Sleep features and long-term incident neurodegeneration: a polysomnographic study

Abstract

While a growing body of studies suggests a link between sleep disturbances and neurodegenerative diseases' (NDDs) development, prior studies have been hindered by small sample sizes, short follow-up times and a lack of objective sleep measures. In this cohort study, patients who underwent polysomnography (PSG) at the Innsbruck Sleep Disorders Unit from January 2004 to December 2007, aged ≥18 years, without NDDs at baseline or within five years post PSG, and with at least five years clinical follow-up were included. The main outcome measure was NDDs diagnosis at least five years after polysomnography, assessed until December 2021. Of 1454 patients assessed for eligibility, 999 (68.7%) met inclusion criteria (683 (68.3%) men; median age 54.9 (interquartile range, IQR 33.9-62.7) years. Seventy-five patients (7.5%) developed NDDs, 924 (92.5%) remained disease-free after 12.8 (IQR 9.9-14.6) years median follow-up. After adjusting for demographic, sleep, and clinical covariates, each percent decrease in sleep efficiency, N3 sleep, or REM sleep was associated with 1.9%, 6.5%, and 5.2% increased risk of incident NDDs (hazard ratio, HR, 1.019, CI:1.002-1.035; HR 1.065, CI:1.007-1.118; HR 1.052, CI:1.012-1.085,), respectively whereas one percent decrease in night-time wakefulness represented a 2.2% reduced risk (HR 0.978, CI:0.958-0.997). Random forest analysis identified wake, followed by N3 and REM sleep percentages, as the most important feature associated with NDDs development. Additionally, multiple sleep features combination offered more robust discrimination of incident NDDs compared to single sleep stages. These findings support contribution of sleep architecture changes to NDDs pathogenesis and provide insights into the temporal window during which these changes are detectable, pointing to sleep as early NDDs marker and potential target of neuroprotective strategies.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics committee of the Medical University Innsbruck gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif