Creating and Implementing a Novel Wellness-Inspired Resident Educational (WIRE) Curriculum

To date, education about health equity for early-stage healthcare trainees is largely situated outside of surgical disciplines. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical equity curriculum offered to a voluntary group of medical and graduate students.

Mixed-methods cohort study from January to June 2021. Pre- and post-course surveys measured domains of attitudes, self-reported confidence, and knowledge via 5-point Likert scale and multiple-choice questions. Paired t tests were used to analyze quantitative responses. Qualitative responses were studied via iterative thematic analysis.

At the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, PA which provides tertiary level, institutional care, 10, interdisciplinary 1.5-hour sessions were held over 1 semester, teaching surgical equity topics that spanned the peri-operative continuum.

Twenty-four medical and graduate students from across the University of Pennsylvania enrolled. Twenty completed both surveys.

From pre- to post-course, students improved across all domains. Students improved in their self-rated ability to identify strategies to talk about sensitive health topics with patients (pre: 20%, post: 90%) and identify strategies to address healthcare disparities in surgery (pre: 10%, post: 90%). Qualitatively, from pre- to post-course, more students could articulate the role of bias and identify opportunities for surgeons to engage in surgical equity. The course strengthened any pre-existing interest in surgical equity, and for 1 student, created interest in a surgical career where it had not previously existed. Many also expressed greater resolve to provide patient-centric care.

Formal curricula can improve students’ ability to advocate for surgical equity. A similar framework may fill a need for medical students interested in health equity and surgical careers at other institutions.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif