Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rubio IT, Zackrisson S, Senkus E (2019) Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol 30:1194–1220. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz173
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rakha EA, Ellis IO (2007) An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol 60:1300–1306. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2006.045377
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liebens F, Carly B, Cusumano P, Van Beveren M, Beier B, Fastrez M, Rozenberg S (2009) Breast cancer seeding associated with core needle biopsies: a systematic review. Maturitas 62:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.002
Philpotts LE (2001) Controversies in core-needle breast biopsy. Semin Roentgenol 36:270–283. https://doi.org/10.1053/sroe.2001.25121
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Knight R, Horiuchi K, Parker SH, Ratzer ER, Fenoglio ME (2002) Risk of needle-track seeding after diagnostic image-guided core needle biopsy in breast cancer. Jsls 6:207–209
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bilous M (2010) Breast core needle biopsy: issues and controversies. Mod Pathol 23(Suppl 2):S36–S45. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.34
Tardivon AA, Guinebretière JM, Dromain C, Deghaye M, Caillet H, Georgin V (2002) Histological findings in surgical specimens after core biopsy of the breast. Eur J Radiol 42:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0720-048x(01)00482-x
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Huang J, Chen X, Fei X, Huang O, Wu J, Zhu L, He J, Chen W, Li Y, Shen K (2019) Changes of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes after core needle biopsy and the prognostic implications in early stage breast cancer: a retrospective study. Cancer Res Treat 51:1336–1346. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.504
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cha YJ, Ahn SG, Bae SJ, Yoon CI, Seo J, Jung WH, Son EJ, Jeong J (2018) Comparison of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes of breast cancer in core needle biopsies and resected specimens: a retrospective analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 171:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4842-7
Mathenge EG, Dean CA, Clements D, Vaghar-Kashani A, Photopoulos S, Coyle KM, Giacomantonio M, Malueth B, Nunokawa A, Jordan J, Lewis JD, Gujar SA, Marcato P, Lee PW, Giacomantonio CA (2014) Core needle biopsy of breast cancer tumors increases distant metastases in a mouse model. Neoplasia 16:950–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2014.09.004
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fu Y, Guo F, Chen H, Lin Y, Fu X, Zhang H, Ding M (2019) Core needle biopsy promotes lung metastasis of breast cancer: an experimental study. Mol Clin Oncol 10:253–260. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2018.1784
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Huang W, Ran R, Shao B, Li H (2019) Prognostic and clinicopathological value of PD-L1 expression in primary breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 178:17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05371-0
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stovgaard ES, Dyhl-Polk A, Roslind A, Balslev E, Nielsen D (2019) PD-L1 expression in breast cancer: expression in subtypes and prognostic significance: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 174:571–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05130-1
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rashid S, Song D, Yuan J, Mullin BH, Xu J (2022) Molecular structure, expression, and the emerging role of Siglec-15 in skeletal biology and cancer. J Cell Physiol 237:1711–1719. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.30654
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lim J, Sari-Ak D, Bagga T (2021) Siglecs as therapeutic targets in cancer. Biology (Basel) 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111178
Gianchecchi E, Arena A, Fierabracci A (2021) Sialic acid-siglec axis in human immune regulation, involvement in autoimmunity and cancer and potential therapeutic treatments. Int J Mol Sci 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115774
Rodrigues Mantuano N, Natoli M, Zippelius A, Läubli H (2020) Tumor-associated carbohydrates and immunomodulatory lectins as targets for cancer immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer 8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001222
Angata T (2020) Siglec-15: a potential regulator of osteoporosis, cancer, and infectious diseases. J Biomed Sci 27:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-019-0610-1
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Aldinucci D, Borghese C, Casagrande N (2020) The CCL5/CCR5 Axis in Cancer Progression. Cancers (Basel) 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071765
Velasco-Velázquez M, Jiao X, De La Fuente M, Pestell TG, Ertel A, Lisanti MP, Pestell RG (2012) CCR5 antagonist blocks metastasis of basal breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 72:3839–3850. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-11-3917
Aldinucci D, Colombatti A (2014) The inflammatory chemokine CCL5 and cancer progression. Mediators Inflamm 2014:292376. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/292376
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jiao X, Wang M, Zhang Z, Li Z, Ni D, Ashton AW, Tang HY, Speicher DW, Pestell RG (2021) Leronlimab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to CCR5, blocks breast cancer cellular metastasis and enhances cell death induced by DNA damaging chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res 23:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-021-01391-1
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gao D, Rahbar R, Fish EN (2016) CCL5 activation of CCR5 regulates cell metabolism to enhance proliferation of breast cancer cells. Open Biol 6. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.160122
Sax MJ, Gasch C, Athota VR, Freeman R, Rasighaemi P, Westcott DE, Day CJ, Nikolic I, Elsworth B, Wei M, Rogers K, Swarbrick A, Mittal V, Pouliot N, Mellick AS (2016) Cancer cell CCL5 mediates bone marrow independent angiogenesis in breast cancer. Oncotarget 7:85437–85449. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13387
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zeng Z, Lan T, Wei Y, Wei X (2022) CCL5/CCR5 axis in human diseases and related treatments. Genes Dis 9:12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2021.08.004
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hemmatazad H, Berger MD (2021) CCR5 is a potential therapeutic target for cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets 25:311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728222.2021.1902505
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Erber R, Hartmann A (2020) Understanding PD-L1 testing in breast cancer: a practical approach. Breast Care (Basel) 15:481–490. https://doi.org/10.1159/000510812
Upadhyaya C, Jiao X, Ashton A, Patel K, Kossenkov AV, Pestell RG (2020) The G protein coupled receptor CCR5 in cancer. Adv Cancer Res 145:29–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acr.2019.11.001
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jeselsohn RM, Werner L, Regan MM, Fatima A, Gilmore L, Collins LC, Beck AH, Bailey ST, He HH, Buchwalter G, Brown M, Iglehart JD, Richardson A, Come SE (2013) Digital quantification of gene expression in sequential breast cancer biopsies reveals activation of an immune response. PLoS One 8:e64225. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064225
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ishibashi H, Suzuki T, Suzuki S, Moriya T, Kaneko C, Takizawa T, Sunamori M, Handa M, Kondo T, Sasano H (2003) Sex steroid hormone receptors in human thymoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:2309–2317. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-021353
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Salgado R, Denkert C, Demaria S, Sirtaine N, Klauschen F, Pruneri G, Wienert S, Van den Eynden G, Baehner FL, Penault-Llorca F, Perez EA, Thompson EA, Symmans WF, Richardson AL, Brock J, Criscitiello C, Bailey H, Ignatiadis M, Floris G et al (2015) The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014. Ann Oncol 26:259–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu450
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hendry S, Salgado R, Gevaert T, Russell PA, John T, Thapa B, Christie M, van de Vijver K, Estrada MV, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Sanders M, Solomon B, Solinas C, Van den Eynden G, Allory Y, Preusser M, Hainfellner J, Pruneri G, Vingiani A et al (2017) Assessing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in solid tumors: a practical review for pathologists and proposal for a standardized method from the International Immunooncology Biomarkers Working Group: part 1: assessing the host immune response, TILs in invasive breast carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ, metastatic tumor deposits and areas for further research. Adv Anat Pathol 24:235–251. https://doi.org/10.1097/pap.0000000000000162
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cirqueira MB, Mendonça CR, Noll M, Soares LR, de Paula Carneiro Cysneiros MA, Paulinelli RR, MAR M, Freitas-Junior R (2021) Prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in invasive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13236090
Vranic S, Cyprian FS, Gatalica Z, Palazzo J (2021) PD-L1 status in breast cancer: current view and perspectives. Semin Cancer Biol 72:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.12.003
Sun J, Lu Q, Sanmamed MF, Wang J (2021) Siglec-15 as an emerging target for next-generation cancer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 27:680–688. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-19-2925
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lin CH, Yeh YC, Yang KD (2021) Functions and therapeutic targets of Siglec-mediated infections, inflammations and cancers. J Formos Med Assoc 120:5–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2019.10.019
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen X, Mo S, Zhang Y, Ma H, Lu Z, Yu S, Chen J (2022) Analysis of a novel immune checkpoint, Siglec-15, in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Pathol Clin Res 8:268–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.260
留言 (0)