Application of three-dimensional multi-imaging combination in brachytherapy of cervical cancer

Small W Jr, Bacon MA, Bajaj A et al (2017) Cervical cancer: a global health crisis. Cancer 123:2404–2412. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30667

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S et al (2019) Cervical cancer, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17:64–84. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0001

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Han K, Milosevic M, Fyles A et al (2013) Trends in the utilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer in the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.033

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Viswanathan AN, Creutzberg CL, Craighead P et al (2012) International brachytherapy practice patterns: a survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:250–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.030

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tod MC, Meredith WJ(1938) A dosage system for use in the treatment of cancer of the uterine cervix. Br J Radiol 11:809–824. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-11-132-809

Article  Google Scholar 

ICRU Report 38: Dose and volume specification for reporting intracavitary therapy in gynecology. (1985) International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements,Bethesda, MD, United States

Haie-Meder C, Pötter R, Van Limbergen E et al (2005) Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol 74:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.015

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

ICRU Report 89: Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Brachytherapy for Cancer of the Cervix. (2013) Journal of the ICRU 13:NP. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/ndw027

Schmid MP, Nesvacil N, Pötter R et al (2016) Transrectal ultrasound for image-guided adaptive brachytherapy in cervix cancer—an alternative to MRI for target definition? Radiother Oncol 120:467–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.01.021

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hellebust TP (2018) Place of modern imaging in brachytherapy planning. Cancer Radiother 22:326–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2018.03.005

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Polo A (2010) Image fusion techniques in permanent seed implantation. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2:98–106. https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2010.16920

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yang X, Rossi PJ, Jani AB et al (2017) Improved prostate delineation in prostate HDR brachytherapy with TRUS-CT deformable registration technology: a pilot study with MRI validation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18:202–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12040

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Peach MS, Trifiletti DM, Libby B (2016) Systematic review of focal prostate brachytherapy and the future implementation of image-guided prostate HDR brachytherapy using MR-ultrasound fusion. Prostate Cancer 2016:4754031. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4754031

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bowes D, Crook JM, Araujo C et al (2013) Ultrasound-CT fusion compared with MR-CT fusion for postimplant dosimetry in permanent prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 12:38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2012.03.007

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tisseverasinghe S, Marbán M, Crook J et al (2021) Comparison between postoperative TRUS-CT fusion with MRI-CT fusion for postimplant quality assurance in prostate LDR permanent seed brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 20:849–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2021.03.005

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Soror T, Siebert FA, Lancellotta V et al. (2021) Quality Assurance in Modern Gynecological HDR-Brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy): Clinical Considerations and Comments. Cancers (Basel) 13 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040912

Dimopoulos JC, Petrow P, Tanderup K et al (2012) Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV): basic principles and parameters for MR imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 103:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.024

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pötter R, Tanderup K, Schmid MP et al (2021) MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE-I): a multicentre prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 22:538–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30753-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Russo L, Lancellotta V, Miccò M et al (2022) Magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy): a pictorial essay focused on radiologist management. J Contemp Brachytherapy 14:287–298. https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.117727

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Phan T, Mula-Hussain L, Pavamani S et al (2015) The changing landscape of brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a Canadian practice survey. Curr Oncol 22:356–360. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2562

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Grover S, Harkenrider MM, Cho LP et al (2016) Image guided cervical brachytherapy: 2014 Survey of the American Brachytherapy Society. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 94:598–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.11.024

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Viswanathan AN, Dimopoulos J, Kirisits C et al (2007) Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized contours. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:491–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.021

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hegazy N, Pötter R, Kirisits C et al (2013) High-risk clinical target volume delineation in CT-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: impact of information from FIGO stage with or without systematic inclusion of 3D documentation of clinical gynecological examination. Acta Oncol 52:1345–1352. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186x.2013.813068

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mitchell DG, Snyder B, Coakley F et al (2006) Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol 24:5687–5694. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.07.4799

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eskander RN, Scanderbeg D, Saenz CC et al (2010) Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer brachytherapy target and normal tissue contouring. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181c4a627

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iwai Y, Nemoto MW, Horikoshi T et al (2020) Comparison of CT-based and MRI-based high-risk clinical target volumes in image guided-brachytherapy for cervical cancer, referencing recommendations from the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG) and consensus statement guidelines from the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC ESTRO). Jpn J Radiol 38:899–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00980-y

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmid MP, Pötter R, Brader P et al (2013) Feasibility of transrectal ultrasonography for assessment of cervical cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 189:123–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-012-0258-1

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fischerova D, Cibula D, Stenhova H et al (2008) Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of early cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18:766–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01072.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Testa AC, Ludovisi M, Manfredi R et al (2009) Transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of presence, size and extent of invasive cervical cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:335–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7325

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gong Y, Wang Q, Dong L et al (2017) Different imaging techniques for the detection of pelvic lymph nodes metastasis from gynecological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8:14107–14125. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12959

Van Dyk S, Khaw P, Lin MY et al (2021) Ultrasound-guided brachytherapy for cervix cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 33:e403–e411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2021.02.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sapienza LG, Jhingran A, Kollmeier MA et al (2018) Decrease in uterine perforations with ultrasound image-guided applicator insertion in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 151:573–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Akbas T, Ugurluer G, Acil M et al (2018) Intraoperative sonographic guidance for intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer. J Clin Ultrasound 46:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22510

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van Dyk S, Schneider M, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S et al (2015) Ultrasound use in gynecologic brachytherapy: time to focus the beam. Brachytherapy 14:390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2014.12.001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kalash R, Glaser SM, Rangaswamy B et al (2018) Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer patients with incomplete response on positron emission tomography/computed tomography after image-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 102:1008–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.092

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim N, Park W, Cho WK et al (2022) Clinical outcomes after positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13758

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Han S, Kim H, Kim YJ et al (2018) Prognostic value of volume-based metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in uterine cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:1112–1121. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.18.19734

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chopra S, Engineer R, Shah S et al (2020) MRI- and PET-guided interstitial brachytherapy for postsurgical vaginal recurrences of cervical cancer: results of phase II study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 106:310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.037

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Min LA, Ackermans LL, Nowee ME et al (2020) Pre-treatment prediction of early response to chemoradiotherapy by quantitative analysis of baseline staging FDG-PET/CT and MRI in locally advanced cervical cancer. Acta Radiol:284185120943046. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185120943046

Kim N, Park W, Cho

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif