Interventions for Reducing Negative Impacts of Workplace Violence Among Health Workers: A Scoping Review

1Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Jawa Barat, Indonesia; 2Department of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

Correspondence: Iyus Yosep, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Ir. Soekarno KM. 21, Hegarmanah, Jatinangor, Sumedang, West Java, 45363, Indonesia, Tel +6281394665577, Fax +6202287793411, Email [email protected]

Abstract: Workplace violence on health workers in the workplace causes physical and psychological problems. Negative impacts on victims of workplace violence such as physical problems, anxiety, depression, stress, and risk of death or risk of suicide. This problem needs to be addressed immediately so as not to impact post-traumatic stress disorder and reduce the work performance of health workers. The purpose of this study is to explore interventions to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence on health workers. This study used scoping review design with a descriptive approach to data analysis. The CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus databases were used in this investigation. This study used PCC’s framework (Population, Content, Context). The keywords are workplace violence, healthcare personnel, interventions, and programs were used by the authors. Search strategy used PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. The sample are health workers, original research used a randomized control trial or quasi-experiment design, and the publication time had to be within the previous ten years (2014– 2023). The JBI assessment was used to assess the quality of the article. We found 11 articles who discuss about interventions to reduce negative effects of workplace violence among health workers. This study shows that there is a decrease in psychological problems in victims of workplace violence such as anxiety, depression, and incidents of workplace violence. The range of sample in this study are 30– 440 respondents. The authors discovered three different types of interventions: training programs, cognitive behavior therapy, and workplace violence programs. Interventions must focus on both the physical and psychological needs of the victims of workplace violence, psychiatric nurses and psychologists carried out interventions in a thorough manner. Interventions carried out by psychiatric nurses and psychologists can reduce the negative impact of workplace violence on health workers such as anxiety, depression and other psychological problems.

Introduction

Workplace violence are incidents in which staff are abused, threatened, or assaulted in circumstances related to their work, including travel to and from work that involves explicit or implicit challenges for their safety, well-being, or health.1 Aggressive behavior of patients toward employees is a form of workplace violence. Physical and psychological violence, physical aggression, such as threats, intimidation, and harassment are all examples of this behavior.2 Previous study defined workplace violence as the use of physical or non-physical force against individuals or groups that may cause injury to the victim’s physical, mental, spiritual, sexual, moral, or social well-being.3

Previous study in the United States of America on 762 health workers in urban areas stated that as many as 76% of health workers had experienced violence, there are 33.4% physical violence and 87.1% verbal violence.4 Previous research in several countries found that 50% of health workers had experienced workplace violence, with verbal abuse being the most common type.5 According to another study, 10% of emergency nurses in Indonesia have experienced physical violence, while 54.6% nurses have non-physical violence by patients.6,7 Previous research found that 50% of nurses had experienced incidents of workplace violence, the most common violence among health workers is verbal violence.8 According to previous study, verbal violence like threats had the highest prevalence (41.6%), physical violence (22.3%), then sexual harassment (19.7%). While bullying has the lowest prevalence in the workplace (9.7%).9

Incidents of workplace violence and bullying among health workers can occur in various rooms in the hospital. Previous research on 486 health workers showed that the rooms that experienced workplace violence were General (20%), Emergency Department (16%), and Other (gynecology, cardiology, children, labs, management, etc.) (64%).10 Other research also showed that as many as 73% of nurses who work in emergency rooms in America feel that they have experienced violence in the workplace.11 In addition, 50% percent of inpatient nurses in public spaces in Indonesia have also experienced violence and bullying in the workplace.12

Workplace violence against health workers are carried out by patients or clients, families or relatives of patients, and fellow workers.13 Previous study have shown that 40% of workplace violence incidents in healthcare workers at work are caused by patients.14 According to other study, patients, patient families, hospital visitors, hospital employees such as nurses, doctors, superiors, and health students are the perpetrators of acts of violence in health care.1,15 Other study also showed that the perpetrators of workplace violence that occur in nurses are caused by senior nurses, doctors, and patients.16

Workplace violence experienced by health workers also pertains to spiritual, moral, and social issues.3,17 Furthermore, violence has a negative impact on the professionalism and quality of health service. Violence can reduce their productivity, alter their relationships with coworkers, and cause them to quit their jobs.11 Previous studies showed that health workers who are victims experience problems, namely psychological stress, sleep disturbances, physical disturbances, and decreased quality of work.18,19 In response to the violence they witness, health professionals report moderate levels of anxiety, avoidance, anger, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).2,20 Various psychological problems such as frustration, distrust of hospitals, decreased patient satisfaction, and even cause prolonged trauma that causes mental health problems in health workers. Acts of violence experienced by nurses, according to other research, cause intellectual, social, physiological, and affective responses.21,22

Previous study has indicated that cognitive behavioral therapy can reduce the negative impact of violence on nurses such as decreasing work quality and patient satisfaction on health workers performance.23,24 So the role of the head of the health workers is important for making policies and reducing the risk of violence. Following a 6-month evaluation, several other health workers complained about workplace violence in other health workers. This study suggested that future research on interventions to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence among health workers be conducted. Previous study also showed that counseling conducted by psychologists as a service to health workers in hospitals can reduce the impact of trauma on victims of workplace violence and bullying in the workplace.25 This intervention is also assisted by head nurses, head doctors, chief pharmacists, and heads of other health workers. The purpose of this intervention is to provide assistance to staff from health workers who experience workplace violence and bullying in the workplace. This aims to streamline the process of implementing interventions for victims of workplace violence.

Previous study showed that nursing interventions are effective in preventing and mitigating the effects of bullying and violence on nurses (p=0.001).26,27 The intervention in the study was in the form of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). In this intervention, participants can also do counseling with a mental nurse. In this study, interventions require collaboration with psychologists in counseling to reduce the risk of bias because the participants are the same profession, namely nurses. According to the findings of the study, collaborative interventions between nurses and other health workers were critical in reducing the impact of violence among nurses. Another scoping review showed that interventions by psychiatric nurses and psychologists to provide counseling and relaxation therapy to nurses for reducing the impact of trauma such as stress and depression on victims of workplace violence and bullying.23 This therapy is only given to nurses, but other health workers also experience similar problems, namely becoming victims of workplace violence. So this study recommends a scoping review of interventions to reduce the impact of workplace violence on health workers. So, this study is the first scoping review to address interventions to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence on health workers.

Workplace violence causes many problems in physical and psychological that cause a decrease in work performance in the workplace.28 So that patients feel dissatisfied with health services. If the problem is prolonged and not resolved, it causes post-traumatic stress disorder. Even victims are at risk of death or risk of suicide.16 To improve workplace safety and comfort, interventions to lessen the impact of workplace violence on health workers are required. As a result, the authors intend to conduct a scoping review of interventions to mitigate the impact of workplace violence among health care workers.

Materials and MethodsDesign

Design in this study used scoping review. This design was chosen by the authors for investigating new topics in the world is the scoping review.29 The authors chose this study because it has a clear conceptual range to present various research results on interventions to reduce the impact of workplace violence and bullying among health workers.30 The authors used 5 stages in this study, namely: 1) determined research objectives; 2) identified research questions and determine the criteria of the articles used; 3) selecting articles; 4) selected research articles, and 5) reported the results of the analysis of the research.31 The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) were used for selecting articles who relevant with the research objective, which was to discuss interventions to reduce the negative effects of workplace violence among health workers.32

Search Methods

To search for articles, the authors used three databases: CINAHL, Pubmed, and Scopus. The keywords used in PubMed are “program”[MeSH Terms] OR program[Text Word] OR intervention[Text Word] AND “workplace violence”[MeSH Terms] OR workplace violence[Text Word] OR work violence[Text Word] AND “health personnel”[MeSH Terms] OR healthcare personnel[Text Word] OR healthcare workers[Text Word]. The keywords used in Scopus are ALL (program OR intervention) AND ALL (workplace violence OR work violence) AND ALL (healthcare personnel OR healthcare workers). The keywords used in CINAHL are: program OR intervention AND workplace violence OR work violence AND healthcare personnel OR healthcare workers. Identification of this research question is whats the methods for providing interventions to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence on health workers?

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The way to measure the criteria in this study used The PCC framework (population, concept, and context) namely:

Population: health workers (nurses, doctor, psycholog, apotecer, etc).

Concept: interventions for health workers.

Context: reduce negative impact, randomized control trial, quasi-experiment

The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review (PRISM -ScR) search strategy was used by the authors to identify methods of intervention to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence on health workers (Figure 1). In this study, the authors used inclusion and exclusion criteria for selecting the articles. This study’s inclusion criteria were health workers, interventions, full text, a randomized control trial design or quasi experiment, and a setting within the last ten years (2013–2022). Non-health worker samples were excluded from this study.

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram.

Notes: Adapted from Page MJ. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. Published online 2021. Creative Commons.33

Selection Articles

Three authors performed a search of articles from all three databases. Each author performed an article search from one database. Then three authors checked the title and abstract of the article search results. Then the three authors determined the articles selected for the full-text review that are in accordance with the inclusion criteria and are relevant to the research objectives. Disagreements in each stage of selecting articles were resolved by discussion (deliberation and consensus between the three authors). If an agreement is not reached by deliberation, then the fourth author is invited to determine the eligibility of the articles.

Data Extraction

Manual tables were used to extract data in this study. The authors created manual tables to make it easier to classify the appropriate data from the article review results. For subsequent descriptions, the authors compared study results from different articles. The authors enter the following information in the manual table: authors, year, country, research design, sample, intervention, and study results.

Quality Appraisal

The authors assessed the quality of articles used the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) instrument’s assessment method. The JBI assessment method consists of statements filled out by the authors as an assessment method. The evaluation of articles with randomized control trial designs included 13 statements, while the evaluation of articles with quasi-experimental designs included 9 statements. There are four response options for each statement: yes, no, unclear, and not applicable. The value of one is assigned to the yes answer option, while the value of zero is assigned to the other answer options. The author evaluates the quality of the article by discussing with all authors (4 authors). During the discussion, the authors agreed on the value of each statement in each article. When there is a debate between authors, the authors vote to give a score to each statement from each article. The authors then added up the worth of each statement. The authors’ standard value for articles determined by the JBI method for use in this study is greater than 75%.

Data Analysis

For data analysis, the authors used a descriptive approach. After acquiring articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The authors examined the article review findings, which are shown in the data extraction table. The authors then discussed the findings of the extraction table analysis, which discussed interventions to reduce the impact of workplace violence on health workers. The data was organized into categories based on similar intervention methods.

Results

The authors found 342 articles by searching three databases with keywords. The authors were then eliminated based on article duplication using Mendeley’s application; 60 articles were duplicated. The authors then eliminated articles based on inclusion criteria and read the titles and abstracts, resulting in 24 articles. The authors then read articles relevant to the research objectives, resulting in 11 articles discussing interventions to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence on the workforce. The authors double-check the articles obtained to ensure that they meet the research objectives and exclusion criteria. The authors then conducted a JBI assessment to ensure high-quality articles. The JBI assessment results are presented in a table (Table 1).

Table 1 JBI Critical Appraisal Tool

The authors extracted data and analyzed the results obtained after discovering 11 articles discussing interventions to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence on health workers. According to the articles obtained, interventions guided by nurses and psychologists can help to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence. The authors obtain three kinds of interventions: training programs, cognitive behavior therapy, and workplace violence prevention programs. The data extraction results are presented in the manual table (Table 2):

Table 2 Extraction Data

According to the characteristics of the articles in this study, 11 articles originated in developed and developing countries. 8 articles came from developed countries (3 from the United States, 2 from Taiwan, 1 from Turkey, 1 from Korea, and 1 from Australia), and 3 from developing countries (1 from Jordan, 1 from Pakistan, and 1 from Iran). The design of this study included 9 quasi-experimental articles and 2 randomized control trial articles. The article’s respondents range from 30 to 440. The samples of six articles were nurses, while the other five articles the samples were all health workers, including psychologists, doctors, nurses, and midwives. This study found that three types of interventions can be used to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence on health workers: training programs, cognitive behavior therapy, and workplace violence programs.

The results of this study focus on interventions to reduce the impact of workplace violence and bullying on health workers in the workplace. The author classifies intervention findings based on similar interventions. This finding shows that some of the articles have facilitators/instructors and clients with similar professions such as nurses and psychologists. However, the instructor/facilitator is a specialist level profession or the head of the profession so that it can reduce the risk of distrust from clients.

Implementation of interventions to reduce the impact of workplace violence and bullying on health workers in the workplace focuses on training to intervene independently, cognitive behavioral therapy, and programs that focus on preventing and treating workplace violence and bullying problems. Activities in the form of counseling, increasing independent skills in reducing the negative impact of workplace violence and bullying in the workplace, and increasing cognitive abilities in solving problems due to workplace violence and bullying. Assistance for victims is also needed in order to carry out useful activities to reduce the negative impacts that are felt.

The following is an explanation of each intervention found from the results of the scoping review:

Training Program

The training program is an intervention that focuses on increasing the ability of individuals to independently manage the impact of workplace violence and bullying. Participants are given a mentor/facilitator to train their abilities so they can solve their own problems accompanied by a facilitator. Training is conducted online and offline. Some of the interventions that provide training are: assertiveness Training is carried out for 2–2.5 hours/session. Creating a positive training environment, nonverbal communication, nonverbal behavior, assertive praise, express feelings, take responsibility, self-introduction, and do self-reflection to increase self-capacity.25 Each group’s activities are guided by the head nurse. Nurses also facilitate victims’ counseling needs and efforts to resolve problems resulting from the trauma they experience. Giving interventions to victims can reduce the effects of trauma on victims.

The training program is an intervention that is carried out for each group one day per week from 09.00–16.00 (as requested by the hospital administration). The program’s components include a definition of workplace violence and guidelines on general rights and responsibilities; selecting the best approach, violence, recognition, and judgment; intervention at work; and monitoring and evaluation.34 Activities are accompanied by a facilitator to provide direction to participants and counseling by a counselor. This shows that there was a significant reduction in stress on the participants.

Simulation Training is carried out for 1–2 hours/session for 3 months. This intervention provides information about types of workplace violence. Then participants also take part in verbal and nonverbal stimulation, improve problem solving skills, and plan to achieve goals as an effort to recover from trauma.37 The activities carried out by the participants were education about workplace violence, improving communication skills, presenting cases and scenarios of violence that might be encountered in the workplace, responding to violence, recovering from stress and trauma, and discussing after activities with the facilitator. After the intervention was given, there was a decrease in workplace violence in nurses and there was an increase in resilience in victims.

Training in Biofeedback and Smartphone-Delivered Biofeedback Training is a type of intervention that can be done both online and offline.38 Participants will receive one 60-minute session per week for six weeks. To increase their resilience, each participant watched a video about meditation and deep breathing techniques for 1–6 weeks. In addition, the video also discusses education and training. The content in the video is information about workplace violence, coping strategies, and efforts to increase resilience. This study found that interventions can help reduce the negative effects of workplace violence on nurses.

The training program lasts 10 months and consists of 12 sessions (2 hours each).43 This intervention was carried out to reduce the effects of trauma on victims, the activities carried out were information about workplace violence, coping, post-traumatic stress disorder, problem solving, and resilience. Activities are carried out to improve the ability of participants to manage themselves to solve their problems. In addition, participants were also accompanied by nurses and psychologists for consultation on their psychological problems. This intervention is proven to reduce the impact of stress due to violence.

Cognitive Behavior Therapy

Cognitive behavioral therapy is a form of psychotherapy that focuses on participant behavior to solve a variety of problems, including depression, anxiety disorders, alcohol and substance abuse problems, family problems, and other mental health problems. Activities carried out in cognitive behavior therapy are identifying problems, solving problems, and practicing positive habits. Some of the interventions in this invention are computer-based training (CBT) intervention is carried out for 60–90 minutes/session.36 Participants take part in the first module with education about the definition of workplace violence, being assertive, setting work boundaries, and increasing resilience. The second module discusses preventing workplace violence, namely body language training, signs and symptoms of violence, skills to prevent violence, and de-escalation techniques. This intervention also teaches about techniques for eliminating trauma due to violence. Participants are invited to recognize the problem and solve the problem they are experiencing. This study shows that there is a significant reduction in the impact of trauma on victims.

The Cognitive Rehearsal Program is made up of 10 sessions totaling 20 hours spread out over 5 weeks (2 hours per session). Counseling to improve nonviolent communication at the primary and secondary levels to help nurses in reducing negative impact of workplace violence on.39 Counseling is also provided to victims in order to find solutions to their problems. According to this study, the interventions effectively reducing negative impact of violence.

Workplace Violence Program

Workplace violence program is an intervention that focuses on preventing and dealing with problems of workplace violence and bullying in the workplace. Participants are trained to understand various things that can be done to reduce the incidence and impact of workplace violence in the workplace. The activities carried out are in the form of therapy to reduce psychological problems in victims, understanding policies that can be applied, as well as several therapies that are carried out independently. One of the workplace violence program interventions is a comprehensive intervention that is carried out for 3 months (60–90 minutes/session). The intervention was carried out over three sessions, namely environmental modification, employee policies, and education and training. Each group is guided to solve problems and training in dealing with trauma by nurses and psychologist.35 This study showed that the intervention is effective in reducing the impact of violence in the workplace.

The workplace violence training program is carried out for 6 months with 10 sessions.40 Each session is carried out for 60 minutes. The training material is given comprehensively by the nurse. Activities consist of understanding violence and bullying, recognizing stress and coping, and solving problems. This study shows that there is a decrease in the impact of workplace violence on nurses.

De-escalation training was carried out for 4 months in 8 sessions (4 hours/session). The training consists of four modules, namely understanding violence and stress, aggressive behavior de-escalation techniques, management of victims of post-traumatic stress disorder, and ways of communicating with victims of workplace violence.41 The training was carried out with a series of activities, namely brainstorming, videos based on scenarios and theater. This study shows that there is a reduction in the impact of negative workplace violence and its occurrence in the hospital.

The workplace violence prevention program is a seminar activity entitled prevention of violence in hospitals. The intervention consists of three databases: before, during and after the intervention to reduce workplace violence.42 Activities include an introduction to violence, communication to victims who experience trauma, efforts to improve problem solving skills, and interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder. This intervention is proven to reduce the incidence and impact of workplace violence on nurses in the hospital.

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that interventions to reduce the negative impact of violence on health workers in the workplace need to be carried out as an effort to reduce ongoing violence. There are several methods that can be done, namely skill training programs, cognitive based training, and workplace violence training. The intervention was carried out by health workers, namely psychologists and doctors. Collaboration between various parties is also important to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence on health workers.

Interventions to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence and bullying such as post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, and other problems are carried out by health workers such as psychiatric nurses, psychologists, and doctors. Psychological problems are the most common problems experienced by victims. So that therapy in the form of counseling and cognitive therapy is an activity carried out to reduce psychological problems in victims. Therapy also takes months to overcome the psychological problems experienced by victims of workplace violence and bullying. This is in line with previous studies which showed that counseling therapy by psychologists and psychiatric nurses can reduce trauma problems in victims of workplace violence in the workplace.44,45 In addition, other studies also show that cognitive therapy can reduce the impact of anxiety, depression, and trauma on health workers who are victims of workplace violence and bullying in the workplace.46,47 Cognitive therapy is provided by psychiatric nurses by providing skill training in solving problems due to workplace violence and bullying in the workplace.

This study shows that violence against health workers occurs in both developed and developing countries. Violence against health workers is not caused by the progress of a country. Although previous studies have shown that incidents of violence against health workers are more common in developing countries. This is caused by the lack of economic factors so that it becomes a burden and stressor. Then take out with violence to co-workers.48 Meanwhile, other studies also show that economic inequality in developing countries causes jealousy, resulting in workplace violence among health workers. In developed countries, workplace violence also occurs quite a lot.49,50 Implementation of interventions to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence on health workers also does not require large costs, resources for facilitators/instructors can use psychologists and psychiatric nurses in the workplace.51,52 In addition, the implementation of the program also only requires experts to guide the therapy carried out, so it does not incur costs for equipment and other things that require high costs.15,53 So that the articles used in this scoping review are evenly distributed from developed countries and developing countries, because the implementation of the intervention is not influenced by the progress of the country. This is due to personal problems that are vented with violence at work. So that workplace violence can occur anywhere and is not influenced by the progress of a country.

Interventions that were found to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence were mostly carried out by nurses and psychologists. Nurses and psychologists act as counselors to deal with psychological problems experienced by victims of workplace violence. Then nurses also act as educators to promote efforts to reduce workplace violence among health workers.54 Nurses also have a role to be a facilitator in building peer support among health workers. Previous studies have shown that the role of psychologists and nurses is important in reducing the psychological impact on victims of workplace violence.55,56 Other study also show that peer support from nurses is needed to reduce anxiety and decrease work motivation in nurses.57

Program implementation to reduce the impact of workplace violence needs to pay attention to various aspects, namely physical, psychological, spiritual, and cultural. The first stage that must be done is to provide protection and show partiality to the victim. Efforts to overcome physical problems need to be done for victims who have physical impacts due to workplace violence. The effects of workplace violence such as anxiety and depression are given therapy to overcome traumatic feelings from stressors that arise due to workplace violence.20 A spiritual and cultural approach is carried out so that victims feel safe and comfortable in carrying out the therapy provided to reduce the impact of workplace violence.58

Skill training program is one method to reduce the impact of workplace violence on health workers. This method is carried out by nurses and psychologists to improve abilities in the psychological aspects of victims of workplace violence. Previous studies have shown that this method is also carried out in groups with the leader being a nurse. Skill training includes resilience, coping, problem solving, and adaptability.16,18 Participants are expected to be able to control themselves to face workplace violence and reduce its impact. Resilience increases the ability of nurses to respond to unpleasant events from workplace bullying. Supported by previous studies which show that resilience can reduce stress levels in victims of violence.59,60 Adaptive coping can improve the ability to respond to stress in victims of workplace violence. Previous study have shown that health workers have avoidant coping in dealing with stressors due to workplace violence.61 So that an increase in adaptive coping in health workers is needed to be able to deal with stress due to workplace violence. Problem solving and adaptive abilities are important things for health workers to have in order to be able to deal with problems caused by workplace violence. This is consistent with the previous statement which shows that problem solving abilities can reduce the negative impact of workplace violence.62

Cognitive behavior therapy is an intervention that focuses on cognitive abilities to overcome problems caused by workplace violence. Nurse-guided interventions are psychotherapies that have been shown to be effective for a wide range of issues, including depression, anxiety disorders, alcohol and substance abuse issues, family issues, eating disorders, and severe mental illness. Previous research has shown that cognitive-based training can help reduce depression caused by workplace violence.39,63 This intervention is also able to help victims to increase work motivation at work. Nurses as leaders in cognitive based behavior therapy provide education and guide therapy that focuses on solving the problems of victims of workplace violence. Other studies also show that CBT interventions are effective in reducing the impact of bullying such as stress and depression.64,65

Workplace violence training is an intervention that focuses on workplace violence given to health workers. This intervention introduces the risks and management of workplace violence to health workers who are at risk of becoming victims. Previous studies have shown that educational activities about workplace violence for hospital staff can reduce the incidence of workplace violence.66,67 Other studies also show that nurses who understand the management of workplace violence are able to reduce the negative effects on victims of workplace violence.68,69 Nurses who understand the management of workplace violence are able to intervene independently and provide support to colleagues who are victims of workplace violence.

Interventions to reduce the impact of workplace violence are important things to be done by workplace managers. Efforts to reduce workplace violence require the collaboration of various parties in order to have awareness of violence in the workplace. By improving the job performance of health workers in the workplace, workplace awareness can help to create a supportive work environment. Interventions to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence on health workers can also improve victims’ psychological health. So that victims can feel safe and secure while performing their duties.

Limitation

The limitation of the study is that the search for articles is restricted to the last ten years. As a result, the authors do not discuss interventions beyond the time allotted. Furthermore, the study is limited by the design of the articles reviewed, which are quasi-experiments and randomized control trials. As a result, findings based on a qualitative or mixed-methods design are not found in this study. This study is also limited in that it does not evaluate the efficacy of interventions to reduce the negative impact of workplace violence on health workers.

Conclusions

The authors discovered 11 articles discussing interventions for reducing the negative impact of workplace violence among health workers. Psychologists and psychiatric nurses serve as counselors and facilitators in the activities that are carried out. Professional similarities between instructors and clients can be overcome by presenting instructors with higher levels of education such as specialists or high functional positions such as heads of professions in health workers such as heads of rooms or senior health workers. Intervention is provided in a comprehensive manner, taking into account both physical and psychological aspects in order to provide victims with protection, security, and comfort. The authors discovered three types of interventions: skill training programs, cognitive based training, and workplace violence program.

The implication of this study is that there is a foundation for the workplace to reduce the impact of workplace violence on health workers. This study also shows that counseling is an effort to reduce the impact of workplace violence and bullying in the workplace, so that workplaces such as hospitals can provide special counseling services for health workers. Apart from that, hospital management also needs to make policies related to the problem of workplace violence and bullying among health workers. So that the workplace becomes a safe and comfortable place in providing the best health services for patients. Management in the workplace can also form a special team to provide therapy such as cognitive therapy and training related to self-therapy to reduce the impact of workplace violence as an effort to reduce problems of workplace violence and bullying in the workplace. Future study with a systematic review and meta-analysis design are recommended for future research to assess the effectiveness of nursing interventions in reducing the negative impact of workplace violence among nurses.

Acknowledgments

All authors are grateful to Universitas Padjadjaran in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia, for providing the database for this study.

Funding

This study received no outside funding.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Geoffrion S, Hills DJ, Ross HM, et al. Education and training for preventing and minimizing workplace aggression directed toward healthcare workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;9(9):CD011860. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011860.pub2

2. Pérez-Fuentes MDC, Molero Jurado MDM, Martos Martínez Á, Simón Márquez MDM, Oropesa Ruiz NF, Gázquez Linares JJ. Cross-sectional study of aggression against Spanish nursing personnel and effects on somatisation of physical symptoms. BMJ Open. 2020;10(3):e034143. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034143

3. Boyle MJ, Wallis J. Working towards a definition for workplace violence actions in the health sector. Saf Heal. 2016;2. doi:10.1186/s40886-016-0015-8

4. Lu L, Dong M, Wang SB, Zhang L, Ng CH, Ungvari GS. Prevalence of workplace violence against health-care professionals in China: a comprehensive meta-analysis of observational surveys. Trauma Violence Abus. 2018;21(3):498–509.

5. Zhao SH, Shi Y, Sun ZN, et al. Impact of workplace violence against nurses’ thriving at work, job satisfaction and turnover intention: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(13–14):2620–2632. doi:10.1111/jocn.14311

6. Johnsen GE, Morken T, Baste V, Rypdal K, Palmstierna T, Johansen IH. Characteristics of aggressive incidents in emergency primary health care described by the Staff Observation Aggression Scale - Revised Emergency (SOAS-RE). BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):33. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4856-9

7. Sahebi A, Golitaleb M, Moayedi S, Torres M, Sheikhbardsiri H. Prevalence of workplace violence against health care workers in hospital and pre-hospital settings: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Front Public Heal. 2022;10:895818. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.895818

8. Park M, Cho SH, Hong HJ. Prevalence and perpetrators of workplace violence by nursing unit and the relationship between violence and the perceived work environment. J Nurs Sch. 2015;47(1):87–95. doi:10.1111/jnu.12112

9. Tian K, Xiao X, Zeng R, et al. Prevalence of workplace violence against general practitioners: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022;37(3):1238–1251. doi:10.1002/hpm.3404

10. Dopelt K, Davidovitch N, Stupak A, Ben Ayun R, Lev Eltsufin A, Levy C. Workplace violence against hospital workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel: implications for public health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(8):4659. doi:10.3390/ijerph19084659

11. Li P, Xing K, Qiao H, et al. Psychological violence against general practitioners and nurses in Chinese township hospitals: incidence and implications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):117. doi:10.1186/s12955-018-0940-9

12. Alyaemni A, Alhudaithi H. Workplace violence against nurses in the emergency departments of three hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional survey. Nurs Plus Open. 2016;2:35–41. doi:10.1016/j.npls.2016.09.001

13. Ceravolo DJ, Schwartz DG, Foltz-Ramos KM, Castner J. Strengthening communication to overcome lateral violence. J Nurs Manag. 2012;20(5):599–606. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01402.x

14. Castronovo MA, Pullizzi A, Evans S. Nurse bullying: a review and a proposed solution. Nurs Outlook. 2016;64(3):208–214. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2015.11.008

15. Liu X, Wang L, Chen W, Wu X. A cross-sectional survey on workplace psychological violence among operating room nurses in Mainland China. Appl Nurs Res. 2021;57:151349. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151349

16. Spelten E, Thomas B, O’Meara P, van Vuuren J, McGillion A, Palese A. Violence against emergency department nurses; can we identify the perpetrators? PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0230793. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230793

17. Sim IO, Ahn KM, Hwang EJ. Experiences of psychiatric nurses who care for patients with physical and psychological violence: a phenomenological study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(14):5159. doi:10.3390/ijerph17145159

18. Zhao S, Qu L, Liu H, Gao L, Jiao M, Liu J. Coping with workplace violence against general practitioners and nurses in Heilongjiang Province, China: social supports and prevention strategies. PLoS One. 2016;11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157897

19. Duan X, Ni X, Shi L, Zhang L, Ye Y, Mu H. The impact of workplace violence on job satisfaction, job burnout, and turnover intention: the mediating role of social support. Heal Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17. doi:10.1186/s12955-019-1164-3

20. Botha E, Gwin T, Purpora C. The effectiveness of mindfulness based programs in reducing stress experienced by nurses in adult hospital settings: a systematic review of quantitative evidence protocol. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep. 2015;13(10):21–29. doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2380

21. Ferrinho P, Sidat M, Delgado AP, Pascoal E. Overlooking workplace violence in health workforce planning in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Heal Plann Manag. 2022;37. doi:10.1002/hpm.3366

22. Fafliora E, Bampalis VG, Zarlas G, Sturaitis P, Lianas D, Mantzouranis G. Workplace violence against nurses in three different Greek healthcare settings. Work. 2015;53(3):551–560. doi:10.3233/WOR-152225

23. Somani R, Muntaner C, Hillan E, Velonis AJ, Smith P. A systematic review: effectiveness of interventions to de-escalate workplace violence against nurses in healthcare settings. Saf Health Work. 2021;12(3):289–295. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2021.04.004

24. Knapp S; ValpoScholar. The effects of a violence assessment checklist on the incidence of violence for emergency department nurses. Valparaiso Universcity; 2013:1–84. Available from: http://scholar.valpo.edu/ebpr. Accessed May19, 2023.

25. Asi Karakaş S, Okanli AE. The effect of assertiveness training on the mobbing that nurses experience. Work Heal Saf. 2015;63(10):446–451. doi:10.1177/2165079915591708

26. Magnavita N, Stasio E, Capitanelli I, Lops EA, Chirico F, Garbarino S. Sleep problems and workplace violence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci. 2019;13. doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00997

27. Nowrouzi-Kia B, Isidro R, Chai E, Usuba K, Chen A. Antecedent factors in different types of workplace violence against nurses: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2019;44:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.11.002

28. De La Fuente M, Schoenfisch A, Wadsworth B, Foresman-Capuzzi J. Impact of behavior management training on nurses’ confidence in managing patient aggression. J Nurs Adm. 2019;49(2):73–78. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000000713

29. Peterson J, Pearce PF, Ferguson LA, Langford CA. Understanding scoping reviews: definition, purpose, and process. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017;29(1):12–16. doi:10.1002/2327-6924.12380

30. Bradbury-Jones C, Aveyard H, Isham L, Taylor J, O L, O’Malley L. Scoping reviews: the PAGER framework for improving the quality of reporting. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2022;25(4):457–470. doi:10.1080/13645579.2021.1899596

31. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi:10.7326/M18-0850

32. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160.

33. Page MJ. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71

34. Al-ali NM, Al Faouri I, Al-niarat TF. The impact of training program on nurses’ attitudes toward workplace violence in Jordan. Appl Nurs Res. 2016;30:83–89. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2015.11.001

35. Gillespie GL, Gates DM, Kowalenko T, Bresler S, Succop P. Implementation of a comprehensive intervention to reduce physical assaults and threats in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs. 2014;40(6):586–591. doi:10.1016/j.jen.2014.01.003

36. Glass N, Hanson GC, Anger WK, et al. Computer-based training (CBT) intervention reduces workplace violence and harassment for homecare workers. Am J Ind Med. 2017;60(7):635–643. doi:10.1002/ajim.22728

37. Ming JL, Huang HM, Hung SP, et al. Using simulation training to promote nurses’ effective handling of workplace violence: a Quasi-Experimental Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(19):3648. doi:10.3390/ijerph16193648

38. Hsieh HF, Huang IC, Liu Y, Chen WL, Lee YW, Hsu HT. The effects of biofeedback training and smartphone-delivered biofeedback training on resilience, occupational stress, and depressive symptoms among abused psychiatric nurses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8):2905. doi:10.3390/ijerph17082905

39. Kang J, Kim JI, Yun S. Effects of a cognitive rehearsal program on interpersonal relationships, workplace bullying, symptom experience, and turnover intention among nurses: a randomized controlled trial. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2017;47(5):689–699. doi:10.4040/jkan.2017.47.5.689

40. Lamont S, Brunero S. The effect of a workplace violence training program for generalist nurses in the acute hospital setting: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;68:45–52. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.008

41. Baig L, Tanzil S, Shaikh S, Hashmi I, Khan MA, Polkowski M. Effectiveness of training on de-escalation of violence and management of aggressive behavior faced by health care providers in a public sector hospital of Karachi. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2018;34(2):294–299. doi:10.12669/pjms.342.14432

42. Hemati-Esmaeili M, Heshmati-Nabavi F, Pouresmail Z, Mazlom S, Reihani H. Educational and managerial policy making to reduce workplace violence against nurses: an action research study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018;23(6):478–485. doi:10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_77_17

43. Arnetz JE, Hamblin L, Russell J, et al. Preventing patient-to-worker violence in hospitals: outcome of a randomized controlled intervention. J Occup Environ Med. 2017;59(1):18–27. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000909

44. Yosep I, Mardhiyah A, Ramdhanie GG, Sari CW, Hendrawati H, Hikmat R. Cognitive behavior therapy by nurses in reducing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder on children as victims of violence: a scoping review. Healthcare. 2023;11(3):407. doi:10.3390/healthcare11030407

45. Isaak V, Vashdi D, Bar-Noy D, Kostisky H, Hirschmann S, Grinshpoon A. Enhancing the safety climate and reducing violence against staff in closed hospital wards. Workplace Health Saf. 2017;65(9):409–416. doi:10.1177/2165079916672478

46. Yosep I, Hikmat R, Mardhiyah A. Types of nursing intervention to reduce impact of bullying and aggression on nurses in the workplace. Healthcare. 2022;10(8):1463. doi:10.3390/healthcare10081463

47. Yosep I, Hikmat R, Mardhiyah A. Nursing intervention for preventing cyberbullying and reducing its negative impact on students: a scoping review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023;16:261–273. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S400779

48. Berry PA, Gillespie GL, Gates D, Schafer J. Novice nurse productivity following workplace bullying. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012;44(1):80–87. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01436.x

49. Wyatt R, Anderson-Drevs K, Male LM. Workplace violence in health care: a critical issue with a promising solution. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1037. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.10384

50. Kumari A, Singh A, Ranjan P, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate workplace violence in healthcare settings. Cureus. 2021;13. doi:10.7759/cureus.19959

51. Alkorashy HAE, Al Moalad FB. Workplace violence against nursing staff in a Saudi University hospital. Int Nurs Rev. 2016;63:226–232. doi:10.1111/inr.12242

52. Wang H, Zhang Y, Sun L. The effect of workplace violence on depression among medical staff in China: the mediating role of interpersonal distrust. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94(3):557–564. doi:10.1007/s00420-020-01607-5

53. Legesse H, Assefa N, Tesfaye D, et al. Workplace violence and its associated factors among nurses working in public hospitals of eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):300. doi:10.1186/s12912-022-01078-8

54. Itzhaki M, Bluvstein I, Peles Bortz A, et al. Mental health nurse’s exposure to workplace violence leads to job stress, which leads to reduced professional quality of life. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:59. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00059

55. Caruso R, Toffanin T, Folesani F, et al. Violence against physicians in the workplace: trends, causes, consequences, and strategies for intervention. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022;24(12):911–924. doi:10.1007/s11920-022-01398-1

56. Liu W, Zhao S, Shi L, Zhang Z, Liu X, Li L. Workplace violence, job satisfaction, burnout, perceived organisational support and their effects on turnover intention among Chinese nurses in tertiary hospitals: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e019525. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019525

57. Magnavita N, Heponiemi T, Chirico F. Workplace violence is associated with impaired work functioning in nurses: an Italian cross-sectional study. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020;52(3):281–291. doi:10.1111/jnu.12549

58. Nikstaitis T, Simko LC. Incivility among intensive care nurses: the effects of an educational intervention. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2014;33(5):293–301. doi:10.1097/DCC.0000000000000061

59. Pien LC, Cheng Y, Cheng WJ. Internal workplace violence from colleagues is more strongly associated with poor health outcomes in nurses than violence from patients and families. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(4):793–800. doi:10.1111/jan.13887

60. Zafar W, Khan UR, Siddiqui SA, Jamali S, Razzak JA. Workplace violence and self-reported psychological health: coping with post-traumatic stress, mental distress, and burnout among physicians working in the emergency departments compared to other specialties in Pakistan. J Emerg Med. 2016;50(1):167–177.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.049

61. Shi L, Zhang D, Zhou C, et al. A cross-sectional study on the prevalence and associated risk factors for workplace violence against Chinese nurses. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e013105. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013105

62. Xing K, Zhang X, Jiao M, et al. Concern about workplace violence and its risk factors in Chinese township hospitals: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(8):811. doi:10.3390/ijerph13080811

63. Koh WMS. Management of work place bullying in hospital: a review of the use of cognitive rehearsal as an alternative management strategy. Int J Nurs Sci. 2016;3(2):213–222. doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.04.010

64. Griffin M, Clark CM. Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2014;45(12):535–542. doi:10.3928/00220124-20141122-02

65. Yosep I, Hikmat R, Mardhiyah A, Lukman M, Hendrawati H, Hikmat R. Interventions focused by nurses for reducing negative effect of traumatic experience on victims of sexual violence: a scoping review. Healthcare. 2023;11(1). doi:10.3390/healthcare11010125

66. Xing K, Jiao M, Ma H, et al. Physical violence against general practitioners and nurses in Chinese township hospitals: a cross-sectional survey. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142954. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142954

67. Etienne E. Exploring workplace bullying in nursing. Workplace Health Saf. 2014;62(1):6–11. doi:10.1177/216507991406200102

68. Yokoyama M, Suzuki M, Takai Y, Igarashi A, Noguchi-Watanabe M, Yamamoto-Mitani N. Workplace bullying among nurses and their related factors in Japan: a cross-sectional survey. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(17–18):2478–2488. doi:10.1111/jocn.13270

69. Sarwar A, Naseer S, Zhong JY. Effects of bullying on job insecurity and deviant behaviors in nurses: roles of resilience and support. J Nurs Manag. 2020;28(2):267–276. doi:10.1111/jonm.12917

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif