Health-related quality of life among patients with knee osteoarthritis in Guangzhou, China: a multicenter cross-sectional study

Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019;393(10182):1745–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Prieto-Alhambra D, Judge A, Javaid MK, Cooper C, Diez-Perez A, Arden NK. Incidence and risk factors for clinically diagnosed knee, hip and hand osteoarthritis: influences of age, gender, and osteoarthritis affecting other joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(9):1659–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203355.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hunter DJ, Schofield D, Callander E. The individual and socioeconomic impact of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10(7):437–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2014.44.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang J, Fu M, Cao P, Ding C, Wang D. Patient-Reported Quality of life before and after total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter observational study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022;16:737–48. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S357632.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–the development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28(2):88–96. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Perruccio AV, Stefan Lohmander L, Canizares M, Tennant A, Hawker GA, Conaghan PG, et al. The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS-Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS) – an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16(5):542–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.014.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tie X, Zheng R, Zhao M, Han Y, Guo H, Wang Z, et al. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the middle-aged and elderly in China: a Meta-analysis. Chinese J Tissue Eng Res. 2018;22(4):650–6. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.0105.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1323–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Turkiewicz A, Petersson IF, Björk J, Hawker G, Dahlberg LE, Lohmander LS, et al. Current and future impact of osteoarthritis on health care: a population-based study with projections to the year 2032. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22(11):1826–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.07.015.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xie F, Kovic B, Jin X, He X, Wang M, Silvestre C. Economic and humanistic burden of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of large sample studies. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(11):1087–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0424-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van der Waal JM, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J. The impact of non-traumatic hip and knee disorders on health-related quality of life as measured with the SF-36 or SF-12. A systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(4):1141–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-4599-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Puig-Junoy J, Ruiz Zamora A. Socio-economic costs of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of cost-of-illness studies. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015;44(5):531–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.10.012.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

König H-H, Neumann-Böhme S, Sabat I, Schreyögg J, Torbica A, van Exel J, et al. Health-related quality of life in seven European countries throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the European COvid Survey (ECOS). Qual Life Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03334-5.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Devlin NJ, Brooks R. EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present, and Future. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017;15(2):127–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-017-0310-5.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Barr RD, Zhang Y, Wang Q. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive. health status classification system Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Medical Care. 1996;34(7):702–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199607000-00004.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wong EL, Cheung AW, Wong AY, Xu RH, Ramos-Goñi JM, Rivero-Arias O. Normative profile of health-related quality of life for Hong Kong general population using preference-based instrument EQ-5D-5L. Value in Health. 2019;22(8):916–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.014.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McCaffrey N, Kaambwa B, Currow DC, Ratcliffe J. Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14(1):133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0537-0.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Feng Y, Devlin N, Herdman M. Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare? Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0356-8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Agborsangaya CB, Lahtinen M, Cooke T, Johnson JA. Comparing the EQ-5D 3L and 5L: measurement properties and association with chronic conditions and multimorbidity in the general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-74.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Craig BM, Pickard AS, Lubetkin EI. Health problems are more common, but less severe when measured using newer EQ-5D versions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(1):93–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.011.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Garcia-Gordillo MA, Adsuar JC, Olivares PR. Normative values of EQ-5D-5L: in a Spanish representative population sample from Spanish Health Survey, 2011. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(5):1313–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1164-7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(7):1717–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Greenhawt M, Kimball S, Dunn Galvin A, Abrams EM, Shaker MS, Mosnaim G, et al. Media Influence on Anxiety, Health Utility, and Health Beliefs Early in the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic-a Survey Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(5):1327–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06554-y.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Devlin NJ, Shah KK, Feng Y, Mulhern B, van Hout B. Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ. 2018;27(1):7–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3564.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hinz A, Kohlmann T, Stöbel-Richter Y, Zenger M, Brähler E. The quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L: psychometric properties and normative values for the general German population. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(2):443–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0498-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

M, M. V., K, M. V., S, M. A. A. E., de Wit, G. A., Prenger, R., & E, A. S. Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D. Value in Health. 2016;19(4), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003

Golicki D, Niewada M. EQ-5D-5L Polish population norms. Arch Med Sci. 2017;13(1):191–200. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.52126.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xie F, Pullenayegum E, Gaebel K, Bansback N, Bryan S, Ohinmaa A, et al. A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada. Med Care. 2016;54(1):98–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000447.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Purba FD, Hunfeld JAM, Iskandarsyah A, Fitriana TS, Sadarjoen SS, Ramos-Goñi JM, et al. The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L Value Set. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35(11):1153–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0538-9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Augustovski F, Rey-Ares L, Irazola V, Garay OU, Gianneo O, Fernández G, et al. An EQ-5D-5L value set based on Uruguayan population preferences. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(2):323–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1086-4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shiroiwa T, Ikeda S, Noto S, Igarashi A, Fukuda T, Saito S, et al. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan. Value in Health. 2016;19(5):648–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1834.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim SH, Ahn J, Ock M, Shin S, Park J, Luo N, et al. The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Korea. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(7):1845–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1205-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Luo N, Liu G, Li M, Guan H, Jin X, Rand-Hendriksen K. Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China. Value in Health. 2017;20(4):662–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.016.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang Z, Busschbach J, Liu G, Luo N. EQ-5D-5L norms for the urban Chinese population in China. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1036-2.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wong ELY, Ramos-Goñi JM, Cheung AWL, Wong AYK, Rivero-Arias O. Assessing the use of a feedback module to model EQ-5D-5L health states values in Hong Kong. Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Res. 2018;11(2):235–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0278-0.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif