Brazilian society of rheumatology methodological guide for the development of evidence-based clinical guidelines in rheumatology

The American College of Rheumatology Clinical Practice Guidelines [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.rheumatology.org/Practice-Quality/Clinical-Support/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines.

Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, Ollenschläger G, Phillips S, van der Wees P. Guidelines international network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(7):525–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Neumann A, Vandvik P, Agoritsas T, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, Santesso N, et al. How to use a patient management recommendation: clinical practice guidelines and decision analyses. In: Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade M, Cook D, editors., et al., Users’ guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2015.

Google Scholar 

World Health Organization. WHO handbook for guideline development. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

Google Scholar 

Homik JE, Suarez-Almazor ME. Clinical guidelines: a must for rheumatology? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2000;14(4):649–61.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ferreira CBT. Diretrizes Metodológicas: Elaboração de Diretrizes Clínicas. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia. 2016;62(2):165–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

The ADAPTE Collaboration. [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 30]. Available from: https://g-i-n.net/.

Fervers B, Burgers J, Voellinger R, Brouwers M, Browman G, Graham I, et al. Guideline adaptation: an approach to enhance efficiency in guideline development and improve utilisation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(3):228–36.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Diretrizes Metodológicas: Elaboração de Revisão Sistemática e Meta-análise de Ensaios Clínicos Randomizados. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2021.

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2: framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):395–400.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guyatt G, Meade M, Agoritsas T, Richardson W, Jaeschke R. What is the question? In: Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade M, Cook D, editors. Users’guides to the medical literature: essentials of evidence-based clinical practice. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2015.

Google Scholar 

Diretrizes Metodológicas: Elaboração de Pareceres Técnico-Científico. 4th ed. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2014.

Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, et al., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. version 6.3. Cochrane; 2022.

Suarez-Almazor ME, Belseck E, Homik J, Dorgan M, Ramos-Remus C. Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases: MEDLINE alone is not enough. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21(5):476–87.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clark OAC, Castro AA. Searching the Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) database improves systematic reviews. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(1):112–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

ISSG Search Filters Resource [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 26]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/home.

McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;1(75):40–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;29:372.

Google Scholar 

Covidence: Better systematic review management [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 26]. Available from: https://www.covidence.org/.

DistillerSR|Systematic Review Software|Literature Review Software [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 26]. Available from: https://www.evidencepartners.com/products/distillersr-systematic-review-software.

Rayyan: Intelligent Systematic Review: Rayyan [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 26]. Available from: https://www.rayyan.ai/.

Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;21:358.

Google Scholar 

Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–36.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 26]. Available from: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.

RoB 2: A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials | Cochrane Bias [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 26]. Available from: https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials.

Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;12:i4919.

Article  Google Scholar 

The GRADE Working Group. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. [Internet]. Updated Oct 2013. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. Available from guidelinedevelopment.org/handbook.; 2013 [cited 2022 Dec 14]. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html.

Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11: making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(2):151–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3: rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Andrews JC, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Pottie K, Meerpohl JJ, Coello PA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15: going from evidence to recommendationddeterminants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:726–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Abreu MM, Levy RA, Wahl D. Using the GRADE system in diagnostic strategy: the case of antiphospholipid syndrome. Lupus. 2014;23(12):1292–4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Abreu MM, Danowski A, Wahl DG, Amigo MC, Tektonidou M, Pacheco MS, et al. The relevance of “non-criteria” clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome: 14th international congress on antiphospholipid antibodies technical task force report on antiphospholipid syndrome clinical features. Autoimmun Rev. 2015;14(5):401–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Vist GE, Liberati A, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: going from evidence to recommendations. Br Med J. 2008;336(7652):1049.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mahajan V, Linstone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi method: techniques and applications. J Mark Res. 1976;13(3):317.

Google Scholar 

Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol. 2021;11(4):116–29.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rocha-Filho CR, Cardoso TC, Dewulf N de LS. Método e-delphi modificado: um guia para validação de instrumentos avaliativos na área da saúde. Brazil Publishing; 2019.

Munaretto LF, Corrêa HL, da Cunha JAC. A study on the characteristics of the Delphi method and focus group as techniques to obtain data in exploratory research. Revista de Administração da UFSM. 2013;6(1):9–24.

Article  Google Scholar 

Massaroli A, Martini JG, Lino MM, Spenassato D, Massaroli R. Método DELPHI como referencial metodológico para a pesquisa em enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enfermagem. 2018;26(4):1110017.

Article  Google Scholar 

von der Gracht HA. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2012;79(8):1525–36.

Article  Google Scholar 

Green B, Jones M, Hughes D, Williams A. Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs’ information requirements. Health Soc Care Commun. 1999;7(3):198–205.

Article  Google Scholar 

Diretrizes Metodológicas: Elaboração de Diretrizes Clínicas. 2nd ed. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2020.

Cochrane effective practice and organisation of Care [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 23]. Available from: https://epoc.cochrane.org/.

Vernooij RWM, Sanabria AJ, Solà I, Alonso-Coello P, Martínez GL. Guidance for updating clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review of methodological handbooks. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):1–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shekelle P, Woolf S, Grimshaw JM, Schünemann HJ, Eccles MP. Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):1–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cluzeau F, Burgers J, Brouwers M, Grol R, Mäkelä M, Littlejohns P, et al. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(1):18–23.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tokalić R, Viđak M, Buljan I, Marušić A. Reporting of clinical practice guidelines: practical testing of AGREE and RIGHT checklists. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(7):2167.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brouwers MC, Kerkvliet K, Spithof K. The AGREE Reporting Checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016;8:352.

Google Scholar 

AGREE II: AGREE Enterprise website [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 26]. Available from: https://www.agreetrust.org/resource-centre/agree-ii/.

Chen Y, Yang K, Marušić A, Qaseem A, Meerpohl JJ, Flottorp S, et al. A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(2):128–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schünemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Etxeandia I, Falavigna M, Santesso N, Mustafa R, et al. Guidelines 20: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. Can Med Assoc J. 2014;186(3):E123.

Article  Google Scholar 

GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 30]. Available from: https://cebgrade.mcmaster.ca/guidecheck.html.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif