Mainali S, Aiyagari V, Alexander S, et al. Proceedings of the Second Curing Coma Campaign NIH Symposium: Challenging the Future of Research for Coma and Disorders of Consciousness. Neurocritical Care. 2022:1–25.

Young MJ, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Ethical considerations in clinical trials for disorders of consciousness. Brain Sci. 2022;12(2):211.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ranganathan P, Aggarwal R. Study designs: part 1–an overview and classification. Perspect Clin Res. 2018;9(4):184.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Frieden TR. Evidence for health decision making—beyond randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(5):465–75.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Singh P, Shen Y, Hunt KK. Trial Design: Overview of Study Designs. Clinical Trials. 2020:37–45.

Anderson JA, Eijkholt M, Illes J. Ethical reproducibility: towards transparent reporting in biomedical research. Nat Methods. 2013;10(9):843–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2564.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stevens RD, Diringer MN. Coma science: the territory and the map. Neurocrit Care. 2021;35(1):24–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Claassen J, Akbari Y, Alexander S, et al. Proceedings of the first curing coma campaign NIH Symposium: challenging the future of research for coma and disorders of consciousness. Neurocrit Care. 2021;35(1):4–23.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. World Health Organization; 2017.

Constantin A. Human subject research: international and regional human rights standards. Health Hum Rights. 2018;20(2):137.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/.

Dommel FW, Alexander D. The Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine of the Council of Europe. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1997;7(3):259–76. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.1997.0023.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alas JK, Godlovitch G, Mohan CM, Jelinski SA, Khan AA. Regulatory framework for conducting clinical research in Canada. Can J Neurol Sci. 2017;44(5):469–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2016.458.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Young MJ. Compassionate care for the unconscious and incapacitated. Am J Bioeth. 2020;20(2):55–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fins JJ, Illes J, Bernat JL, Hirsch J, Laureys S, Murphy E. Neuroimaging and disorders of consciousness: envisioning an ethical research agenda. Am J Bioeth. 2008;8(9):3–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Young M, Peterson A. Neuroethics across the Disorders of Consciousness Care Continuum. 2022:

Peterson A, Young MJ, Fins JJ. Ethics and the 2018 practice guideline on disorders of consciousness: a framework for responsible implementation. Neurology. 2022;98(17):712–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Edlow BL, Claassen J, Schiff ND, Greer DM. Recovery from disorders of consciousness: mechanisms, prognosis and emerging therapies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(3):135–56.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Young MJ, Bodien YG, Giacino JT, et al. The neuroethics of disorders of consciousness: a brief history of evolving ideas. Brain. 2021;144(11):3291–310.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hast Cent Rep. 1987;17(2):20–4.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Fins JJ. Mosaic decisionmaking and reemergent agency after severe brain injury. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2018;27(1):163–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Palmer CR, Rosenberger WF. Ethics and practice: alternative designs for phase III randomized clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1999;20(2):172–86.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pallmann P, Bedding AW, Choodari-Oskooei B, et al. Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):1–15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Angus DC, Alexander BM, Berry S, et al. Adaptive platform trials: definition, design, conduct and reporting considerations. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(10):797.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hendriks S, Grady C, Ramos KM, et al. Ethical challenges of risk, informed consent, and posttrial responsibilities in human research with neural devices: a review. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(12):1506–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Check DK, Weinfurt KP, Dombeck CB, Kramer JM, Flynn KE. Use of central institutional review boards for multicenter clinical trials in the United States: a review of the literature. Clin Trials. 2013;10(4):560–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774513484393.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Davidow AL, Katz D, Reves R, Bethel J, Ngong L. The challenge of multisite epidemiologic studies in diverse populations: design and implementation of a 22-site study of tuberculosis in foreign-born people. Public Health Rep. 2009;124(3):391–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335490912400308.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. Report and recommendations for research with human subjects who lack consent capacity. Accessed December 7, 2022. https://www.health.ny.gov/regulations/task_force/docs/report_human_subjects_research.pdf.

Schembs L, Ruhfass M, Racine E, et al. How does functional neurodiagnostics inform surrogate decision-making for patients with disorders of consciousness? A qualitative interview study with patients’ next of Kin. Neuroethics. 2020;14:327–46.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jox RJ. End-of-life decision making concerning patients with disorders of consciousness. Res Cogitans. 2011;8(1):43–61.

Google Scholar 

Jox RJ, Bernat JL, Laureys S, Racine E. Disorders of consciousness: responding to requests for novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(8):732–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70154-0.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vanhoecke J, Hariz M. Deep brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: systematic review of cases and ethics. Brain Stimul. 2017;10(6):1013–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.08.006.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zulato E, Montali L, Bauer MW. Understanding a liminal condition: Comparing emerging representations of the “vegetative state.” Eur J Soc Psychol. 2021;51(6):936–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2794.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bird-David N, Israeli T. A moment dead, a moment alive: how a situational personhood emerges in the vegetative state in an Israeli Hospital Unit. Am Anthropol. 2010;112(1):54–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01196.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kondziella D, Amiri M, Othman MH, et al. Incidence and prevalence of coma in the UK and the USA. Brain Commun. 2022;4(5):fcac88. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac188.

Article  Google Scholar 

Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology. 2018;91(10):450–60.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kondziella D, Bender A, Diserens K, et al. European Academy of Neurology guideline on the diagnosis of coma and other disorders of consciousness. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(5):741–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14151.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Helbok R, Rass V, Beghi E, et al. The curing coma campaign international survey on coma epidemiology, evaluation, and therapy (COME TOGETHER). Neurocrit Care. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01425-8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kalmar K, Giacino JT. The JFK coma recovery scale-revised. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005;15(3–4):454–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010443000425.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sharrocks K, Spicer J, Camidge DR, Papa S. The impact of socioeconomic status on access to cancer clinical trials. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(9):1684–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.108.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Neumann PJ, Araki SS, Gutterman EM. The use of proxy respondents in studies of older adults: lessons, challenges, and opportunities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(12):1646–54.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elliott MN, Beckett MK, Chong K, Hambarsoomians K, Hays RD. How do proxy responses and proxy-assisted responses differ from what Medicare beneficiaries might have reported about their health care? Health Serv Res. 2008;43(3):833–48.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wendler D. How to enroll participants in research ethically. JAMA. 2011;305(15):1587–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Faden RR, Beauchamp TL, King NMP. A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press; 1986.

Google Scholar 

Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(25):1635–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198812223192504.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fins JJ. Disorders of consciousness and disordered care: families, caregivers, and narratives of necessity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(10):1934–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.028.

Article  PubMed