Background: Metabolic acidosis is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) which can impair the function of multiple organs and accelerate CKD progression to kidney failure. The condition is usually treated with sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), which is an alkali salt. Although effective, alkali therapy has numerous side effects including gastric discomfort and bloating, with many people having difficulty tolerating higher doses. Research has shown that base producing fruit and vegetables may have the ability to increase serum bicarbonate concentrations similar to what is achieved with alkali therapy, but also provides added benefits. This systematic review aims to identify, critically-appraise and meta-analyze findings from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of dietary interventions, including base producing fruit and vegetables, on serum bicarbonate concentrations as well as other factors related to kidney function in adult patients with CKD. Methods: RCTs (in adult participants (18 years of age or older), with CKD will be included in the study. Studies will be excluded if participants are undergoing dialysis or have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring oxygen therapy. The interventions of interest are any dietary intervention aimed at manipulating dietary acid load, compared with usual care, no treatment or placebo. Our primary outcome measure will be changes in serum bicarbonate concentration, while other parameters related to kidney function will be considered as secondary outcomes. A knowledge synthesis librarian developed a literature search strategy for MEDLINE (Ovid). The search strategy was then adjusted for use in Cochrane Central (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate) and CINAHL (EBSCO). Two independent reviewers will select studies for eligibility in Covidence and data extraction will be conducted using a custom MS Excel worksheet. We are planning to perform meta-analysis wherever possible using random effects model. Standardized mean difference (95% confidence interval) and risk ratio will be used to present continuous and dichotomous data, respectively. The assessment of publication bias will be performed using funnel plots and Eggers regression test while I2 statistics will be used to assess heterogeneity. We are planning to perform subgroup analysis to deal with potential heterogeneity.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors