Available online 3 May 2023, 115977
Author links open overlay panel, , , , , , , Highlights•Analytical sensitivity antigen tests similar for Omicron and pre-Delta variants
•Loss of analytical sensitivity for detection Omicron variant only at low viral load
•Fluorescence immunoassay more sensitive than lateral flow antigen at low viral load
AbstractBackgroundAnalytical sensitivity of two rapid antigen tests was evaluated for detection of presumed SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants and earlier variants of concern.
Methods152 SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive samples (N and ORF1ab positive but S gene negative) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antigen by ACON lateral flow and LumiraDx fluorescence immunoassays. Sensitivity within 3 viral load ranges was compared among these 152 samples and 194 similarly characterized samples collected prior to the circulation of the Delta variant (pre-Delta).
ResultsAntigen was detected in >95% of pre-Delta and presumed Omicron samples for both tests at viral loads >500,000 copies/mL, and 65 to 85% of samples with 50,000-500,000 copies/mL. At viral load <50,000 copies/mL, antigen tests showed better sensitivity in detecting pre-Delta compared to Omicron variants. LumiraDx was more sensitive than ACON at low viral load.
ConclusionsAntigen tests had decreased sensitivity for detecting presumed Omicron compared to pre-Delta variants at low viral load.
Key wordsSARS-CoV-2
antigen
rapid diagnostic test
Omicron
AbbreviationsSARS-CoV-2severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
RT-qPCRreverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Ag RDTrapid antigen diagnostic tests
FIAfluorescence immunoassay
CLIAClinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments
EUAemergency use authorization
FDAUnited States Food and Drug Administration
View Abstract© 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
留言 (0)