[1] Rao SV, Stone GW. Arterial access and arteriotomy site closure devices. Nat Rev Cardiol 2016; 13: 641−650. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.133 [2] Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Ca- rdiovasc Diagn 1993; 30: 173−178. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810300220 [3] Bertrand OF, Rao SV, Pancholy S, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 1022−1031. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.013 [4] Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9: 1419−1434. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.014 [5] Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention 2017; 13: 851−857. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00079 [6]

Hallett S, Ashurst JV. Anatomy, shoulder and upper limb, hand anatomical snuff box. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.

[7] Kim Y, Bae S, Cho SG, et al. Invasive physiological assessment of myocardial bridge via the left snuffbox approach. Kardiol Pol 2019; 77: 892−893. doi: 10.33963/KP.14916 [8]

Chugh Y, Kanaparthy NS, Piplani S, et al. Comparison of distal radial access versus standard transradial ac- cess in patients with smaller diameter radial Arteries (The distal radial versus transradial access in small transradial ArteriesStudy: D. A. T. A - S. T. A. R study). A. T. A - S. T. A. R study). Indian Heart J 2021; 73: 26−34.

[9]

Pan W, Xu HX, Liu QJ, et al. Comparison of clinical value between right distal radial artery access and right radial artery access in patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Innov Appl 2020; 5: 103−107.

[10]

Soydan E, Akın M. Coronary angiography using the left distal radial approach - An alternative site to conventional radial coronary angiography. Anatol J Cardiol 2018; 19: 243−248.

[11]

Saleem M, Hamilton SA, Pahuja K, et al. Comparing the left distal transradial artery access to traditional ac- cess methods for coronary angiography: a single-center experience. Cardiol Cardiovasc Med 2022; 6: 325−339.

[12]

Bhambhani A, Pandey S, Nadamani AN, Tyagi K. An observational comparison of distal radial and traditional radial approaches for coronary angiography. J Saudi Heart Assoc 2020; 32: 17−24.

[13]

Roghani-Dehkordi F, Zangeneh E, Kermani-Alghoraishi M. Manual versus mechanical compression hemostasis approach after coronary angiography via snuff-box access. Anatol J Cardiol 2021; 25: 177−183.

[14] Gajurel R, Sahi R, Shrestha H, et al. Initial experience on anatomical snuff box approach for coronary angiogram & percutaneous coronary intervention in a tertiary care center Nepal. World J Cardiovasc Dis 2018; 8: 578−587. doi: 10.4236/wjcd.2018.812057 [15]

Lin Y, Sun X, Chen R, et al. Feasibility and safety of the distal transradial artery for coronary diagnostic or interventional catheterization. J Interv Cardiol 2020: 4794838.

[16] Schenke K, Viertel A, Joghetaei N, et al. Distal transradial access for coronary angiography and interventions in everyday practice: data from the TRIANGLE Registry (TwitteR Initiated registry for coronary ANgi- ography in Germany via distaL radial accEss). Cardiol Ther 2021; 10: 241−253. doi: 10.1007/s40119-021-00218-6