Bruschke AV, Sheldon WC, Shirey EK, Proudfit WL. A half century of selective coronary arteriography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:2139‐44.
Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA, Sarembock IJ, Powers ER, Gimple LW. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:210‐5.
Hermiller JB, Cusma JT, Spero LA, Fortin DF, Harding MB, Bashore TM. Quantitative and qualitative coronary angiographic analysis: review of methods, utility, and limitations. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;25:110‐31.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chu M, Dai N, Yang J, Westra J, Tu S. A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;33:975‐90.
Tonino PA, de Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t-Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213‐24.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Johnson NP, Toth GG, Lai D, Zhu H, Acar G, Agostoni P, et al. Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1641‐54.
Berry C, Corcoran D, Hennigan B, Watkins S, Layland J, Oldroyd KG. Fractional flow reserve-guided management in stable coronary disease and acute myocardial infarction: recent developments. Eur Heart J 2015;36:3155‐64.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation 2016;134:e123‐55.
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2020;41:407‐77.
Lee HS, Lee JM, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Dai N, et al. Consensus document for invasive coronary physiologic assessment in Asia-Pacific countries. Cardiol J 2019;26:215‐25.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, et al. diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography: the international multicenter FAVOR pilot study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:2024‐35.
Trobs M, Achenbach S, Rother J, Redel T, Scheuering M, Winneberger D, et al. Comparison of fractional flow reserve based on computational fluid dynamics modeling using coronary angiographic vessel morphology versus invasively measured fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 2016;117:29‐35.
Morris PD, Ryan D, Morton AC, Lycett R, Lawford PV, Hose DR, et al. Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: modeling the significance of coronary lesions: results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:149‐57.
Li J, Gong Y, Wang W, Yang Q, Liu B, Lu Y, et al. Accuracy of computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to coronary angiography to derive fractional flow reserve: FLASH FFR. Cardiovasc Res 2020;116:1349‐56.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Agostini D, Roule V, Nganoa C, Roth N, Baavour R, Parienti JJ, et al. First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with (15)O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:1079‐90.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dai N, Hwang D, Lee JM, Zhang J, Tong Y, Jeon KH, et al. Association of quantitative flow ratio with lesion severity and its ability to discriminate myocardial ischemia. Korean Circ J 2021;51:126‐39.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Harrison DG, White CW, Hiratzka LF, Doty DB, Barnes DH, Eastham CL, et al. The value of lesion cross-sectional area determined by quantitative coronary angiography in assessing the physiologic significance of proximal left anterior descending coronary arterial stenoses. Circulation 1984;69:1111‐9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Leone AM, De Caterina AR, De Maria GL, Scalone G, Tagliaferro F, Gardi A, et al. Three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and quantification of jeopardised myocardium to predict functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis. EuroIntervention 2015;11:308‐18.
Dai N, Che W, Liu L, Zhang W, Yin G, Xu B, et al. Diagnostic value of angiography-derived IMR for coronary microcirculation and its prognostic implication after PCI. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:735743.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Choi KH, Dai N, Li Y, Kim J, Shin D, Lee SH, et al. Functional coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14:1670‐84.
Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, Dodge JT Jr, Alexander B Jr, Marble SJ, et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation 1996;93:879‐88.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nakazato R, Tamarappoo BK, Kang X, Wolak A, Kite F, Hayes SW, et al. Quantitative upright-supine high-speed SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease: correlation with invasive coronary angiography. J Nucl Med 2010;51:1724‐31.
Nakazato R, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Fish M, Padgett R, Xu Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with a solid-state camera: simulation of a very low dose imaging protocol. J Nucl Med 2013;54:373‐9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Berman DS, Kiat H, Friedman JD, Wang FP, van Train K, Matzer L, et al. Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1455‐64.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, Wang FP, et al. Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:639‐47.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Engbers EM, Timmer JR, Mouden M, Knollema S, Jager PL, Ottervanger JP. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging with a cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT camera in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2017;58:1459‐63.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Smit JM, Koning G, van Rosendael AR, Dibbets-Schneider P, Mertens BJ, Jukema JW, et al. Relationship between coronary contrast-flow quantitative flow ratio and myocardial ischemia assessed by SPECT MPI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;44:1888‐96.
Ben-Haim S, Kennedy J, Keidar Z. Novel cadmium zinc telluride devices for myocardial perfusion imaging-technological aspects and clinical applications. Semin Nucl Med 2016;46:273‐85.
Nudi F, Iskandrian AE, Schillaci O, Peruzzi M, Frati G, Biondi-Zoccai G. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging with CZT technology: systemic review and meta-analysis of comparison with invasive coronary angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:787‐94.
Oldan JD, Shaw LK, Hofmann P, Phelan M, Nelson J, Pagnanelli R, et al. Prognostic value of the cadmium-zinc-telluride camera: a comparison with a conventional (Anger) camera. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:1280‐7.
Gottsauner-Wolf M, Sochor H, Moertl D, Gwechenberger M, Stockenhuber F, Probst P. Assessing coronary stenosis. Quantitative coronary angiography versus visual estimation from cine-film or pharmacological stress perfusion images. Eur Heart J 1996;17:1167‐74.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Waksman R, Legutko J, Singh J, Orlando Q, Marso S, Schloss T, et al. FIRST: fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound relationship study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:917‐23.
Ghekiere O, Dewilde W, Bellekens M, Hoa D, Couvreur T, Djekic J, et al. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;31:1651‐61.
Kalogeris T, Baines CP, Krenz M, Korthuis RJ. Ischemia/reperfusion. Compr Physiol 2016;7:113‐70.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schuijf JD, Matheson MB, Ostovaneh MR, Arbab-Zadeh A, Kofoed KF, Scholte A, et al. Ischemia and no obstructive stenosis (INOCA) at CT angiography, CT myocardial perfusion, invasive coronary angiography, and SPECT: the CORE320 study. Radiology 2020;294:61‐73.
留言 (0)