Reporting Individual-Level Research Results from Neurocognitive and Psychological Research in People Living with HIV: Lessons from Dementia Research

Heaton RK, Clifford D, Franklin D Jr, Woods S, Ake C, Vaida F, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy: CHARTER Study. Neurology. 2010;75:2087–96. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318200d727.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rojas Celis V, Valiente-Echeverría F, Soto Rifo R, Toro-Ascuy D. New challenges of HIV-1 infection: how HIV-1 attacks and resides in the central nervous system. Cells. 2019;8:1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101245.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nebeker C, Leow A, Moore R. From return of information to return of value: ethical considerations when sharing individual-level research data. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71:1081–8. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-190589.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Returning individual research results to participants: guidance for a new research paradigm. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.17226/25094. This consensus study report by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine outlines detailed recommendations on when and how it is appropriate to return individual-level research results generated from biospecimens, based on a review of evidence, ethical and social implications, and operational and regulatory aspects of practice.

Book  Google Scholar 

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Revised Common Rule. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/finalized-revisions-common-rule/index.html. Accessed 12 Apr 2023.

Kirsch AC, Zaccariello MJ, McCormick JB, Sharp RR, Flick RP, Warner DO. Bridging the gap: ethical considerations of providing psychological assessment results in research studies. Ethics Behav. 2021;31:381–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1799793. This work examines ethical challenges associated with return of individual-level results in research that employs psychological assessments and described a process for return of neuropsychological results in a study of anesthesia exposure.

Article  Google Scholar 

Erickson C, Chin N, Johnson S, Gleason C, Clark L. Disclosure of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease biomarker results in research and clinical settings: why, how, and what we still need to know. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021;13:e12150. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12150 This review article outlines key questions related to disclosure of amyloid PET scan results to asymptomatic individuals in a research setting, responds to those questions using data from 45 studies in Alzheimer’s disease, and provides recommendations for biomarker disclosure protocols.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roberts J, Ferber R, Blacker D, Rumbaugh M, Grill J. Disclosure of individual research results at federally funded Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers. Alzheimer Dement (NY). 2021;7:e12213. https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12213.

Article  Google Scholar 

Erickson CM, Chin NA, Ketchum FB, Jonaitis EM, Zuelsdorff ML, Gleason CE, et al. Predictors of willingness to enroll in hypothetical Alzheimer disease biomarker studies that disclose personal results. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2022;36:125–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000490.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fadda M, Fiordelli M, Amati R, Falvo I, Ibnidris A, Hurst S, et al. Returning individual-specific results of a dementia prevalence study: insights from prospective participants living in Switzerland. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;36:207–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5416.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vanderschaeghe G, Schaeverbeke J, Bruffaerts R, Vandenberghe R, Dierick K. Amnestic MCI patients’ experiences after disclosure of the amyloid PET result in a research context. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017;9:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0321-3.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lingler J, Sereika S, Butters M, Cohen A, Klunk W, Knox M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of amyloid positron emission tomography results disclosure in mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16:1330–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12129. This study reports on the first randomized controlled trial of return of PET results on understanding, coping efficacy, and test-related distress among dyads of patients with mild cognitive impairment and caregivers.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vanderschaeghe G, Schaeverbeke J, Bruffaerts R, Vandenberghe R, Dierick K. From information to follow-up: ethical recommendations to facilitate the disclosure of amyloid PET scan results in a research setting. Alzheimers Dement (NY). 2018;4:243–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.04.002. This work uses prior empirical literature on return of results from amyloid PET scans to develop recommendations to facilitate return of amyloid PET research results while minimizing risks.

Article  Google Scholar 

Erdmann P, Langanke M. The ambivalence of early diagnosis – returning results in current Alzheimer research. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15:28–37. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205014666170908101237.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

UNAIDS. Policy brief the greater involvement of people living with HIV (GIPA). 2007. https://data.unaids.org/pub/briefingnote/2007/jc1299_policy_brief_gipa.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2023..

Google Scholar 

Relf MV, Holzemer WL, Holt L, Nyblade L, Caiola CE. A review of the state of the science of HIV and stigma: context, conceptualization, measurement, interventions, gaps, and future priorities. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2021;32:392–407. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNC.0000000000000237.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif