Current Trends in Sex Trafficking Research

International Labour Office (ILO). ILO global estimate of forced labour: results and methodology. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2012. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/forced-labour/publications/WCMS_182004/lang--en/index.htm.

•• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Global report on trafficking in persons. New York: United Nations; 2020. Available from:https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/tip/2021/GLOTiP_2020_15jan_web.pdf. This report provides an in-depth examination of trafficking internationally, with specific sections for different international regions.

International Labour Office (ILO). Global estimates of child labour: results and trends, 2012–2016. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2017. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_575499/lang--en/index.htm.

U.S. Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act. Public Law 2000:106–386.

Greenbaum J. A public health approach to global child sex trafficking. Annual Review of Public Health 2020:41:481–497. Available from: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094335.

Kenny MC, Helpingstine C, Long H, Harrington MC. Assessment of commercially sexually exploited girls upon entry to treatment: confirmed vs. at risk victims. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;100:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104040.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lanctôt N, Reid JA, Laurier C. Nightmares and flashbacks: the impact of commercial sexual exploitation of children among female adolescents placed in residential care. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;100:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104195.

Article  Google Scholar 

Palines PA, Rabbitt AL, Pan AY, Nugent ML, Ehrman WG. Comparing mental health disorders among sex trafficked children and three groups of youth at high-risk for trafficking: adual retrospective cohort and scoping review. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;100:104–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104196.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bureau of Public Affairs. Facts about human trafficking. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of State; 2004. Available from: https://2001-2009.state.gov/documents/organization/33216.pdf.

Goodey J. Human trafficking: sketchy data and policy responses. Criminol Crim Justice. 2008;8(4):421–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895808096471.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jones L, Engstrom DW, Hilliard T., Diaz M. Globalization and human trafficking. J Soc Soc Welfare 2007:34:107. Available from: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol34/iss2/8.

Hodge DR, Lietz CA. The international sexual trafficking of women and children: a review of the literature. Affilia. 2007;22(2):163–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109907299055.

Article  Google Scholar 

Logan TK, Walker R, Hunt G. Understanding human trafficking in the United States. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2009;10(1):3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838008327262.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McClain NM, Garrity SE. Sex trafficking and the exploitation of adolescents. Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011;40:243–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01221.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

• Roe-Sepowitz D. A six-year analysis of sex traffickers of minors: exploring characteristics and sex trafficking patterns. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2019;29:608–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1575315. This study utilized a large sample of sex trafficking cases in the U.S. to develop an understanding of the behaviors and characteristics used by child sex traffickers.

Article  Google Scholar 

• Franchino-Olsen H. Vulnerabilities relevant for commercial sexual exploitation of children/domestic minor sex trafficking: a systematic review of risk factors. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021;22(1):99–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018821956. This systematic review examined risk factors of domestic sex trafficking in the U.S.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hogan KA, Roe-Sepowitz D. LGBTQ+ homeless young adults and sex trafficking vulnerability. J Hum Traffick. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2020.1841985.

Article  Google Scholar 

•• Kragten-Heerdink SL, van de Weijer SG, Weerman FM. Crossing borders: does it matter? Differences between (near-) domestic and cross-border sex traffickers, their victims and modus operandi. Eur J Criminol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708221092314. This was the first study to examine the differences between international and domestic sex trafficking in Europe.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moore JL, Houck C, Hirway P, Barron CE, Goldberg AP. Trafficking experiences and psychosocial features of domestic minor sex trafficking victims. J Interpers Violence. 2020;35(15–16):3148–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517703373.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Veldhuizen-Ochodničanová E, Jeglic EL, Boskovic I. Separate routes, similar crimes? Conceptualizing differences between domestic and international sex traffickers in the United States. Int J Law Crime Justice 2020:62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2020.100395. This was the first study to examine the differences between international and domestic sex trafficking in the U.S.

Baird K, McDonald KP, Connolly J. Sex trafficking of women and girls in a southern Ontario region: police file review exploring victim characteristics, trafficking experiences, and the intersection with child welfare. Can J Behav Sci. 2020;52(1):8–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000151.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fedina L, Williamson C, Perdue T. Risk factors for domestic child sex trafficking in the United States. J Interpers Violence. 2019;34(13):2653–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516662306.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Franchino-Olsen H, Silverstein HA, Kahn NF, Martin SL. Minor sex trafficking of girls with disabilities. Int J Hum Rights Healthc. 2020;13(2):97–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-07-2019-0055.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gerassi LB, Skinkis S. An intersectional content analysis of inclusive language and imagery among sex trafficking-related services. Violence Vict. 2020;35(3):400–17. https://doi.org/10.1891/VV-D-18-00204.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Panlilio CC, Miyamoto S, Font SA, Schreier HM. Assessing risk of commercial sexual exploitation among children involved in the child welfare system. Child Abuse Negl. 2019;87:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.07.021.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shilo G, Preis H, Peled E. Gender differences among commercially sexually exploited youth in Israel. Child Abus Rev. 2021;30(1):32–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2646.

Article  Google Scholar 

Reed SM, Kennedy MA, Decker MR, Cimino AN. Friends, family, and boyfriends: an analysis of relationship pathways into commercial sexual exploitation. Child Abuse Negl. 2019;90:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.01.016.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Winters GM, Schaaf S, Grydehoj RF, Allan C, Lin A, Jeglic EL. The sexual grooming model of child sex trafficking. Vict Offender. 2022;17(1):60–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2021.1926031. This paper developed a theoretical model of grooming in cases of sex trafficking utilizing current literature from the fields of sex trafficking and child sexual abuse.

Article  Google Scholar 

Viuhko M. Just trust me and you’ll make a fortune–relationships between offenders and victims of human trafficking. Nord J Criminol. 2019;20(2):196–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578983X.2019.1591036.

Article  Google Scholar 

Melgar P, Merodio, G, Duque E, Ramis-Salas M. “Petites Bonnes” minors sex trafficked in Morocco and Spain. Child Youth Serv Rev 2021:120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105719.

Dalla RL, Panchal TJ, Erwin S, Peter J, Roselius K, Ranjan K, et al. Structural vulnerabilities, personal agency, and caste: an exploration of child sex trafficking in rural India. Violence Vict. 2020;35(3):307–30. https://doi.org/10.1891/VV-D-19-00048.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Greenbaum VJ, Dodd M, McCracken C. A short screening tool to identify victims of child sex trafficking in the health care setting. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34(1):33–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000000602. This paper presents the development of a screening tool used in medical settings to identify children who have been sexually trafficked.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Peterson LJ, Foell R, Lunos S, Heisterkamp B, Greenbaum VJ, Harper NS. Implementation of a screening tool for child sex trafficking among youth presenting to the emergency department–a quality improvement initiative. Child Abuse Negl. 2022;125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105506.

Hurst IA, Abdoo, DC, Harpin S, Leonard J, Adelgais K. Confidential screening for sex trafficking among minors in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2021; 147(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2021.1926031.

• Preble KM, Tlapek S, Koegler E. Sex trafficking knowledge and training: implications from environmental scanning in the American Midwest. Violence Vict. 2020;35(3):363–81. https://doi.org/10.1891/VV-D-19-00042. This study identified training rates among service providers and described limitations of current training methodology related to definitional confusion.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Awerbuch A, Gunaratne N, Jain J, Caralis P. Raising awareness of human trafficking in key professional fields via a multidisciplinary educational approach. Int J Hum Rights Healthc. 2020;13(2):159–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-07-2019-0053.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kenny MC, Helpingstine C, Long H, Perez L, Harrington MC. Increasing child serving professionals’ awareness and understanding of the commercial sexual exploitation of children. J Child Sex Abus. 2019;28(4):417–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2018.1563264.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gonzalez-Pons KM, Gezinski L, Morzenti H, Hendrix E, Graves S. Exploring the relationship between domestic minor sex trafficking myths, victim identification, and service provision. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104093.

Lavoie J, Dickerson KL, Redlich AD, Ouas JA. Overcoming disclosure reluctance in youth victims of sex trafficking: new directions for research, policy, and practice. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2019;25(4):225. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000205.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Miller AJ, Arnold-Clark J, Brown KW, Ackerman-Brimberg M, Guymon M. Featured counter trafficking program: the law enforcement first responder protocol. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;2020:100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104173.

Article  Google Scholar 

Talbott JM, Dutcher JS, Pougnier CA, Calvin SL, Roe-Sepowitz D, Kling JM. Review of published curriculum on sex trafficking for undergraduate medical trainees. Am J Prev Med. 2020;58(4):604–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.11.013.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Nyhus-Runtz K, Pederson P, Clay A, Liskowich S, Beaurivage B. Child sexual exploitation: a survey of knowledge and confidence of healthcare providers in Saskatchewan. Canada Child Abus Rev. 2021;30(5):422–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2709. This research explored healthcare providers’ knowledge of sex trafficking, identifying gaps in training and issues related to identification.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pederson AC, Gerassi LB. Healthcare providers’ perspectives on the relevance and utility of recommended sex trafficking indicators: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(2):458–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15019.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chesworth BR, Rizo CF, Franchino-Olsen H, Klein LB, Macy RJ, Martin SL. Protocol schools can use to report commercial sexual exploitation of children to child protective services. Sch Soc Work J. 2020;45(1):40–57.

Google Scholar 

Marburger K, Pickover S. A comprehensive perspective on treating victims of human trafficking. Prof Couns. 2020;10(1):13–24.

Google Scholar 

Barnert E, Kelly M, Godoy S, Abrams LS, Bath E. Behavioral health treatment “Buy-in” among adolescent females with histories of commercial sexual exploitation. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104042.

Cordisco Tsai L, Lim V, Nhanh C. Perspectives of survivors of human trafficking and sexual exploitation on their relationships with shelter staff: findings from a longitudinal study in Cambodia. Br J Soc Work. 2020;50(1):176–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz128.

Article  Google Scholar 

Da Silva IM, Sathiyaseelan A. Emotional needs of women post-rescue from sex trafficking in India. Cogent Psychol. 2019;6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1631584.

• Márquez YI, Deblinger E, Dovi AT. The value of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) in addressing the therapeutic needs of trafficked youth: a case study. Cogn Behav Pract. 2020;27(3):253–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2019.10.001. This paper described the TF-CBT approach to treatment with children who have been sexually trafficked, identifying positive outcomes of the intervention in a case study format.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kinnish K, McCarty C, Tiwari A, Osborne M, Glasheen T, Franchot KK, et al. Featured counter-trafficking program: project intersect. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104132.

Johnson BC. Featured counter-trafficking program: trauma recovery for victims of sex trafficking. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104153.

Mukherjee M. Featured counter-trafficking program: Arpan. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104152.

• Rothman EF, Preis SR, Bright K, Paruk J, Bair-Merritt M, Farrell A. A longitudinal evaluation of a survivor-mentor program for child survivors of sex trafficking in the United States. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104083. This study examined the impact of including individuals with lived experience in intervention programs, findings positive results.

Schnur E, Muirhead J, Steinke C, Huefner J. Shining a light: youth in residential treatment with history of sexual exploitation. Resid Treat Child Youth. 2020;37(1):3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2019.1611399.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chisolm-Straker M, Miller CL, Duke G, Stoklosa H. A framework for the development of healthcare provider education programs on human trafficking part two: survivors. J Hum Traffick. 2020;6(4):410–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2019.1635333.

Article 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif