Konieczny MR, Hs S, Krauspe Rd (2012) Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 7:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0457-4

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Weinstein SLD, Dolan LAP, Cheng JCYMD, Danielsson AMD, Morcuende JAMD (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371:1527–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Post M, Verdun S, Roussouly P, Abelin-Genevois K (2019) New sagittal classification of AIS: validation by 3D characterization. Eur Spine J 28:551–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5819-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pasha S, Baldwin K (2018) Are we simplifying balance evaluation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 51:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.11.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kotwicki T (2008) Evaluation of scoliosis today: examination, X-rays and beyond. Disabil Rehabil 30:742–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280801889519

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Addai D, Zarkos J, Bowey AJ (2020) Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Childs Nerv Syst 36:1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04608-4

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB (2013) Effects of Bracing in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis. N Engl J Med 369:1512–1521. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1307337

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wong LPK, Cheung PWH, Cheung JPY (2022) Curve type, flexibility, correction, and rotation are predictors of curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing conservative treatment : a systematic review. Bone Joint J 104–B:424–432. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.104B4.BJJ-2021-1677.R1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Asher MA, Burton DC (2006) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis 1:2–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-1-2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Burton DC, Sama AA, Asher MA, Burke SW, Boachie-Adjei O, Huang RC, Green DW, Rawlins BA (2005) The treatment of large (>70 degrees) thoracic idiopathic scoliosis curves with posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis: when is anterior release indicated? Spine 30:1979–1984. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000176196.94565.d6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Green DW, Lawhorne TW, Widmann RF, Kepler CK, Ahern C, Mintz DN, Rawlins BA, Burke SW, Boachie-Adjei O (2011) Long-term magnetic resonance imaging follow-up demonstrates minimal transitional level lumbar disc degeneration after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 36:1948–1954. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ff1ea9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kepler CK, Meredith DS, Green DW, Widmann RF (2012) Long-term outcomes after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Curr Opin Pediatr 24:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834ec982

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Danielsson AJ, Romberg K, Nachemson AL (2006) Spinal range of motion, muscle endurance, and back pain and function at least 20 years after fusion or brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : A case-control study. Spine 31:275–283. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000197652.52890.71

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

FDA (2022) Pediatric Advisory Committee. FDA Executive Summary H190005 The TetherTM–Vertebral Body Tethering System. https://www.fda.gov/media/157897/download. Accessed 10 June 2022

Newton PO (2020) Spinal growth tethering: indications and limits. Ann Transl Med 8:27. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.12.159

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wong H-K, Ruiz JNM, Newton PO, Gabriel Liu K-P (2019) Non-fusion surgical correction of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis using a novel, braided vertebral body tethering device: minimum follow-up of 4 years. JB JS Open Access 4:e0026–e0026. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00026

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

SIGN (2012) Scottish Intercollegiate Network Guidelines. Case Control Studies. Edinburgh: SIGN. http://www.sign.ac.uk. Accessed 10 August 2022

SIGN (2012) Scottish Intercollegiate Network Guidelines. Cohort studies. Edinburgh: SIGN. http://www.sign.ac.uk. Accessed 10 August 2022

Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, deBeer H, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Meerpohl J, Dahm P, Schünemann HJ (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64:383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt GH (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:401–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, Coello PA, Guyatt GH, Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Akl EA, Hazlewood G, Pardo-Hernandez H, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Qaseem A, Williams JW, Tugwell P, Flottorp S, Chang Y, Zhang Y, Mustafa RA, Rojas MX, Xie F, Schünemann HJ (2019) GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains. J Clin Epidemiol 111:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt GH, Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Akl EA, Hazlewood G, Pardo-Hernandez H, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Qaseem A, Williams JW, Tugwell P, Flottorp S, Chang Y, Zhang Y, Mustafa RA, Rojas MX, Schünemann HJ (2019) GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—risk of bias and indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol 111:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.013

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Djulbegovic B, Atkins D, Falck-Ytter Y, Williams JW, Meerpohl J, Norris SL, Akl EA, Schünemann HJ (2011) GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1277–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, Atkins D, Kunz R, Brozek J, Montori V, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Dahm P, Meerpohl J, Vist G, Berliner E, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Murad MH, Schünemann HJ (2011) GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1311–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buyuk AF, Milbrandt TA, Mathew SE, Larson AN (2021) Measurable thoracic motion remains at 1 year following anterior vertebral body tethering, with sagittal motion greater than coronal motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 103:2299–2305. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.20.01533

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjönen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Helenius M, Poussa M (2002) Comparison of long-term functional and radiologic outcomes after Harrington instrumentation and spondylodesis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of 78 patients. Spine 27:176–180. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200201150-00010

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Holewijn RM, Kingma I, De Kleuver M, Keijsers NLW (2018) Posterior spinal surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis does not induce compensatory increases in adjacent segment motion: a prospective gait analysis study. Global Spine J 8:43S-44S. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218771030

Article  Google Scholar 

Hosseini P, Nnadi C, Rehák Ľ, Repko M, Grevitt M, Aydinli U, Carl A, Pawelek J, Crandall D, Akbarnia BA (2016) Analysis of segmental mobility following a novel posterior apical short-segment correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 41:E1223-e1229. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001607

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kakar RS, Li Y, Brown CN, Oswald TS, Simpson KJ (2019) Spine and lower extremity kinematics exhibited during running by adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with spinal fusion. Spine Deform 7:254–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.08.015

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pahys JM, Samdani AF, Hwang SW, Warshauer S, Gaughan JP, Chafetz RS (2022) Trunk range of motion and patient outcomes after anterior vertebral body tethering versus posterior spinal fusion: comparison using computerized 3D motion capture technology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00992

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pehlivanoglu T, Oltulu I, Erdag Y, Akturk UD, Korkmaz E, Yildirim E, Sarioglu E, Ofluoglu E, Aydogan M (2021) Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes of vertebral body tethering to posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and evaluation of quality of life: preliminary results. Spine Deform 9:1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00323-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Segal DN, Grabel ZJ, Konopka JA, Boissonneault AR, Yoon E, Bastrom TP, Flynn JM, Fletcher ND (2019) Fusions ending at the thoracolumbar junction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of lower instrumented vertebrae. Spine Deform. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2019.05.006

Article  Google Scholar 

Turan K, Kara GK, Camurcu Y, Kizilay YO, Uysal Y, Sahin E, Aydinli U (2022) Cervical and thoracic/lumbar motion and muscle strength in surgically treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.3233/bmr-210303

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Udoekwere UI, Krzak JJ, Graf A, Hassani S, Tarima S, Riordan M, Sturm PF, Hammerberg KW, Gupta P, Anissipour AK, Harris GF (2014) Effect of lowest instrumented vertebra on trunk mobility in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing a posterior spinal fusion. Spine Deform 2:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.04.006

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wong-Chung D, Schimmel JJP, de Kleuver M, Keijsers NLW (2018) Asymmetrical trunk movement during walking improved to normal range at 3 months after corrective posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 27:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5369-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alkhalife YI, Padhye KP, El-Hawary R (2019) New technologies in pediatric spine surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 50:57–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2018.08.014

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Newton PO, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP, Kluck DG, Saito W, Yaszay B (2020) Anterior spinal growth modulation in skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison with posterior spinal fusion at 2 to 5 years postoperatively. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:769–777. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01176