Background: Physician specialists (PS) are often the type of healthcare provider initially contacted by an individual with low back pain (LBP). LBP clinical practice guidelines (CPG) recommend a stepped approach to management with an emphasis on first-line non-pharmaceutical and non-interventional services. Objective: Examine the association between the incorporation of CPG recommended first-line services, exposure to second- and third-line services and total episode cost for individuals with non-surgical LBP initially contacting a PS. Design: Retrospective observational study with identical design to previous study focused on primary care physicians. Setting/Patients: National sample of individuals with non-surgical LBP occurring in 2017-2019. Measurements: Independent variables were initial contact with a PS, and the timing of incorporation of five types of first-line services. Dependent measures included exposure to thirteen types of health care services and total episode cost. Results: 91,096 individuals were associated with 98,992 episodes of non-surgical LBP. 36.2% of the 33,277 PS initially contacted for an episode of LBP incorporated any first-line service at any time during an episode. A first-line service was provided in 24.0% of episodes with active care (19.5% of episodes), manual therapy (13.7%) and chiropractic manipulative therapy (6.5%) the most common. 7.3% of non-surgical LBP episodes included a first-line service within seven days of initial contact with a PS. These episodes were associated with a reduction in the use of prescription skeletal muscle relaxants (risk ratio 0.88) and opioids (0.55), spinal injections (0.84), and CT scans (0.71), with no impact on the use of prescription NSAIDs, radiography, or MRI scans. First-line services were associated with an increase in total episode cost at any time of incorporation with chiropractic manipulation associated with the lowest cost increase. Younger individuals from zip codes with higher adjusted gross income were more likely to receive a first-line service in the first seven days of an episode. Limitations: As a retrospective observational analysis of associations there are numerous potential confounders and limitations. Conclusions: Individuals with non-surgical LBP initially contacting a PS infrequently receive a CPG recommended first-line service. If a first-line service is provided it is often later in an episode and typically in addition to second- and third-line services. There is an opportunity to improve concordance with LBP CPGs for individuals with LBP initially contacting a PS.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Because the data was de-identified or a Limited Data Set in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and customer requirements, the UnitedHealth Group Office of Human Research Affairs determined that this study was exempt from Institutional Review Board review.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript