Sweet WH. The uses of nuclear disintegration in the diagnosis and treatment of brain tumor. N Engl J Med. 1951;245:875–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM195112062452301.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wrenn FR Jr, Good ML, Handler P. The use of positron-emitting radioisotopes for the localization of brain tumors. Science. 1951;113:525–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.113.2940.525.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kuhl DE, Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ, Robinson GD Jr, MacDonald NS. Initial clinical experience with 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose for determination of local cerebral glucose utilization by emission computed tomography. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1977;64:192–3.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Petroni D, Menichetti L, Poli M. Historical and radiopharmaceutical relevance of [18F]FDG. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2020;323:1017–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07013-y.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Budinger TF. PET instrumentation: what are the limits? Semin Nucl Med. 1998;28:247–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2998(98)80030-5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ter-Pogossian MM, Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ, Mullani NA. A positron-emission transaxial tomograph for nuclear imaging (PETT). Radiology. 1975;114:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1148/114.1.89.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, et al. A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1369–79.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Virgolini I, Decristoforo C, Haug A, Fanti S, Uprimny C. Current status of theranostics in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:471–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3882-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Czernin J, Sonni I, Razmaria A, Calais J. The future of nuclear medicine as an independent specialty. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:3S–12S. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.220558.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Delbeke D, Segall GM. Status of and trends in nuclear medicine in the United States. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(Suppl 2):24S–8S. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.085688.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mankoff D, Pryma DA. Nuclear medicine training: what now? J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1536–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.190132.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Muylle K, Maffioli L. Nuclear medicine training in Europe: “all for one, one for all”. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1904–5. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.201012.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Neilly B, Dizdarevic S, Prvulovich L, Buscombe J, Lewington V. Nuclear medicine training and practice in the UK. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:800–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3255-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Segall GM, Grady EE, Fair JR, Ghesani MV, Gordon L. Nuclear medicine training in the United States. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1733–4. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.200857.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alberts I, Prenosil G, Sachpekidis C, Weitzel T, Shi K, Rominger A, et al. Digital versus analogue PET in [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for recurrent prostate cancer: a matched-pair comparison. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:614–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04630-y.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rausch I, Ruiz A, Valverde-Pascual I, Cal-Gonzalez J, Beyer T, Carrio I. Performance evaluation of the Vereos PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:561–7. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.215541.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Sluis JJ, de Jong J, Schaar J, Noordzij W, van Snick P, Dierckx R, et al. Performance characteristics of the digital biograph vision PET/CT system. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1031–6. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.215418.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nguyen NC, Vercher-Conejero JL, Sattar A, Miller MA, Maniawski PJ, Jordan DW, et al. Image quality and diagnostic performance of a digital PET prototype in patients with oncologic diseases: initial experience and comparison with analog PET. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1378–85. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.148338.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fuentes-Ocampo F, Lopez-Mora DA, Flotats A, Paillahueque G, Camacho V, Duch J, et al. Digital vs. analog PET/CT: intra-subject comparison of the SUVmax in target lesions and reference regions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1745–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4256-0.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lopez-Mora DA, Flotats A, Fuentes-Ocampo F, Camacho V, Fernandez A, Ruiz A, et al. Comparison of image quality and lesion detection between digital and analog PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1383–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-4260-z.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Sluis J, Boellaard R, Dierckx RA, Stormezand G, Glaudemans A, Noordzij W. Image quality and activity optimization in oncological (18)F-FDG PET using the digital biograph vision PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.234351.

Alberts I, Hünermund J-N, Sachpekidis C, Mingels C, Fech V, Bohn KP, et al. The influence of digital PET/CT on diagnostic certainty and interrater reliability in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for recurrent prostate cancer. Eur Radiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07870-5.

Alberts I, Sachpekidis C, Prenosil G, Viscione M, Bohn KP, Mingels C, et al. Digital PET/CT allows for shorter acquisition protocols or reduced radiopharmaceutical dose in [18F]-FDG PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2021;35:485–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01588-6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zeimpekis KG, Kotasidis FA, Huellner M, Nemirovsky A, Kaufmann PA, Treyer V. NEMA NU 2-2018 performance evaluation of a new generation 30-cm axial field-of-view discovery MI PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05751-7.

Daube-Witherspoon ME, Cherry SR. Scanner design considerations for long axial field-of-view PET systems. PET Clin. 2021;16:25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2020.09.003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cherry SR, Jones T, Karp JS, Qi J, Moses WW, Badawi RD. Total-body PET: maximizing sensitivity to create new opportunities for clinical research and patient care. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:3–12. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.184028.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Karp JS, Viswanath V, Geagan MJ, Muehllehner G, Pantel AR, Parma MJ, et al. PennPET Explorer: design and preliminary performance of a whole-body imager. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:136–43. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229997.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pantel AR, Viswanath V, Karp JS. Update on the PennPET Explorer: a whole-body imager with scalable axial field-of-view. PET Clin. 2021;16:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2020.09.002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Daube-Witherspoon M, Pantel A, Pryma D, Karp J. Total-body PET: a new paradigm for molecular imaging. Br J Radiol. 2022:20220357. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220357.

Lan X, Younis MH, Li K, Cai W. First clinical experience of 106 cm, long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT: an elegant balance between standard axial (23 cm) and total-body (194 cm) systems. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:3755–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05505-x.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alberts I, Hünermund J-N, Prenosil G, Mingels C, Bohn KP, Viscione M, et al. Clinical performance of long axial field of view PET/CT: a head-to-head intra-individual comparison of the Biograph Vision Quadra with the Biograph Vision PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05282-7.

Prenosil GA, Sari H, Furstner M, Afshar-Oromieh A, Shi K, Rominger A, et al. Performance characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view using the NEMA NU 2-2018 standard. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:476–84. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.261972.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gourd K, Collingridge D. Improving the view: the need for global action on universal access to cancer imaging. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:422–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00093-0.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anderson JA. TH-A-I-617-01: PET site planning and radiation safety. Med Phys. 2005;32:2149. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1999747.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sachpekidis C, Pan L, Kopp-Schneider A, Weru V, Hassel JC, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Application of the long axial field-of-view PET/CT with low-dose [(18)F]FDG in melanoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-06070-7.

Vali R, Alessio A, Balza R, Borgwardt L, Bar-Sever Z, Czachowski M, et al. SNMMI procedure standard/EANM practice guideline on pediatric (18)F-FDG PET/CT for oncology 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:99–110. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.254110.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

van Rijsewijk ND, van Leer B, Ivashchenko OV, Scholvinck EH, van den Heuvel F, van Snick JH, et al. Ultra-low dose infection imaging of a newborn without sedation using long axial field-of-view PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05979-3.

Shiyam Sundar LK, Hacker M, Beyer T. Whole-body PET imaging: a catalyst for whole-person research? J Nucl Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264555.

Rahmim A, Lodge MA, Karakatsanis NA, Panin VY, Zhou Y, McMillan A, et al. Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:501–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4153-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tan H, Sui X, Yin H, Yu H, Gu Y, Chen S, et al. Total-body PET/CT using half-dose FDG and compared with conventional PET/CT using full-dose FDG in lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:1966–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05091-4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Duarte PS. Give to Fryback what is Fryback’s, and to new PET technologies what is new PET technologies’. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:2676–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05454-5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sari H, Mingels C, Alberts I, Hu J, Buesser D, Shah V, et al. First results on kinetic modelling and parametric imaging of dynamic (18)F-FDG datasets from a long axial FOV PET scanner in oncological patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05623-6.

Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Pan L, Sachpekidis C. Kinetic modeling and parametric imaging with dynamic PET for oncological applications: general considerations, current clinical applications, and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04843-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar