Screening for drinking water contaminants of concern using an automated exposure-focused workflow

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. White paper: Aquatic life criteria for contaminants of emerging concern. 2008. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-08/documents/white_paper_aquatic_life_criteria_for_contaminants_of_emerging_concern_part_i_general_challenges_and_recommendations_1.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

Yadav D, Rangabhashiyam S, Verma P, Singh P, Devi P, Kumar P, et al. Environmental and health impacts of contaminants of emerging concerns: Recent treatment challenges and approaches. Chemosphere. 2021;272:1–19.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kavlock R, Chandler K, Houck K, Hunter S, Judson R, Kleinstreuer N, et al. Update on EPA’s ToxCast program: providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management. Chem Res Toxicol. 2012;25:1287–302.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wambaugh JF, Bare JC, Carignan CC, Dionisio KL, Dodson RE, Jolliet O, et al. New approach methodologies for exposure science. Curr Opin Toxicol. 2019;15:76–92.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cohen Hubal EA, Richard A, Aylward L, Edwards S, Gallagher J, Goldsmith MR, et al. Advancing exposure characterization for chemical evaluation and risk assessment. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2010;13:299–313.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. A proof-of-concept case study integrating publicly available information to screen candidates for chemical prioritization under TSCA. 2021. https://doi.org/10.23645/epacomptox.14878125. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Science Advisory Panel meeting - Endocrine activity and exposure-based prioritization and screening. 2014. https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0614. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

Minnesota Department of Health. Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) protecting Minnesota’s water resources. 2022. https://www.health.state.mn.us/cec. Accessed 17 Aug 2022.

Minnesota Department of Health. Nominated contaminants status and information: MDH drinking water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) initiative. 2021. https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/risk/docs/guidance/dwec/chemstatus.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

Williams AJ, Grulke CM, Edwards J, McEachran AD, Mansouri K, Baker NC, et al. The CompTox Chemistry Dashboard: a community data resource for environmental chemistry. J Cheminform. 2017;9:1–27.

Article  Google Scholar 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Final Contaminant Candidate List 3 Chemicals: Classification of the PCCL to CCL. EPA 815-R-09-008. 2009. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-05/documents/ccl3_pccltoccl_08-31-09_508.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

Mansouri K, Grulke CM, Judson RS, Williams AJ. OPERA models for predicting physicochemical properties and environmental fate endpoints. J Cheminfo. 2018;10:10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Isaacs KK, Glen WG, Egeghy P, Goldsmith MR, Smith L, Vallero D, et al. SHEDS-HT: an integrated probabilistic exposure model for prioritizing exposures to chemicals with near-field and dietary sources. Environ Sci Tech. 2014;48:12750–9.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ring CL, Arnot J, Bennett DH, Egeghy P, Fantke P, Huang L, et al. Consensus Modeling of Median Chemical Intake for the U.S. Population Based on Predictions of Exposure Pathways. Environ Sci Tech 2019;53:719–32.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Isaacs KK, Wall JT, Williams AR, Hobbie KA, Sobus JR, Ulrich E, et al. A harmonized chemical monitoring database for support of exposure assessments. Sci Data. 2022;9:1–11.

Sobus JR, Wambaugh JF, Isaacs KK, Williams AJ, McEachran AD, Richard AM, et al. Integrating tools for non-targeted analysis research and chemical safety evaluations at the US EPA. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2018;28:411–26.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grulke CM, Williams AJ, Thillanadarajah I, Richard AM. EPA’s DSSTox database: History of development of a curated chemistry resource supporting computational toxicology research. Comput Toxicol. 2019;12:1–15.

Article  Google Scholar 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. SHEDS-HT Beta Version 0.1.8. 2019. https://github.com/HumanExposure/SHEDSHTRPackage/releases/tag/v0.1.8. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

Wambaugh JF, Wang A, Dionisio KL, Frame A, Egeghy P, Judson R, et al. High throughput heuristics for prioritizing human exposure to environmental chemicals. Environ Sci Tech 2014;48:12760–7.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lowe CN, Phillips KA, Favela KA, Yau AY, Wambaugh JF, Sobus JR, et al. Chemical characterization of recycled consumer products using suspect screening analysis. Environ Sci Tech. 2021;55:11375–87.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Phillips KA, Yau A, Fayela KA, Isaacs KK, McEachran A, Grulke C, et al. Suspect screening analysis of chemicals in consumer products. Environ Sci Tech 2018;52:3125–35.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Dionisio KL, Phillips K, Price PS, Grulke CM, Williams AJ, Biryol D, et al. The Chemical and Products Database, a resource for exposure-relevant data on chemicals in consumer products. Sci Data. 2018;5:1–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016 Chemical Data Reporting Data Files. 2016. https://www.epa.gov/chemical-data-reporting/access-cdr-data#2016. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Minnesota Pesticide Sales Information. 2022. https://www.mda.state.mn.us/minnesota-pesticide-sales-information. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

Mattingly CJ, Colby GT, Forrest JN, Boyer JL. The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD). Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:793–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Paul Friedman K, Gagne M, Loo LH, Karamertzanis P, Netzeva T, Sobanski T, et al. Utility of in vitro bioactivity as a lower bound Estimate of in vivo adverse effect levels and in risk-based prioritization. Toxicol Sci. 2020;173:202–25.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pearce RG, Setzer RW, Strope CL, Sipes NS, Wambaugh JF. httk: R Package for High-Throughput Toxicokinetics (HTTK). J Stat Softw. 2017;79:1–26.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wetmore BA, Wambaugh JF, Ferguson SS, Sochaski MA, Rotroff DM, Freeman K, et al. Integration of dosimetry, exposure, and high-throughput screening data in chemical toxicity assessment. Toxicol Sci. 2012;125:157–74.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wetmore BA, Wambaugh JF, Allen B, Ferguson SS, Sochaski MA, Setzer RW, et al. Incorporating high-throughput exposure predictions with dosimetry-adjusted in vitro bioactivity to inform chemical toxicity testing. Toxicol Sci. 2015;148:121–36.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

US Environmental Protection Agency. Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, EPA invitroDB v.3.4. 2021. https://doi.org/10.23645/epacomptox.6062503.v6. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

Minnesota Department of Health. Human Health-Based Water Guidance Table. 2022. https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/risk/guidance/gw/table.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CompTox Chemicals Dashboard List: Disinfection by-products (Richardson et al). 2022. https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/chemical-lists/DBP. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CompTox Chemicals Dashboard List: CATEGORY|PHARMACEUTICALS: DrugBank database from the University of Alberta. 2022. https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/chemical-lists/DRUGBANK. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. CompTox Chemicals Dashboard List: NORMAN: List of PFAS from the OECD curated by Nikiforos Alygizakis. 2022. https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/chemical-lists/PFASOECDNA. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. CompTox Chemicals Dashboard List: PESTICIDES|EPA: List of active ingredients updated 10/25/2019. 2019. Available from: https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/chemical-lists/PESTACTIVES. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. CompTox Chemicals Dashboard List: PESTICIDES|EPA: List of inert ingredients food and nonfood use updated 10/25/2019. 2019. https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/chemical-lists/PESTINERTS. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. CompTox Chemicals Dashboard List: CompTox Chemicals Dashboard List: WATER|EPA: Chemical contaminants - CCL 4. 2022. https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/chemical-lists/CCL4. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

Phillips KA, Wambaugh JF, Grulke CM, Dionisio KL, Isaacs KK. High-throughput screening of chemicals as functional substitutes using structure-based classification models. Green Chem. 2017;19:1063–74.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Thomas RS, Bahadori T, Buckley TJ, Cowden J, Deisenroth C, Dionisio KL, et al. The Next Generation Blueprint of Computational Toxicology at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Toxicol Sci. 2019;169:317–32.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hopperstad K, DeGroot DE, Zurlinden T, Brinkman C, Thomas RS, Deisenroth C. Chemical screening in an estrogen receptor transactivation assay with metabolic competence. Toxicol Sci. 2022;187:112–26.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deisenroth C, DeGroot DE, Zurlinden T, Eicher A, McCord J, Lee MY, et al. The alginate immobilization of metabolic enzymes platform retrofits an estrogen receptor transactivation assay with metabolic competence. Toxicol Sci. 2020;178:281–301.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

DeGroot DE, Swank A, Thomas RS, Strynar M, Lee MY, Carmichael PL, et al. mRNA transfection retrofits cell-based assays with xenobiotic metabolism. J Pharm Toxicol Methods. 2018;92:77–94.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Boyce M, Meyer B, Grulke C, Lizarraga L, Patlewicz G. Comparing the performance and coverage of selected in silico (liver) metabolism tools relative to reported studies in the literature to inform analogue selection in read-across: A case study. Comput Toxicol. 2022;21:1–15.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McCord JP, Groff LC II, Sobus JR. Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization. Environ Int. 2022;158:1–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif