registered Vehicles. Kuala Lumpur: Census and Economic Information Center; 2021.

  4. Masuri MG, Mohd Asib NA, Dahlan A, et al. Human Factors and Attitude towards Safe Driving Scale among Young Adults in Malaysia. E-BPJ. 2019; 4 (11): 203-209.

  5. Gowtham S, Ramnaath M, Sudharsan S, et al. Seating comfort analysis: A virtual ergonomics study of bus drivers in private transportation. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 2020; 912: 022018.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/912/2/022018

  6. Ho GW. Examining Perceptions and Attitudes. West J Nurs Res. 2017; 39 (5): 674-689. DOI: 10.1177/0193945916661302

  7. Yitayal MM, Ayhualem S, Fiseha B, et al. Occupational lower back pain and associated factors among taxi drivers in Mekelle City, North Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022; 28 (4): 2046-2051. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1952773

  8. AL-Dubai SAR, Qureshi AM, Ismail NH, et al. Prevalence and determinants of low back pain among taxi drivers in Malaysia. A cross sectional study. J Adv Med Res. 2012; 2 (4): 129-143.

  9. Mohamad D, Deros BM, Daruis DD, et al. Comfortable driver's car seat dimensions based on Malaysian anthropometrics data. Iranian J Public Health. 2016; 45 (Supple 1): 106-113.

  10. Wong C, Leland NE. Applying the Person-Environment-Occupation Model to improve dementia care. North Bethesda, MA: American Occupational Therapy Association; 2018.

  11. Hutchinson C, Berndt A, Gilbert-Hunt S, et al. Modified motor vehicles: The experiences of drivers with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2020; 42 (21): 3043-3051. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1583778

  12. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. Occupational Safety and Health in Malaysia: Securing the Future. Selangor: National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health; 2021.

  13. Social Security Organization. Annual Report 2019. Kuala Lumpur: Social Security Organization; 2019.

  14. Department of Statisctics Malaysia. Big Data Analytics: National Occupational Accident and Disease Statistics 2021. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Economy; 2022.

  15. Pickard O, Burton P, Yamada H, et al. Musculoskeletal Disorders Associated with Occupational Driving: A Systematic Review Spanning 2006-2021. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19 (11): 6837. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116837

  16. Ikart EM. Survey questionnaire survey pretesting method: An evaluation of survey questionnaire via expert reviews technique. Asian J Soc Sci Stud. 2019; 4 (2). DOI: 10.20849/ajsss.v4i2.565

  17. Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, et al. Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. J Caring Sci. 2015; 4 (2): 165-78. DOI: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017

  18. Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Educ Med J. 2019; 11 (2): 49–54.

DOI: 10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

  19. O'Cathain A, Hoddinott P, Lewin S, et al. Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: Guidance for researchers. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015; 1: 32. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-015-0026-y

  20. Beavers AS, Lounsbury JW, Richards JK, et al. Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2013; 18. DOI: 10.7275/qv2q-rk76

  21. Tran TCT, Nguyen NT. Identify factors affecting business efficiency of small and medium enterprises (SMEs): Evidence from Vietnam. Manag Sci Lett. 2019; 9 (12): 1987-1998. DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.007

  22. Awang Z. Structural equation modeling using AMOS Graphic. Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan: UiTM Press; 2012.

  23. Sirajudeen MS, Pillai PS. Test-retest reliability of a questionnaire to assess the ergonomic knowledge of computer professionals. Int J Health Rehab Sci. 2015; 4 (4): 239-243. DOI: 10.5455/ijhrs.000000096

  24. Lombard K, Nolan C, Heron E. Refining the psychometric properties of the Trinity Student Occupational Performance Profile–A self-report measure of occupational performance difficulties within the student role. Brit J Occup Ther. 2022: 03080226221107762. DOI: 10.1177/03080226221107762

  25. Taherdoost H, Sahibuddin S, Jalaliyoon N. Exploratory factor analysis; Concepts and theory. Adv Appl Pure Math. 2022; 27: 375-382.

  26. Taber KS. The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018; 48: 1273-1296. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

  27. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15 (2): 155-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

  28. Coluzzi P. Language planning for Malay in Malaysia: A case of failure or success? Int J Sociol Lang. 2017; 244: 17-38. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl-2016-0055

  29. Wollter Bergman M, Berlin C, Babapour Chafi M, et al. Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands-Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18 (23): 12282. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312282

  30. Ge Y, Sheng B, Qu W, et al. Differences in visual-spatial working memory and driving behavior between morning-type and evening-type drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2020; 136: 105402. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105402

  31. Deng M, Wu F, Gu X, et al. A comparison of visual ability and its importance awareness between novice and experienced drivers. Int J Ind Ergon. 2021; 83: 103141. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103141

  32. Karali S, Gyi DE, Mansfield NJ. Driving a better driving experience: A questionnaire survey of older compared with younger drivers. Ergonomics. 2017; 60 (4): 533-540. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1182648

  33. Xu J, Liu J, Sun X, et al. The relationship between driving skill and driving behavior: Psychometric adaptation of the Driver Skill Inventory in China. Accid Anal Prev. 2018; 120: 92-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.032

  34. Chihuri S, Mielenz TJ, DiMaggio CJ, et al. Driving Cessation and Health Outcomes in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016; 64 (2): 332-341. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13931

  35. Hughes BP, Anund A, Falkmer T. A comprehensive conceptual framework for road safety strategies. Accid Anal Prev. 2016; 90: 13-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.01.017

  36. Hakim S, Mohsen A. Work-related and ergonomic risk factors associated with low back pain among bus drivers. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2017; 92 (3): 195-201.

  37. Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2016; 5 (1): 1-4. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif