Heaton RK, Clifford D, Franklin D Jr, Woods S, Ake C, Vaida F, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy: CHARTER Study. Neurology. 2010;75:2087–96. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318200d727.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rojas Celis V, Valiente-Echeverría F, Soto Rifo R, Toro-Ascuy D. New challenges of HIV-1 infection: how HIV-1 attacks and resides in the central nervous system. Cells. 2019;8:1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101245.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nebeker C, Leow A, Moore R. From return of information to return of value: ethical considerations when sharing individual-level research data. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71:1081–8. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-190589.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Returning individual research results to participants: guidance for a new research paradigm. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.17226/25094. This consensus study report by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine outlines detailed recommendations on when and how it is appropriate to return individual-level research results generated from biospecimens, based on a review of evidence, ethical and social implications, and operational and regulatory aspects of practice.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Revised Common Rule. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/finalized-revisions-common-rule/index.html. Accessed 12 Apr 2023.
Kirsch AC, Zaccariello MJ, McCormick JB, Sharp RR, Flick RP, Warner DO. Bridging the gap: ethical considerations of providing psychological assessment results in research studies. Ethics Behav. 2021;31:381–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1799793. This work examines ethical challenges associated with return of individual-level results in research that employs psychological assessments and described a process for return of neuropsychological results in a study of anesthesia exposure.
Erickson C, Chin N, Johnson S, Gleason C, Clark L. Disclosure of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease biomarker results in research and clinical settings: why, how, and what we still need to know. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021;13:e12150. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12150 This review article outlines key questions related to disclosure of amyloid PET scan results to asymptomatic individuals in a research setting, responds to those questions using data from 45 studies in Alzheimer’s disease, and provides recommendations for biomarker disclosure protocols.
Roberts J, Ferber R, Blacker D, Rumbaugh M, Grill J. Disclosure of individual research results at federally funded Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers. Alzheimer Dement (NY). 2021;7:e12213. https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12213.
Erickson CM, Chin NA, Ketchum FB, Jonaitis EM, Zuelsdorff ML, Gleason CE, et al. Predictors of willingness to enroll in hypothetical Alzheimer disease biomarker studies that disclose personal results. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2022;36:125–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000490.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fadda M, Fiordelli M, Amati R, Falvo I, Ibnidris A, Hurst S, et al. Returning individual-specific results of a dementia prevalence study: insights from prospective participants living in Switzerland. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;36:207–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5416.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vanderschaeghe G, Schaeverbeke J, Bruffaerts R, Vandenberghe R, Dierick K. Amnestic MCI patients’ experiences after disclosure of the amyloid PET result in a research context. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017;9:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0321-3.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lingler J, Sereika S, Butters M, Cohen A, Klunk W, Knox M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of amyloid positron emission tomography results disclosure in mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16:1330–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12129. This study reports on the first randomized controlled trial of return of PET results on understanding, coping efficacy, and test-related distress among dyads of patients with mild cognitive impairment and caregivers.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vanderschaeghe G, Schaeverbeke J, Bruffaerts R, Vandenberghe R, Dierick K. From information to follow-up: ethical recommendations to facilitate the disclosure of amyloid PET scan results in a research setting. Alzheimers Dement (NY). 2018;4:243–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.04.002. This work uses prior empirical literature on return of results from amyloid PET scans to develop recommendations to facilitate return of amyloid PET research results while minimizing risks.
Erdmann P, Langanke M. The ambivalence of early diagnosis – returning results in current Alzheimer research. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15:28–37. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205014666170908101237.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
UNAIDS. Policy brief the greater involvement of people living with HIV (GIPA). 2007. https://data.unaids.org/pub/briefingnote/2007/jc1299_policy_brief_gipa.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2023..
Relf MV, Holzemer WL, Holt L, Nyblade L, Caiola CE. A review of the state of the science of HIV and stigma: context, conceptualization, measurement, interventions, gaps, and future priorities. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2021;32:392–407. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNC.0000000000000237.
留言 (0)