Objective: To describe the data obtained about diagnoses of anxiety disorders from the Mediktor database to reveal the relationship with the current scientific evidence. Methods: This retrospective observational study uses secondary data obtained from the Mediktor database and evaluated age, sex, and the most frequent reason for consultation. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the variables of the sample and their association with pre-diagnosis anxiety disorders. A significance level of p < 0.05 was set for all statistical tests, and all analyses were conducted using Power BI and Google Sheets. Results: Young adults (18-35 years old) were more likely to be pre-diagnosed with anxiety disorders compared to individuals in other life stages and the proportion of anxiety disorders was found to be higher in females compared to males, both with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Conclusions: The data observed in Mediktor relates to current scientific evidence and it has the potential as a technological tool for early detection of anxiety disorders.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics committee of Mediktor has given ethical approval for this work

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors