Available online 1 April 2023, 152095
Author links open overlay panel, , , , , , , , AbstractBackgroundGastrointestinal anastomoses are performed in many patients every year. The pathogenesis of aberrant anastomotic healing and the causes of intestinal leakage are not fully understood. The present study gathered and critically evaluated histological quantitative data to deepen current knowledge of anastomotic healing in the small and large intestine and its complications and outline the options for further experimental in vivo research in large porcine animal models.
MethodsThree groups of porcine intestinal anastomoses were compared: small intestine without defect (SI; n=7), small intestine with an additional defect (SID; n=8), and large intestine (LI; n=7). Multilevel sampling (2,112 micrographs) and stereological methods were used for histological quantification of proliferation (Ki-67 immunohistochemistry), neutrophil infiltration (myeloperoxidase staining), vascularity (von Willebrand factor) and type I and type III collagen formation (picrosirius red in polarized light) within the region of anastomosis compared to the region outside of anastomosis.
ResultsQuantitative histological evaluation revealed the following results. i) Proliferation, vascularity, and collagen, but not neutrophils, were more highly expressed within the anastomosis than outside of the anastomosis region. ii) Porcine large and small intestine were not interchangeable based on histological evaluation of surgical experiments. The presence or absence of an additional experimental defect strongly affected healing, but the healing seemed complete after 21 days. iii) The microscopic structure of small intestine segments was more affected by their proximity to the anastomosis than the structure of large intestine segments.
ConclusionsHistological quantification was more laborious than the previously used semiquantitative scoring system evaluating the healing rate of intestinal anastomoses, but it provided detailed maps of biological processes within individual intestine layers. The primary data collected in the study are open and available for power sample analyses to calculate the minimum numbers of samples justified in future experiments on porcine intestines. The porcine intestine is a promising animal model with translational potential for human surgery.
Section snippetsGastrointestinal anastomoses and leaksGastrointestinal anastomoses are performed in thousands of patients annually. However, we do not fully understand the pathogenesis of aberrant anastomotic healing and the causes of intestinal leakage even after a century of research (Binnebösel et al., 2014, Wu et al., 2013). Failure of a gastrointestinal anastomosis leads to leakage, dehiscence and fistulas, which are major complications after abdominal surgery (Kosmidis et al., 2011). Although the surgical technique has continuously improved,
Collection of porcine small and large intestine segmentsAll paraffin-embedded archived tissue blocks (n=22) of porcine small and large intestines were obtained from previous studies (Rosendorf et al., 2020, Rosendorf et al., 2021a, Rosendorf et al., 2021b). No animals were sacrificed for the purpose of the present study. Intestinal samples were taken from 12 female and 10 male Prestice Black-Pied pigs aged 12-14 weeks and weighing 24-48 kg. The animal samples were obtained from a project verifying the effect of various nanofibrous structures on the
RESULTSAll primary morphometric data obtained from the histological quantification are provided in Supplement 1.
Proliferation, vascularity, and collagen, but not neutrophils, were more highly expressed in the anastomosis than outside of the anastomosis regionThe anastomotic region showed increased proliferation compared to outside of the anastomosis region (Suppl. 2 A), which is similar to Grommes et al. (2012). Neutrophilic infiltration (Suppl. 2B) was comparable in all intestine layers within and outside of the anastomosis regions. Rosendorf et al., 2021a, Rosendorf et al., 2021b also did not find any signs of increased inflammation in the intestinal anastomosis. Our findings suggest that the inflammatory phase of anastomosis healing was complete
CONCLUSIONSQuantitative histological evaluation of proliferation, neutrophilic infiltration, vascularity, and collagen formation in 22 samples of porcine small and large intestinal anastomoses revealed the following results. i) Proliferation, vascularity, and collagen, but not neutrophils, were more highly expressed within the anastomosis than outside of the anastomosis region. ii) Porcine large and small intestine were not interchangeable based on histological evaluations of surgical experiments. The
Declaration of Competing InterestThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe study was supported by the Charles University Cooperation Program, research area MED/DIAG, and Project No. NU20J-08-00009, Prevention of intestinal anastomotic leakage and postoperative adhesions using nanofibrous biodegradable materials awarded by The Ministry of Health, Czech Republic. M.G. and A.M. were also supported by Charles University Research Project No. SVV 260 536. Skillful technical support from Ms. Jana Dosoudilova and Mr. Jan Javurek is gratefully acknowledged.
Declarations of interestNone.
REFERENCES (63)M.I. Aznan et al.Effect of Tualang honey on the anastomotic wound healing in large bowel anastomosis in rats-A randomized controlled trialBMC Complement. Altern. Med.
(2016)
P. Belvoncikova et al.Gut Dysbiosis and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Autoimmune DiseasesInt. J. Mol. Sci.
(2022)
M. Binnebösel et al.Influence of CD68+ macrophages and neutrophils on anastomotic healing following laparoscopic sigmoid resection due to diverticulitisInt. J. Colorectal. Dis.
(2014)
T. Blassova et al.Inflammatory cell infiltrates, hypoxia, vascularization, pentraxin 3 and osteoprotegerin in abdominal aortic aneurysms - A quantitative histological studyPLoS One
(2019)
G. Bonanomi et al.Sealing effect of fibrin glue on the healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses: implications for the endoscopic treatment of leaksSurg. Endosc
(2004)
J.W. Bosmans et al.Functional mucous layer and healing of proximal colonic anastomoses in an experimental modelBr. J. Surg
(2017)
J.W. Bosmans et al.Comparison of three different application routes of butyrate to improve colonic anastomotic strength in ratsInt. J. Colorectal Dis.
(2017)
J.W. Bosmans et al.Colorectal anastomotic healing: why the biological processes that lead to anastomotic leakage should be revealed prior to conducting intervention studiesBMC Gastroenterol
(2015)
J.W.A.M. Bosmans et al.International consensus statement regarding the use of animal models for research on anastomoses in the lower gastrointestinal tractInt. J. Colorectal Dis.
(2016)
P. BraskénHealing of experimental colon anastomosisEur. J. Surg
(1991)
Brunicardi, F., Andersen, D., Biliar, T., Dunn, D., Hunter, J., Matthews, J., Pollock, R., 2015. Schwartz’s Principles...S.C. Chow et al.Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research(2008)
I. Cohn et al.Antibiotic protection of colon anastomosesAnn. Surg.
(1955)
M. Costa et al.Motor patterns in the proximal and distal mouse colon which underlie formation and propulsion of fecesNeurogastroenterol. Motil. Off. J. Eur. Gastrointest. Motil. Soc.
(2021)
I. Darby et al.Alpha-smooth muscle actin is transiently expressed by myofibroblasts during experimental wound healingLab. Invest.
(1990)
D.B. de Roy van Zuidewijn et al.The effect of antineoplastic agents on the healing of small intestinal anastomoses in the ratCancer
(1986)
A. Desmoulière et al.Apoptosis mediates the decrease in cellularity during the transition between granulation tissue and scarAm. J. Pathol.
(1995)
A. Dignass et al.Trefoil peptides promote epithelial migration through a transforming growth factor beta-independent pathwayJ. Clin. Invest.
(1994)
J.V. Dovi et al.Accelerated wound closure in neutrophil-depleted miceJ. Leukoc. Biol.
(2003)
A. Froidurot et al.Cellulolytic bacteria in the large intestine of mammalsGut Microbes
(2022)
J. Grommes et al.Comparison of Intestinal Microcirculation and Wound Healing in a Rat ModelJournal of investigative surgery: the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research
(2012)
View full text© 2023 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
留言 (0)