Ackermann H. Ataxien: Assessment und Management. In: Frommelt P, Lösslein H, Hrsg. Neurorehabilitation: Ein Praxisbuch für interdisziplinäre Teams. Berlin: Springer; 2010.

Google Scholar 

Küper M. Motorische Rehabilitation von degenerativen Kleinhirnerkrankungen. Akt Neurol. 2014;41:294–302.

Article  Google Scholar 

Horst R. Vom Schwanken und Schlucken: Neuroorthopädische Therapie bei Ataxie. Physiopraxis. 2017;17:24–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ashizawa T, Xia G. Ataxia. Continuum. 2016;22:1208–26.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Klockgether T, et al. Ataxien des Erwachsenenalters, S1-Leitlinien. In: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie, Hrsg. Leitlinie für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. 2018. http://www.dgn.org/leitlinien (abgerufen am 08.01.2022).

Google Scholar 

Flachenecker P, Eichstädt K, Berger K, Ellenberger D, Friede T, Haas J, et al. Multiple Sklerose in Deutschland: aktualisierte Auswertungen des MS-Registers der DMSG 2014–2018. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2020;88:436–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feil K, Adrion C, Teufel J, Bösch S, Claassen J, Giordano I, et al. Effects of acetyl-DL-leucine on cerebellar ataxia (ALCAT trial): study protocol for a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover phase III trial. BMC Neurol. 2017;17:1–11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ilg W, Bastian AJ, Boesch S, Burciu RG, Celnik P, Claaßen J, et al. Consensus paper: management of degenerative cerebellar disorders. Cerebellum. 2014;13:248–68.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Eigentler A, Rhomberg J, Nachbauer W, Ritzer I, Poewe W, Boesch S. The scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia correlates with dysarthria assessment in Friedreich’s ataxia. J Neurol. 2011;259:420–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Preis R, Taxhet G, Hofmann-Kock D. Physiotherapeutisches Selbstverständnis. In: Ebelt-Paprotny G, Taxhet G, Wappelhorst U, Hrsg. Leitfaden Physiotherapie. München: Elsevier; 2017.

Google Scholar 

Potter K, Fulk GD, Salem Y, Sullivan J. Outcome measures in neurological physical therapy practice: part I. Making sound decisions. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011;35:57–64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stevens JGA, Beurskens AJ. Implementation of measurement instruments in physical therapist practice: development of a tailored strategy. Phys Ther. 2010;90:953–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Swinkels RA, van Peppen RP, Wittink H, Custers JW, Beurskens AJ. Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:106.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Diermayr G, Schachner H, Eidenberger M, Lohkamp M, Salbach NM. Evidence-based practice in physical therapy in Austria: current state and factors associated with EBP engagement. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21:1219–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Freitag L, Hohenauer E, Deflorin C, Böni AC, Clijsen R. Barrieren und Förderfaktoren in der evidenzbasierten Praxis (EBP) der Physiotherapie – Eine Bestandsaufnahme und Eruierung von Barrieren und Förderfaktoren zur Anwendung von EBP mit Physiotherapeut*innen der deutschsprachigen Schweiz. Physioscience. 2022;18:6–16.

Article  Google Scholar 

Risahmawati RR, Emura SS, Nishi TT, Koizumi SS. Japanese resident physicians’ attitudes, knowledge, and perceived barriers on the practice of evidence based medicine: a survey. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:374.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:268–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Braun T, Schulz R‑J, Hoffmann M, Reinke J, Tofaute L, Urner C, et al. Deutsche Version des De Morton Mobility Index. Erste klinische Ergebnisse aus dem Prozess der interkulturellen Adaptation. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;48:154–63.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Salcı Y, Fil A, Keklicek H, Çetin B, Armutlu K, Dolgun A, et al. Validity and reliability of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in multiple sclerosis patients with ataxia. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017;18:135–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schülein S, Pflugrad L, Petersen H, Lutz M, Volland-Schüssel K, Gaßmann K‑G. Deutsche Übersetzung des „Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment“ nach Tinetti. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2017;50:498–505.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmitz-Hübsch T, Du Tezenas Montcel S, Baliko L, Berciano J, Boesch S, Depondt C, et al. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Neurology. 2006a;66:1717–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saute JAM, Donis KC, Serrano-Munuera C, Genis D, Ramirez LT, Mazzetti P, et al. Ataxia rating scales—psychometric profiles, natural history and their application in clinical trials. Cerebellum. 2012;11:488–504.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Perez-Lloret S, van de Warrenburg B, Rossi M, Rodríguez-Blázquez C, Zesiewicz T, Saute JAM, et al. Assessment of ataxia rating scales and cerebellar functional tests: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2021;36:283–97.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schwabova J, Maly T, Laczo J, Zumrova A, Komarek V, Musova Z, Zahalka F. Application of a Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in Friedreich’s ataxia patients according to posturography is limited. J Neurol Sci. 2014;341:64–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmitz-Hübsch T, Du Tezenas Montcel S, Baliko L, Boesch S, Bonato S, Fancellu R, et al. Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale: a study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients. Mov Disord. 2006;21:699–704.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rummey C, Corben LA, Delatycki MB, Subramony SH, Bushara K, Gomez CM, et al. Psychometric properties of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale. Neurol Genet. 2019;5:371.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yabe I, Matsushima M, Soma H, Basri R, Sasaki H. Usefulness of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). J Neurol Sci. 2008;266:164–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bürk K, Mälzig U, Wolf S, Heck S, Dimitriadis K, Schmitz-Hübsch T, et al. Comparison of three clinical rating scales in Friedreich ataxia (FRDA). Mov Disord. 2009;24:1779–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hartley H, Pizer B, Lane S, Sneade C, Pratt R, Bishop A, Kumar R. Inter-rater reliability and validity of two ataxia rating scales in children with brain tumours. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015;31:693–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jacobi H, Du Montcel ST, Romanzetti S, Harmuth F, Mariotti C, Nanetti L, et al. Conversion of individuals at risk for spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6 to manifest ataxia (RISCA): a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:738–47.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim B‑R, Lim J‑H, Lee SA, Park S, Koh S‑E, Lee I‑S, et al. Usefulness of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in Ataxic Stroke Patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35:772–80.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Weyer A, Abele M, Schmitz-Hübsch T, Schoch B, Frings M, Timmann D, Klockgether T. Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: a study in 64 ataxia patients. Mov Disord. 2007;22:1633–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yamauchi K, Kumagae K, Goto K, Hagiwara R, Uchida Y, Harayama E, et al. Predictive validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia for medium-term functional status in acute ataxic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30:105631.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmitz-Hübsch T, Fimmers R, Rakowicz M, Rola R, Zdzienicka E, Fancellu R, et al. Responsiveness of different rating instruments in spinocerebellar ataxia patients. Neurology. 2010;74:678–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reetz K, Dogan I, Hilgers R‑D, Giunti P, Parkinson MH, Mariotti C, et al. Progression characteristics of the European Friedreich’s Ataxia Consortium for Translational Studies (EFACTS): a 4-year cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:362–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lawerman TF, Brandsma R, Burger H, Burgerhof JGM, Sival DA. Age-related reference values for the pediatric Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia: a multicentre study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59:1077–82.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lawerman TF, Brandsma R, Verbeek RJ, van der Hoeven JH, Lunsing RJ, Kremer HPH, Sival DA. Construct validity and reliability of the SARA gait and posture sub-scale in early onset ataxia. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:605.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11:80–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lenzner T, Neuert C, Otto W. Kognitives pretesting. Mannheim: GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften; 2015. SDM Survey Guidelines): SDM-Survey Guidelines (GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences.

Google Scholar 

Mayring P. Einführung in die Qualitative Sozialforschung. 6. Aufl. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz; 2016.

Google Scholar 

Schomberg M, Greisberger A, Salbach NM, Diermayr G. EPIC-Skala – Übersetzung und interkulturelle Adaptation für die Schweiz, Österreich und Deutschland. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019;149:57–65.