World Health Organization. Global health estimates: life expectancy and leading causes of death and disability, 2022. Available from URL: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates (accessed December 2022).

Dornbos D 3rd, Arthur AS. Current state of the art in endovascular stroke treatment. Neurol Clin 2022; 40: 309–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2021.11.008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

American Society of Anesthesiologists’. Continuum of depth of sedation: definition of general anesthesia and levels of sedation/analgesia, 2019. Available from URL: https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/continuum-of-depth-of-sedation-definition-of-general-anesthesia-and-levels-of-sedationanalgesia (accessed December 2022).

Bai X, Zhang X, Wang T, et al. General anesthesia versus conscious sedation for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 86: 10–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2021.01.012

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Campbell D, Diprose WK, Deng C, Barber PA. General anesthesia versus conscious sedation in endovascular thrombectomy for stroke: a meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2021; 33: 21–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ana.0000000000000646

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schönenberger S, Hendén PL, Simonsen CZ, et al. Association of general anesthesia vs procedural sedation with functional outcome among patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2019; 322: 1283–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.11455

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, Jia L, Fang F, Ma L, Cai B, Faramand A. General anesthesia versus conscious sedation for intracranial mechanical thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8: e011754. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.118.011754

Lee CW, Chang YP, Huang YT, et al. General anesthesia but not conscious sedation improves functional outcome in patients receiving endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and trial sequence analysis. Front Neurol 2022; 13: 1017098. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1017098

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Campbell D, Butler E, Barber PA. End the confusion: general anaesthesia improves patient outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy. Br J Anaesth 2022; 129: 461–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.06.018

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maurice A, Eugène F, Ronzière T, et al. General anesthesia versus sedation, both with hemodynamic control, during intraarterial treatment for stroke: the GASS randomized trial. Anesthesiology 2022; 136: 567–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000004142

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chabanne R, Geeraerts T, Begard M, et al. Procedural sedation versus general anesthesia in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion thrombectomy: the Anesthesia Management in Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke (AMETIS) randomized controlled trial (conference abstract). Eur Stroke J 2022; 7: 3–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873221087559

Article  Google Scholar 

Liang F, Wu Y, Wang X, et al. General anesthesia vs conscious sedation for endovascular treatment in patients with posterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: an exploratory randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2022; e223018. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.3018

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sterne JA, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366: l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 924–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 10: ED000142. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ed000142

Röver C, Knapp G, Friede T. Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015; 15: 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0091-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

IntHout J, Ioannidis JP, Borm GF. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14: 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-25

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Rucker G. Meta-Analysis with R, 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015.

Book  Google Scholar 

Veroniki AA, Jackson D, Viechtbauer W, et al. Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis. Res Synth Methods 2016; 7: 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1164

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Cassai A, Pasin L, Boscolo A, Salvago M, Navalesi P. Trial sequential analysis: plain and simple. Korean J Anesthesiol 2021; 74: 363–5. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.20637

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Broderick JP, Adeoye O, Elm J. Evolution of the modified Rankin scale and its use in future stroke trials. Stroke 2017; 48: 2007–12. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.117.017866

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bath PM, Lees KR, Schellinger PD, et al. Statistical analysis of the primary outcome in acute stroke trials. Stroke 2012; 43: 1171–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.111.641456

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Löwhagen Hendén P, Rentzos A, Karlsson JE, et al. General anesthesia versus conscious sedation for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: the AnStroke trial (anesthesia during stroke). Stroke 2017; 48: 1601–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.117.016554

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schönenberger S, Uhlmann L, Hacke W, et al. Effect of conscious sedation vs general anesthesia on early neurological improvement among patients with ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 316: 1986–96. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.16623

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Simonsen CZ, Yoo AJ, Sørensen LH, et al. Effect of general anesthesia and conscious sedation during endovascular therapy on infarct growth and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2018; 75: 470–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4474

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sun J, Liang F, Wu Y, et al. Choice of Anesthesia for EndoVAScular treatment of acute ischemic stroke (CANVAS): results of the CANVAS pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2020; 32: 41–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ana.0000000000000567

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ren C, Xu G, Liu Y, Liu G, Wang J, Gao J. Effect of conscious sedation vs. general anesthesia on outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Front Neurol 2020; 11: 170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00170

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hu G, Shi Z, Li B, Shao W, Xu B. General anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care during endovascular therapy for vertebrobasilar stroke. Am J Transl Res 2021; 13: 1558–67.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2019; 50: e344–418. https://doi.org/10.1161/str.0000000000000211

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tosello R, Riera R, Tosello G, et al. Type of anaesthesia for acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 7: CD013690. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd013690.pub2

Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Rabinstein AA, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular acute ischemic stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 525–9. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a4159

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brinjikji W, Pasternak J, Murad MH, et al. Anesthesia-related outcomes for endovascular stroke revascularization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2017; 48: 2784–91. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.117.017786

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Butt W, Dhillon PS, Podlasek A, et al. Local anesthesia as a distinct comparator versus conscious sedation and general anesthesia in endovascular stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2022; 14: 221–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017360

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ilyas A, Chen C-J, Ding D, et al. Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke under general anesthesia versus conscious sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2018; 112: e355–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.049

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jing R, Dai HJ, Lin F, Ge WY, Pan LH. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia for patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2318489

Article  Google Scholar 

Wan TF, Zhang JR, Liu L. Effect of general anesthesia vs. conscious sedation on the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients after endovascular therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Front Neurol 2019; 10: 1131. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01131

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gravel G, Boulouis G, Benhassen W, et al. Anaesthetic management during intracranial mechanical thrombectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of current data. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019; 90: 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2018-318549

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim C, Kim SE, Jeon JP. Influence of anesthesia type on outcomes after endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke: meta-analysis. Neurointervention 2019; 14: 17–26. https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2019.00045

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li X, Hu Z, Li Q, et al. Anesthesia for endovascular treatment in anterior circulation stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav 2019; 9: e01178. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1178

Article  PubMed