Ma, L. et al. Fundamental understanding and material challenges in rechargeable nonaqueous Li–O2 batteries: recent progress and perspective. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1800348 (2018).
Liu, T. et al. Current challenges and routes forward for nonaqueous lithium–air batteries. Chem. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00545 (2020).
Kwak, W. J. et al. Lithium–oxygen batteries and related systems: potential, status, and future. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 120, 6626–6683 (2020).
Wang, D., Mu, X., He, P. & Zhou, H. Materials for advanced Li–O2 batteries: explorations, challenges and prospects. Mater. Today 26, 87–99 (2019).
Viswanathan, V. et al. Electrical conductivity in Li2O2 and its role in determining capacity limitations in non-aqueous Li–O2 batteries. J. Chem. Phys. 135, 214704 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gallant, B. M. et al. Influence of Li2O2 morphology on oxygen reduction and evolution kinetics in Li–O2 batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 2518–2528 (2013).
Li, F. et al. Superior performance of a Li–O2 battery with metallic RuO2 hollow spheres as the carbon-free cathode. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500294 (2015).
Tan, P., Wei, Z. H., Shyy, W., Zhao, T. S. & Zhu, X. B. A nano-structured RuO2/NiO cathode enables the operation of non-aqueous lithium–air batteries in ambient air. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1783–1793 (2016).
Park, J.-B., Lee, S. H., Jung, H.-G., Aurbach, D. & Sun, Y.-K. Redox mediators for Li–O2 batteries: status and perspectives. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201704162 (2018).
McCloskey, B. D. & Addison, D. A viewpoint on heterogeneous electrocatalysis and redox mediation in nonaqueous Li–O2 batteries. ACS Catal. 7, 772–778 (2017).
Liu, T. et al. The effect of water on quinone redox mediators in nonaqueous Li–O2 batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 1428–1437 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lacey, M. J., Frith, J. T. & Owen, J. R. A redox shuttle to facilitate oxygen reduction in the lithium air battery. Electrochem. Commun. 26, 74–76 (2013).
Chase, G. et al. Soluble oxygen evolving catalysts for rechargeable metal–air batteries. WO patent 2,011,133 (2011).
Bergner, B. J., Schürmann, A., Peppler, K., Garsuch, A. & Janek, J. TEMPO: a mobile catalyst for rechargeable Li–O2 batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15054–15064 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Freunberger, S. A., Peng, Z., Fontaine, O. & Bruce, P. G. Charging a Li–O2 battery using a redox mediator. Nat. Chem. 5, 489–494 (2013).
Lim, H.-D. et al. Rational design of redox mediators for advanced Li–O2 batteries. Nat. Energy 1, 16066 (2016).
Kundu, D., Black, R., Adams, B. & Nazar, L. F. A highly active low voltage redox mediator for enhanced rechargeability of lithium–oxygen batteries. ACS Cent. Sci. 1, 510–515 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, T., Liao, K., He, P. & Zhou, H. A self-defense redox mediator for efficient lithium–O2 batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1024–1030 (2016).
Yao, K. P. C. et al. Utilization of cobalt bis(terpyridine) metal complex as soluble redox, ediator in Li–O2 batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 16290–16297 (2016).
Mourad, E. et al. Singlet oxygen from cation driven superoxide disproportionation and consequences for aprotic metal–O2 batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2, 2559–2568 (2019).
Mahne, N. et al. Singlet oxygen generation as a major cause for parasitic reactions during cycling of aprotic lithium–oxygen batteries. Nat. Energy 2, 17036 (2017).
Schurmann, A., Luerßen, B., Mollenhauer, D., Janek, J. & Der, D. S. Singlet oxygen in electrochemical cells: a critical review of literature and theory. Chem. Rev. 121, 12445–12464 (2021).
Wandt, J., Jakes, P., Granwehr, J., Gasteiger, H. A. & Eichel, R. A. Singlet oxygen formation during the charging process of an aprotic lithium–oxygen battery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 6892–6895 (2016).
Bawol, P. P. et al. A new thin layer cell for battery related DEMS-experiments: the activity of redox mediators in the Li–O2 cell. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 21447–21456 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ko, Y. et al. A comparative kinetic study of redox mediators for high-power lithium–oxygen batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 6491–6498 (2019).
Liang, Z., Zou, Q., Xie, J. & Lu, Y.-C. Suppressing singlet oxygen generation in lithium–oxygen batteries with redox mediators. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 2870–2877 (2020).
Chen, Y., Gao, X., Johnson, L. R. & Bruce, P. G. Kinetics of lithium peroxide oxidation by redox mediators and consequences for the lithium–oxygen cell. Nat. Commun. 9, 767 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Petit, Y. K. et al. Mechanism of mediated alkali peroxide oxidation and triplet versus singlet oxygen formation. Nat. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00643-z (2021).
Kwak, W. J. et al. Oxidation stability of organic redox mediators as mobile catalysts in lithium–oxygen batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 2122–2129 (2020).
Laoire, C. O., Mukerjee, S., Abraham, K. M., Plichta, E. J. & Hendrickson, M. A. Influence of nonaqueous solvents on the electrochemistry of oxygen in the rechargeable lithium–air battery. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 9178–9186 (2010).
Bryantsev, V. S., Blanco, M. & Faglioni, F. Stability of lithium superoxide LiO2 in the gas phase: computational study of dimerization and disproportionation reactions. J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 8165–8169 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Unwin, P. R. & Bard, A. J. Scanning electrochemical microscopy. 9. Theory and application of the feedback mode to the measurement of following chemical reaction rates in electrode processes. J. Phys. Chem. 95, 7814–7824 (1991).
Arroyo-Currás, N. & Bard, A. J. Iridium oxidation as observed by surface interrogation scanning electrochemical microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 8147–8154 (2015).
Rodríguez-López, J., Minguzzi, A. & Bard, A. J. Reaction of various reductants with oxide films on Pt electrodes as studied by the surface interrogation mode of scanning electrochemical microscopy (SI-SECM): possible validity of a Marcus relationship. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 18645–18655 (2010).
Miller, J. R., Beitz, J. V. & Huddleston, R. K. Effect of free energy on rates of electron transfer between molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 5057–5068 (1984).
Krueger, B., Rucker, K. K. & Wittstock, G. Redox mediators for faster lithium peroxide oxidation in a lithium–oxygen cell: a scanning electrochemical microscopy study. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 5, 3724–3733 (2022).
Lefrou, C. & Cornut, R. Analytical expressions for quantitative scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). Chemphyschem 11, 547–556 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cornut, R. & Lefrou, C. New analytical approximation of feedback approach curves with a microdisk SECM tip and irreversible kinetic reaction at the substrate. J. Electroanal. Chem. 621, 178–184 (2008).
Marcus, R. A. On the theory of electron-transfer reactions. VI. Unified treatment for homogeneous and electrode reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 43, 679–701 (1965).
Nakabayashi, S., Itoh, K., Fujishima, A. & Honda, K. Electron transfer rates in highly exothermic reactions on semiconductor–electrolyte interfaces, and the deuterium isotope effect. J. Phys. Chem. 87, 5301–5303 (1983).
Hamann, T. W., Gstrein, F., Brunschwig, B. S. & Lewis, N. S. Measurement of the free-energy dependence of interfacial charge-transfer rate constants using ZnO/H2O semiconductor/liquid contacts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 7815–7824 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gerbig, O., Merkle, R. & Maier, J. Electron and ion transport in Li2O2. Adv. Mater. 25, 3129–3133 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Barthel, J. & Feuerlein, F. Dielectric properties of propylene carbonate-1,2-dimethoxyethane mixtures and their electrolyte solutions of NaClO4 and Bu4NClO4. Z. Phys. Chem. 148, 157–170 (1986).
Meini, S. et al. Rechargeability of Li–air cathodes pre-filled with discharge products using an ether-based electrolyte solution: implications for cycle-life of Li–air cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 11478–11493 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McCloskey, B. D. et al. Combining accurate O2 and Li2O2 assays to separate discharge and charge stability limitations in nonaqueous Li–O2 batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 2989–2993 (2013).
留言 (0)