Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of imatinib for optimal drug repurposing from cancer to COVID-19

ElsevierVolume 184, 1 May 2023, 106418European Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesAuthor links open overlay panel, , , , , , , , , , , , , Highlights•

This is the first study to report exposure-response analyses of oral imatinib in COVID-19 patients.

Higher total imatinib concentrations were found in COVID-19 patients compared to cancer patients, which can be attributed to differences in plasma protein concentrations.

Inverse associations between imatinib exposure and clinical response parameters were found in COVID-19 patients, which may be explained by disease course.

AbstractIntroduction

In the randomized double-blind placebo-controlled CounterCOVID study, oral imatinib treatment conferred a positive clinical outcome and a signal for reduced mortality in COVID-19 patients. High concentrations of alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (AAG) were observed in these patients and were associated with increased total imatinib concentrations.

Aims

This post-hoc study aimed to compare the difference in exposure following oral imatinib administration in COVID-19 patients to cancer patients and assess assocations between pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and pharmacodynamic (PD) outcomes of imatinib in COVID-19 patients. We hypothesize that a relatively higher drug exposure of imatinib in severe COVID-19 patients leads to improved pharmacodynamic outcome parameters.

Methods

648 total concentration plasma samples obtained from 168 COVID-19 patients were compared to 475 samples of 105 cancer patients, using an AAG-binding model. Total trough concentration at steady state (Cttrough) and total average area under the concentration-time curve (AUCtave) were associated with ratio between partial oxygen pressure and fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F), WHO ordinal scale (WHO-score) and liberation of oxygen supplementation (O2lib). Linear regression, linear mixed effects models and time-to-event analysis were adjusted for possible confounders.

Results

AUCtave and Cttrough were respectively 2.21-fold (95%CI 2.07–2.37) and 1.53-fold (95%CI 1.44–1.63) lower for cancer compared to COVID-19 patients. Cttrough, not AUCtave, associated significantly with P/F (β=-19,64; p-value=0.014) and O2lib (HR 0.78; p-value= 0.032), after adjusting for sex, age, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, dexamethasone concomitant treatment, AAG and baseline P/F-and WHO-score. Cttrough, but not AUCtave associated significantly with WHO-score. These results suggest an inverse relationship between PK-parameters, Cttrough and AUCtave, and PD outcomes.

Conclusion

COVID-19 patients exhibit higher total imatinib exposure compared to cancer patients, attributed to differences in plasma protein concentrations. Higher imatinib exposure in COVID-19 patients did not associate with improved clinical outcomes. Cttrough and AUCtave inversely associated with some PD-outcomes, which may be biased by disease course, variability in metabolic rate and protein binding. Therefore, additional PKPD analyses into unbound imatinib and its main metabolite may better explain exposure-response.

Keywords

Drug repurposing

Imatinib

COVID-19

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacodynamics

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif