European AIDS Clinical Society. EACS guidelines version 11.0. European AIDS Clinical Society. 2021. https://www.eacsociety.org/media/final2021eacsguidelinesv11.0_oct2021.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2021.

Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. 2021.https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/sites/default/files/guidelines/documents/adult-adolescent-arv/guidelines-adult-adolescent-arv.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2021.

Saag MS, Gandhi RT, Hoy JF, Landovitz RJ, Thompson MA, Sax PE, et al. Antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention of HIV infection in adults: 2020 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel. JAMA. 2020;324:1651–69.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Badowski M, Pérez SE, Silva D, Lee A. Two’s a company, three’s a crowd: a review of initiating or switching to a two-drug antiretroviral regimen in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients living with HIV-1. Infect Dis Ther. 2020;9:185–208.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cahn P, Sierra Madero J, Arribas JR, Antinori A, Ortiz R, Clarke AE, et al. Three-year durable efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in antiretroviral therapy-naive adults with HIV-1 infection. AIDS. 2022;36:39–48.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nickel K, Halfpenny NJA, Snedecor SJ, Punekar YS. Comparative efficacy, safety and durability of dolutegravir relative to common core agents in treatment-naïve patients infected with HIV-1: an update on a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:222.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Radford M, Parks DC, Ferrante S, Punekar Y. Comparative efficacy and safety and dolutegravir and lamivudine in treatment naive HIV patients. AIDS. 2019;33:1739–49.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel DA, Snedecor SJ, Tang WY, Sudharshan L, Lim JW, Cuffe R, et al. 48-week efficacy and safety of dolutegravir relative to commonly used third agents in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e105653.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nickel K, Halfpenny NJ, Snedecor SJ, Punekar YS. Comparative efficacy, safety and durability of dolutegravir relative to common core agents in treatment-naïve patients infected with HIV-1: an update on a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:222.

Google Scholar 

US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection: developing antiretroviral drugs for treatment. Guidance for industry. Food and Drug Administration. 2015. https://www.fda.gov/media/86284/download. Accessed 2 Aug 2021.

Pilkington V, Hughes SL, Pepperrell T, McCann K, Gotham D, Pozniak AL, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: an updated meta-analysis of 14 894 patients across 14 trials. AIDS. 2020;34:2259–68.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, Walter SD. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:683–91.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, Scott DA, Itzler R, Cappelleri JC, et al. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. Value Health. 2011;14:429–37.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Orkin C, DeJesus E, Sax PE, Arribas JR, Gupta SK, Martorell C, et al. Fixed-dose combination bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir-containing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: week 144 results from two randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trials. Lancet HIV. 2020;7:e389–400.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gallant J, Lazzarin A, Mills A, Orkin C, Podzamczer D, Tebas P, et al. Bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (GS-US-380-1489): a double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2063–72.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Snedecor SJ, Radford M, Kratochvil D, Grove R, Punekar YS. Comparative efficacy and safety of dolutegravir relative to common core agents in treatment-naïve patients infected with HIV-1: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:484.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kanters S, Vitoria M, Doherty M, Socias ME, Ford N, Forrest JI, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet HIV. 2016;3:e510–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kanters S, Vitoria M, Zoratti M, Doherty M, Penazzato M, Rangaraj A, et al. Comparative efficacy, tolerability and safety of dolutegravir and efavirenz 400mg among antiretroviral therapies for first-line HIV treatment: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;28:100573.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sax PE, Pozniak A, Montes ML, Koenig E, DeJesus E, Stellbrink H-J, et al. Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (GS-US-380-1490): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2073–82.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cahn P, Sierra Madero J, Arribas JR, Antinori A, Ortiz R, Clarke AE, et al. Dolutegravir plus lamivudine versus dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2): week 48 results from two multicentre, double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2019;393:143–55.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fahrbach K. How similar is "similar"? A deeper dive into Bucher versus Bayesian network meta-analysis. Evidera. 2018. https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/04-How-Similar-is-Similar_Fall2018.pdf. Accessed 23 Jul 2021.

Vadher K, Patel H, Mody R, Levine JA, Hoog M, Cheng AY, et al. Efficacy of tirzepatide 5, 10 and 15 mg versus semaglutide 2 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes: an adjusted indirect treatment comparison. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;24:1861–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bateman ED, Khan AH, Xu Y, Guyot P, Chao J, Kamat S, et al. Pairwise indirect treatment comparison of dupilumab versus other biologics in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma. Respir Med. 2022;191:105991.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Bruin-Weller MS, Serra-Baldrich E, Barbarot S, Grond S, Schuster C, Petto H, et al. Indirect treatment comparison of baricitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022;12:1481–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Llibre JM, Raffi F, Moyle G, Behrens G, Bouee S, Reilly G, et al. An indirect comparison of efficacy and safety of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and abacavir/lamivudine + dolutegravir in initial therapy. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0155406.

Article  Google Scholar