Long-term valve performance of St Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis in aortic position

Basman C, Pirelli L, Singh VP, et al. Lifetime management for aortic stenosis: planning for future therapies. J Cardiol. 2022;S0914–5087:365–8.

Google Scholar 

Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143:e35-71.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:561–632.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jamieson WR, Lewis CT, Sakwa MP, et al. St Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis: results of the regulatory evaluation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:1449–54.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zenses AS, Evin MA, Stanová V, et al. Effect of size and position of self-expanding transcatheter valve on haemodynamics following valve-in-valve procedure in small surgical bioprostheses: an in vitro study. EuroIntervention. 2018;14:e282–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mykén PS, Caidahl K, Larsson S, et al. 10-year experience with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994;3:648–56.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lehmann S, Merk DR, Etz CD, et al. Porcine xenograft for aortic, mitral and double valve replacement: long-term results of 2544 consecutive patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:1150–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mykén PS, Bech-Hansen O. A 20-year experience of 1712 patients with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:76–81.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kato Y, Suehiro S, Shibata T, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival and left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Card Surg. 2007;22:314–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, et al. Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: the academic research consortium-2 consensus document. Circulation. 2018;137:2635–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dvir D, Bourguignon T, Otto CM, et al. Standardized definition of structural valve degeneration for surgical and transcatheter bioprosthetic aortic valves. Circulation. 2018;137:388–99.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mathers CD, Sadana R, Salomon JA, et al. Healthy life expectancy in 191 countries, 1999. Lancet. 2001;357:1685–91.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blackman DJ, Saraf S, MacCarthy PA, et al. Long-term durability of transcatheter aortic valve prostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:537–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sommers KE, David TE. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:1608–12.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sakamoto Y, Hashimoto K. Update on aortic valve prosthesis-patient mismatch in Japan. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;61:669–75.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Takakura H, Sasaki T, Hashimoto K, et al. Hemodynamic evaluation of 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:609–13.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bapat V. Valve-in-valve apps: why and how they were developed and how to use them. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:U44-51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chhatriwalla AK, Allen KB, Saxon JT, et al. Bioprosthetic valve fracture improves the hemodynamic results of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e005216.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nakazato T, Hata H, Toda K, et al. Midterm clinical outcomes of the St Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position. Circ J. 2018;83:110–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maeda S, Toda K, Shimamura K, et al. Long-term survival after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement for low or intermediate surgical risk aortic stenosis: comparison with general population. J Cardiol. 2023;81:68–75.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif