Background: There have been dramatic clinical improvements in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients commenced on the cystic fibrosis conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI). Sputum proteomics is a powerful research technique capable of identifying important airway disease mechanisms. Using this technique, we evaluated how ETI changes the sputum proteome in people with CF. Methods: Sputum samples from 21 CF subjects pre- and post- ETI, 6 CF controls ineligible for ETI, and 15 healthy controls were analysed by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Results: Post-ETI, mean FEV1% increased by 13.7% (SD 7.9). Principal component and hierarchical clustering analysis revealed that the post-ETI proteome shifted to an intermediate state that was distinct from pre-ETI and healthy controls, even for those achieving normal lung function. Functional analysis showed incomplete resolution of neutrophilic inflammation. The CF control sputum proteome did not alter. At the protein-level many more proteins increased in abundance than decreased following ETI therapy (80 vs 30; adjusted p value <0.05), including many that have anti-inflammatory properties. Of those proteins that reduced in abundance many were pro-inflammatory neutrophil-derived proteins. Several important respiratory proteases were unchanged. Conclusions: Sputum proteomics can provide insights into CF lung disease mechanisms and how they are modified by therapeutic intervention, in this case ETI. This study identifies imbalances in pro- and anti- inflammatory proteins in sputum that partially resolve with ETI even in those achieving normal spirometry values. This post-ETI intermediate state could contribute to ongoing airway damage and therefore its relevance to clinical outcomes needs to be established.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This research was funded by a project grant from the North West Lung Centre Charity

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Northwest Haydock Research Ethics Committee (20/NW/0302)

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors