Introduction

Redox homeostasis, the balance between the generation and consumption of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells, is one of the most important intracellular physiological equilibriums for cell survival.1–3 ROS, including hydroxyl radicals (•OH), superoxide anions (•O2−), and singlet oxygen (1O2), play an essential role in tumorigenesis, tumor progression, metastasis, and tumor therapy.4–6 ROS modulate various cell signaling pathways, which are primarily mediated through the transcription factors NF-κB and STAT3, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, kinases, growth factors, cytokines and other proteins, and enzymes; these pathways have been linked to inflammation, tumor survival, proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis of cancer.7–9 Nowadays, efficiently breaking the redox homeostasis to boost ROS generation has become the promising strategy for the anticancer treatment. However, due to the abnormalities of tumor tissues, H2O2 was overproduced, which is one of the most important sources of ROS and promotes tumor growth and metastasis.10,11 Moreover, a high concentration of glutathione (GSH, up to 10 mM) is observed in the tumor tissues, which is an important intracellular antioxidant to scavenge the cytotoxic ROS and keep the redox homeostasis.12,13 As a result, boosting ROS generation or depletion of GSH is the main approach to break redox homeostasis. For promotion of ROS production, chemodynamic therapy (CDT) exploits Fenton or Fenton-like reaction to convert endogenous H2O2 into highly toxic •OH for the elimination of tumor cells.14–16 For depletion of GSH, direct GSH oxidation,17 enhancing GSH efflux,18,19 and inhibiting GSH synthesis20,21 are the main strategies to break the redox balance and enhance the therapeutic effect. Therefore, the design and preparation of novel CDT nanomaterials, which could improve intracellular ROS levels and reduce GSH concentration in tumor cells to break the redox homeostasis in tumor tissues, has emerged as optional for tumor-enhanced CDT.22–26

However, GSH depletion enhanced CDT is far from satisfactory due to their strict requirement of H2O2 level and overexpressed glutathione in tumor tissues. Therefore, exploitation of CDT enhancement strategy, such as laser-enhanced CDT performance, is still a challenge. For example, the increasing local temperature at the tumor site can improve the Fenton or Fenton-like reaction rate to augment the efficiency of CDT.27,28 Up to now, considerable efforts have been devoted to develop multifunction nanomaterials for combined CDT/PTT, including Mo2C-derived polyoxometalate,29[email protected]2−xSe core-shell nanocrystals,30 Cu2MoS4 nanocomposites,31 Fe3O4@MIL-100 nanocomposite,32 and Copper-olsalazine MOF.33,34 Therefore, multimodal therapies based on •OH generation, GSH consumption, and photothermal therapy are imperative to maximize the tumor therapeutic effect.

Recently, the near-infrared II photothermal therapy (NIR-II PTT) based on NIR-II absorption nanomaterials has drawn much attention in tumor therapy, which exhibited low toxicity, precise spatiotemporal selectivity, small photonscattering, high specificity, and excellent maximum permissible exposure (MPE,1064 nm: 1 W/cm2).35–37 Previous investigation on NIR-II absorption nanomaterials dominantly focused on noble-metal nanoparticles,38,39 transition metal chalcogenide,40,41 nanocarbons,42,43 rare-earth doped nanoparticles,44,45 two-dimensional (2D) nanosheets,46,47 phosphorus phthalocyanine,48,49 and conducting polymer nanoparticles.50,51 Polyanilines (PANI), as one of conducting polymers, have outstanding potential applications in biomedicine, such as antimicrobial therapy, drug delivery, bone regeneration, nerve regeneration, wound healing, and biosensor, because of their high electrical conductivity and biocompatibility caused by the hydrophilic nature, low-toxicity, good environmental stability, and nanostructured morphology.52,53 Moreover, chemical-modified polyanilines exhibited strong NIR-II absorbance, desirable photothermal-conversion performance, and excellent photostability, which make them good candidates for applications in NIR-II photothermal therapy of tumor.54–57 PANI surely represent a promising, but not yet completely explored, area of NIR-II photothermal therapy of tumor which calls for opportunities of deeper studies and developed research.

Copperphosphotungstate (CuPW), an essential member of polyoxotungstates, has been explored as an excellent catalyst to degrade organic pollutants.58,59 Moreover, CuPW demonstrated the oxidation property for ROS generation and GSH depletion.60 However, the insufficient therapeutic efficiency of CuPW makes its clinical use impractical. Addressing the challenges, in this work, we rationally incorporated the copperphosphotungstate into polyanilines to design copperphosphotungstate doped polyaniline nanorods ([email protected] Nanorods) via chemical oxidant polymerization of aniline. [email protected] Nanorods demonstrate low long-term toxicity and satisfactory biocompatibility. Moreover, [email protected] Nanorods achieve effective NIR-II absorption to thermal ablation cells. Furthermore, by the virtue of Cu2+ ions, these nanorods exhibit the ability to deplete intracellular GSH and convert H2O2 into • OH by a Fenton-like reaction. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments have proven that GSH depletion enhanced CDT/NIR-II PTT synergistic therapy based on [email protected] Nanorods induces the effective ablation of tumors. Hence, this work provides an option to develop a simple and multifunctional nanomedicine to realize GSH depletion, • OH production, and NIR-II PTT for effective tumor ablation.

Materials and Methods The Preparation of Copperphosphotungstate Doped Polyaniline Nanorods

In a typical synthesis procedure of [email protected] Nanorods: aniline (92μL), phosphotungstic acid (188mg), CuSO4 (16 mg), and PVP (200 mg) were added in 18 mL DI water to obtain solution A, which was kept at 5°C. (NH4)2S2O3 (228mg) was added into 10mL DI water to obtain solution B, which was kept at 5 °C. Solution B was drop added into solution A at 5°C and stirred in 5°C for 4 h at 400 rpm. The blue solution was centrifugated under 5600×g (3000 rpm) to remove large particles for 10 min at room temperature. [email protected] Nanorods were obtained via centrifugation under 18,600×g (11000 rpm) for 10 min at room temperature and extensively washed with DI water and ethanol for several times.

Examining Catalytic Activities of Copperphosphotungstate Doped Polyaniline Nanorods by Detecting ROS, ·OH and GSH Consumption Using DCFH, Methylene Blue or DTNB as Indicator

For all experiments, comparison was made without or with 1064 nm laser irradiation (1.0 W/cm2, 5 min). For detection of ·OH generation, [email protected] Nanorods (100 μg/mL) were added in 3 mL methylene blue solution (8 μg/mL), followed by stirring for 30 min. Next, 100 μL H2O2 (1 mM) was added. After different periods of time, the level of ·OH generation was evaluated based on the decrease of absorbance at 617 nm.

To test the ROS production activity of [email protected] Nanorods, DCFH was used as the probe to detect 1O2 production. Briefly, DCFH-DA (0.5 mL) in DMSO was mixed with NaOH (2mL, 0.01 M) for 30 min. Then PBS (10 mL, 25 mM, pH 7.2) was added to form a stock solution of DCFH-DA. [email protected] Nanorods solution (100μg/mL) was mixed with the stock solution of DCFH-DA (10 μM) with or without H2O2 (1 mM). The solutions were placed at room temperature for 2 h. Then the fluorescent spectra were measured to estimate the produced ROS (excitation at 485 nm and emission at 528 nm).

To test GSHOD activity of [email protected] Nanorods, GSH (10 mM, 30 μL) and [email protected] Nanorods (100 μg/mL) were added into PBS solution (1 mL) with or without H2O2 (1 mM) at room temperature. After incubation for 30 min at room temperature, DTNB (Ellman’s Reagent, (5,5-dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid)) solution (3mg/mL, 200 μL) was added and further incubated for 10 min. Oxidation of GSH was quantified by the decrease of absorbance at 412 nm using UV-vis spectroscopy.

Detecting Intracellular ROS and GSH

ROS production was probed by a cell-permeable dye (2,7-dichlorofluorescin diacetate, DCFH-DA), which becomes green fluorescent upon being oxidized to DCF by intracellular ROS. Specifically, 4T1 cells were first seeded in 12-well plates (2 × 104 cells per well) and then cultured for 24 h. Subsequently, the culture medium was replenished and added with DCFH-DA (10 nM). After 20 min, cells were washed thrice with PBS to remove free dyes. Finally, the fluorescence was recorded at 545 nm under 485 nm excitation.

The intracellular GSH was measured by the GSH and GSSG Assay Kit (Beyotime). 4T1cells were seeded in 6-well plates (3 × 106 cells per well) and incubated for 24 h. Then, the culture media were replaced with media containing [email protected] Nanorods (100 μg/mL). After 4 h, each well was replaced with the fresh media containing 10% FBS and the cells were incubated for another 20 h. Then, the cells were collected for GSH and GSSG assay according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Results and Discussion Synthesis and Characterization of Copperphosphotungstate Doped Polyaniline Nanorods

[email protected] Nanorods were synthesized by oxidative chemical polymerization of aniline under phosphotungstic acid, copper (II) sulfate, and ammonium persulphate. In a typical synthetic process, CuSO4, phosphotungstic acid and aniline were mixed with PVP, then ammonium persulphate was added to initiate the polymerization. The reaction was carried out at 5°C for 4h. The mixtures were centrifugated to obtain small blue [email protected] Nanorods.

As exhibited in Figures 1A and S1, the rod-like morphology of [email protected] Nanorods with an axial length of about 180 nm was confirmed by the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images. The hydrodynamic diameter of the as-designed [email protected] Nanorods was verified to be 185 nm, which was consistent with the TEM examination (Figure 1B). Furthermore, the zeta potential of [email protected] Nanorods was determined to be 36.3 mV. Moreover, negligible change in the particle size of [email protected] Nanorods was observed over 14 days (Figure S2). The biodegradation property of [email protected] Nanorods after incubation in various pH solutions (pH =5.0, 6.0, and 7.4) was evaluated by ICP-OES investigation. No apparent release of Cu and W could be observed after 7 days under neutral or acidic condition (Table S1). Apart from that, the morphological change of [email protected] Nanorods under acid milieus was also investigated. As demonstrated in Figure S3, [email protected] Nanorods still preserved the rod-like morphology under acid conditions for long-term. All these results confirmed the excellent stability of [email protected] Nanorods in the physiological medium.

Figure 1 Characterizations of [email protected] Nanorods. (A) The TEM of [email protected] Nanorods. (B) The DLS of [email protected] Nanorods. (C) The IR spectrum of CuPWO4, PANI, [email protected] Nanorods. (D) Elemental mapping of Cu, W, P, C, N, and O in [email protected] Nanorods. (E) The XPS of [email protected] Nanorods. (F) High-resolution XPS spectra of Cu 2p in [email protected] Nanorods. (G) High-resolution XPS spectra of W 4f in [email protected] Nanorods.

The formatted coordination bonds of [email protected] Nanorods were further investigated via Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. As shown in Figure 1C, the peaks of [email protected] Nanorods which were located at 1537, 1371, 1200, and 544 cm−1 were attributed to the bonds from polyaniline. Besides, the band at 1077 and 989 cm−1 of [email protected] Nanorods were attributed to copperphosphotungstate. The chemical composition of [email protected] Nanorods was also verified via energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping. As shown in Figure 1D and E, [email protected] Nanorods consisted of Cu, P, W, O, and N elements, proving the uniform distribution between CuPW and PANI. The atomic composition was also confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Figure 1F and G). According to the well-resolved peaks in Figure 1F, the peaks at 953.3 eV (Cu 2p1/2) and 932.4 eV (Cu 2p3/2) were ascribed to the chemical state of Cu (II). In addition, the two strong peaks at 35.1 eV (W 4f7/2) and 33.2 eV (W 4f5/2) were relevant with the W(VI) valence state. All these results strongly proved the successful fabrication of [email protected] Nanorods.

NIR-II Photothermal Conversion Performance of Copperphosphotungstate Doped Polyaniline Nanorods

The UV-vis-NIR spectra of [email protected] Nanorods in water at different concentrations were investigated. [email protected] Nanorods demonstrated the absorption arranged from 600 to 1100 nm (Figure 2A). The absorbance of [email protected] Nanorods exhibited a linear increase with the increment of concentration. The mass extinction coefficient at 1064 nm was determined to be 9.85 L/g.cm, which was much higher than those of TiO2−x (5.54 L/g.cm)61 and SrCuSi4O10 nanosheets (2.42 L/g.cm)62 (Figure 2B). It seems that [email protected] Nanorods could efficiently collect and convert NIR-II light energy into hyperthermia.

Figure 2 NIR-IIPhotothermal performance of [email protected] Nanorods. (A) UV-vis-NIR spectra of [email protected] Nanorods in water with various concentration. (B) Fitting curve of mass extinction coefficient of [email protected] Nanorods at 1064 nm. (C) Photothermal curves of [email protected] Nanorods with various concentrations (0~100 μg/mL) under 1064 nm laser irradiation (1.0 W/cm2). (D) Temperature elevation curves of [email protected] Nanorods (100 μg/mL) under 1064 nm laser irradiation with different power densities. (E) Temperature curves of [email protected] Nanorods after five heating/cooling cycles. (F) Linear time constant calculated from the cooling period.

To explore the photothermal-conversion capability of [email protected] Nanorods, the temperature variation and corresponding images of [email protected] Nanorods at different concentrations after exposure to 1064 nm laser were explored (Figures 2C and D and S4). For example, the temperature of [email protected] Nanorods aqueous solution (100 μg/mL) increased from room temperature to 55℃ after irradiation (1064 nm, 1.0 W/cm2, 5 min). On the contrary, a slight temperature elevation was observed in the water under the same condition, indicating that [email protected] Nanorods exhibited excellent capacity to transfer NIR-II light energy into thermal energy.

Moreover, the photothermal property of [email protected] Nanorods in water was nearly unchanged after five heating/cooling cycles (Figure 2E), confirming the excellent thermal stability of [email protected] Nanorods. Furthermore, to assess the photothermal stability of [email protected] Nanorods, the UV-vis-NIR spectra of [email protected] Nanorods aqueous solution were explored after continuous 1064 nm laser irradiation. As shown in Figure S5, the UV-vis-NIR spectra of [email protected] Nanorods remained unchanged after 1064 nm laser irradiation for 30 min. All these results confirmed the high photothermal stability of [email protected] Nanorods.

As shown in Figure 2F, the photothermal-conversion efficiency of [email protected] Nanorods was determined to be 45.14%, which is high compared with most of the other NIR-II PTT agents, such as the gold nanoframeworks (23.9%),63 semiconducting copolymer nanoparticles (43.4%),64 MoS2 nanomaterials (43.3%).43 Therefore, all these results verified that [email protected] Nanorods are optional for NIR-II photothermal therapy.

The GSH Depletion and ROS Generation of Copperphosphotungstate Doped Polyaniline Nanorods

The GSH depletion performance of [email protected] Nanorods was exploited using the DTNB as a GSH indicator. After incubation with [email protected] Nanorods, the GSH concentrations were investigated for various durations. As shown in Figure S6, the absorption of DNTB changed slightly, confirming the stability of GSH. As depicted in Figure 3A, the GSH concentrations decreased gradually as incubation time increased. XPS analysis was carried out to verify the oxidation-reduction reaction between [email protected] Nanorods and GSH (Figure 3B). The emergence of Cu+ and the weakening of Cu2+ in the valence state of Cu proved the reduction of copper. In addition, the valence state of W keeps stable (Figure S7). The existence of Cu2+/Cu+ couples endow [email protected] Nanorods with GSH depletion property (Figure 3F).

Figure 3 Characterizations of the redox and Fenton-like reaction of [email protected] Nanorods. (A) GSH depletion by [email protected] Nanorods with DTNB as indicator after different duration. (B) XPS spectrum of [email protected] Nanorods after reaction with GSH. (C) MB degradation by .OH generated by H2O2 and [email protected] Nanorods at different groups. (D) Fluorescent spectrum of DCF for ROS generation. (E) ESR spectrum after different treatment. (F) The illustration of the GSH depletion and Fenton-like performance of [email protected] Nanorods (Up red arrow means the generation of .OH, while the down red arrow means the depletion of GSH).

[email protected] Nanorods were speculated to catalyze H2O2 and generate •OH. Therefore, the Fenton-like reaction activity of [email protected] Nanorods was validated by using the 3,3,5,5-tetramethyl-benzidine (TMB) as indicator. As depicted in Figure S8, with the increment of [email protected] Nanorods concentration, the absorbance value of TMB at 652 nm significantly increases, indicating the production of •OH. In the presence of H2O2, the production of •OH by [email protected] Nanorods was also confirmed with the methylene blue (MB) discoloration experiment. Figure 3C shows the absorption changes of MB after different treatments. The absorbance intensity of MB treated with H2O2, [email protected] Nanorods or [email protected] Nanorods +1064nm was negligible. On the contrary, [email protected] Nanorods + H2O2 groups exhibited apparent absorbance at 617nm, indicating that [email protected] Nanorods have Fenton-like reaction activity. Moreover, the absorbance at 617 nm of [email protected] Nanorods + H2O2 after 1064 nm irradiation was stronger compare to that without 1064 nm irradiation, confirming that photothermal treatment could improve the Fenton-like reaction activity. Simultaneously, the Fenton-like reaction activity of [email protected] Nanorods increased with the increment of H2O2 concentration (Figure S9). It seems that higher H2O2 concentration results in faster MB degradation.

Figure 3D shows the fluorescent changes of DCF after different treatments. As can be seen in Figure 3D, different fluorescent intensity after various treatments were observed. The fluorescent signal in the group treated with H2O2, [email protected] Nanorods or [email protected] Nanorods +1064nm was negligible. On the contrary, the [email protected] Nanorods + H2O2 groups exhibited a fluorescent signal at 450nm, indicating that [email protected] Nanorods have Fenton-like reaction activity. Moreover, the enhanced fluorescent signal was observed in the [email protected] Nanorods + H2O2 with a 1064nm irradiation group, confirming that photothermal treatment could improve the Fenton-like reaction efficacy.

The generation of •OH was further exploited by electron spinning resonance (ESR) spectra with 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) as •OH trapping agent. As demonstrated in Figure 3E, [email protected] Nanorods alone, H2O2 alone, and [email protected] Nanorods plus 1064 nm irradiation could not lead to the production of •OH. After combination [email protected] Nanorods with H2O2, an apparent ESR signal was monitored. Moreover, the ESR signal intensity after 1064 nm irradiation was enhanced, which was consistent with the MB degradation experiments. Therefore, all the results confirmed that [email protected] Nanorods could produce toxic •OH to kill tumor cells (Figure 3F).

In a word, we designed copperphosphotungstate doped polyaniline nanorods to induce the GSH consumption enhanced Fenton-like reaction and NIR-II PTT, having the great potential to augment tumor therapy.

In vitro Therapeutic Efficacy Assessment of Copperphosphotungstate Doped Polyaniline Nanorods

Encouraged by the physicochemical properties and functions of [email protected] Nanorods, in vitro experiments were carried out to investigate the therapeutic efficacy. [email protected] Nanorods exhibited no apparent toxicity to normal cells (L929) whereas they were cytotoxic to tumor cells (4T1) with the increment of concentration (Figure 4A), due to the higher endogenous H2O2 in tumor cells than that in normal cells. The anti-tumor effect was greatly improved by 1064 nm irradiation or the addition of H2O2 incorporation with [email protected] Nanorods (Figures 4B and S10). For example, after treatment with [email protected] Nanorods (100 μg/mL) and H2O2 (200 μM), the enhancement of cytotoxicity was observed and more than 50% death of 4T1 cells was recorded. Moreover, with 100 μg/mL [email protected] Nanorods, 1064 nm irradiation (0.75 W/cm2, 3 min) plus 200μM extracellular H2O2, essentially 94% 4T1 cells were killed. This was ascribed to the GSH depletion by [email protected] Nanorods, the abundant generation of •OH via the Fenton-like reaction incorporated with NIR-II photothermal therapy.

Figure 4 Intracellular investigation of [email protected] Nanorods. (A) Cytotoxicity of L929 and 4T1 cells after incubation with [email protected] Nanorods for 24h. (B) 4T1 cells viability after treatment with [email protected] Nanorods for 4h, then in presence or absence of H2O2 (100 μM) with or without 1064nm irradiation (0.75 W/cm2, 5 min). (C) GSH depletion in cells after incubation with [email protected] Nanorods (0 to 200 μg/mL). (D) Fluorescence images of 4T1 cells after different treatment stained by DCFH-DA. (E) Fluorescence images of 4T1 cells after different treatment stained by JC-1. (F) Fluorescent images of 4T1 cells after different treatment and then stained by PI and Ca-AM. (G) Flow cytometry using Annexin-V-FTIC/PI assay of 4T1 cells after different treatment. In the (D–G), 1. 4T1 cells treated with PBS, 2. 4T1 cells treated with [email protected] Nanorods (100μg/mL), 3. 4T1 cells treated with [email protected] Nanorods (100μg/mL) and H2O2(100μM), 4. 4T1 cells treated with [email protected] Nanorods (100μg/mL) plus NIR-II irradiation (1064 nm laser, 0.75 W/cm2, 5 min), 5. 4T1 cells treated with [email protected] Nanorods (100μg/mL) and H2O2(100μM) plus NIR-II irradiation (1064 nm laser, 0.75 W/cm2, 5 min).

Owing to copperphosphotungstate which could oxidize GSH, it is supposed that intracellular GSH could be consumed by [email protected] Nanorods. Hence, the GSH level in tumor cells after treatment with [email protected] Nanorods was further investigated. As demonstrated in Figure 4C, the reduction of GSH level in 4T1 cells was observed after incubation with [email protected] Nanorods, which could be attributed to the copperphosphotungstate-mediated oxidation.

To explore ROS production in vitro, DCFH-DA was utilized as the probe. As displayed in Figure 4D, a negligible green fluorescence was observed from the PBS or [email protected] Nanorods alone group. 4T1 cells treated with [email protected] Nanorods plus 1064 nm irradiation exhibited weak green fluorescence due to the finite •OH production. Interestingly, in the presence of H2O2, strong green fluorescence was observed in [email protected] Nanorods group, implying the generation of •OH. Notably, 4T1 cells presented conspicuous green fluorescence image after treated with [email protected] and H2O2 under 1064 nm irradiation. It seems that the hydroxyl radical generation ability of [email protected] Nanorods could be enhanced with NIR-II laser-induced hyperthermia.

To investigate the dysfunction of mitochondria after different treatment, the JC-1 staining experiment was carried out to explore the mitochondrial membrane potential. As demonstrated in Figure 4E, only the red fluorescence could be detected in the PBS group, confirming the no change in mitochondrial membrane potential. Only a slightly enhanced green fluorescence was observed in 4T1 cells after treatment with [email protected] Nanorods, whereas the modest fluorescent ratio between the green with red could be detected in the group ([email protected] Nanorods plus 1064 nm irradiation) and group ([email protected] Nanorods and H2O2), confirming the damage of mitochondria. To our surprise, only the green fluorescence was observed in the group ([email protected] Nanorods+ H2O2 + 1064 nm laser), indicating the damage of abundant mitochondria. These results evidently prove that the local hyperthermia generated from [email protected] Nanorods with 1064 nm irradiation plus the CDT might kill efficiently tumor cell.

Next, the Calcein-AM and PI assay was used to investigate the cell apoptosis. As demonstrated in Figure 4F, only [email protected] Nanorods could not result in noticeable cell death. However, after treatment with [email protected] Nanorods and H2O2, evident cell death was observed through the depletion of GSH and chemodynamic combination therapy. Moreover, [email protected] Nanorods plus 1064nm irradiation could also result in cell death, which was ascribed to the NIR-II laser-induced hyperthermia. As expected, after [email protected] Nanorods and H2O2 plus 1064nm irradiation, the optimal therapeutic effect was achieved through the GSH depletion, •OH generation, and hyperthermia combination therapy.

The quantitative analysis based on flow cytometry further demonstrated that the proportions of apoptotic cells were 1.4%, 6.8%, 17.4%, 10.4%, and 83.3% in the cells after being treated by PBS, [email protected] Nanorods, [email protected] Nanorods + 1064 nm laser, [email protected] Nanorods +H2O2, and [email protected] Nanorods +H2O2 +1064 nm laser, respectively (Figure 4G). This result was in accordance with the Calcein-AM/PI and CCK-8 results and confirmed the interaction between [email protected] Nanorods and tumor cells. All these results confirmed that [email protected] Nanorods own outstanding GSH depletion enhanced CDT/NIR-II PTT for tumor elimination.

In vivo Biocompatibility and Biodistribution Assessment of Copperphosphotungstate Doped Polyaniline Nanorods

The biocompatibility of [email protected] Nanorods was investigated for latent therapeutic application. The BALB/C mice were intravenously injected with various doses of [email protected] Nanorods (0, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg). The body weights of all the mice were recorded every 4 days, and negligible weight change was observed in all groups (Figure S11). Moreover, routine blood chemistry analysis was carried out postinjection of [email protected] Nanorods. As depicted in Figure S12, no significant difference in blood indexes of the mice in all groups was detected. Furthermore, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining experiments of the main organs in all groups were performed to assess the histocompatibility of [email protected] Nanorods. As demonstrated in Figure S13, there are no significant pathological abnormalities or inflammatory lesions in all groups. All these results proved that [email protected] Nanorods possess satisfactory biocompatibility for further therapeutic utility.

Inspired by the desirable NIR-II absorption, the potential of [email protected] Nanorods as photoacoustic (PA) imaging agents was evaluated. The PA signals and imaging of [email protected] Nanorods in water with various concentrations were recorded. As displayed in Figure 5A, the PA signal intensity enhanced with the increment of [email protected] Nanorods concentrations in the range of 0~200μg/mL. Moreover, the enhanced PA signal was detected in the 4T1 cells after incubation with [email protected] Nanorods (Figure 5B). Furthermore, after intravenous injection of [email protected] Nanorods, PA imaging of 4T1 breast tumor-bearing mice were carried out (Figure 5C and D). The maximum PA signal at tumor region at 12 h after injection was recorded. Therefore, [email protected] Nanorods featured high potential for PA imaging-guided CDT/NIR-II PTT.

Figure 5 The Biodistribution of [email protected] Nanorods (A) The PA intensity and imaging of [email protected] Nanorods with different concentration. (B) The PA intensity and imaging of 4T1 cells incubated with or without [email protected] Nanorods. (C) The PA imaging of 4T1-bearing mice after injection of [email protected] Nanorods (The tumor area was marked with pink circle). (D) The quantity analysis of PA intensity in tumor after injection of [email protected] Nanorods. (E) The Cu concentration in different organic tissues after injection of [email protected] Nanorods.

Before assessing the therapeutic effect in vivo, the biodistribution of [email protected] Nanorods in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice was evaluated. The major organs and tumor tissues were gathered at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after intravenous injection of [email protected] Nanorods, and the content of the Cu element was determined. As displayed in Figure 5E, the highest tumor accumulation of the composite was observed at 12 h postinjection in consonance with the PA imaging experiment. Moreover, obvious distribution was also observed in liver, spleen, and kidney due to the blood circulation and the capture of reticuloendothelial system. Based on the consequences of PA imaging and the biodistribution examination, the NIR-II photothermal therapy was carried out at 12h after injection of [email protected] Nanorods via the tail vein.

In vivo Synergistic CDT/NIR-II PTT Performance of Copperphosphotungstate Doped Polyaniline Nanorods

To further explore the in vivo therapeutic effect of [email protected] Nanorods, thirty mice bearing 4T1 tumor were randomly divided into five groups (PBS, [email protected] Nanorods, [email protected] Nanorods +1064 nm laser, [email protected] Nanorods+H2O2, and [email protected] Nanorods +H2O2+1064 nm laser). The tumor regions were irradiated by the 1064 nm laser at 12h after intravenous injection of [email protected] Nanorods. The temperature and thermal images of the tumor sites were recorded by a thermal imaging camera (Figure 6A and B). The temperature at the tumor site in the group treated by [email protected] Nanorods + 1064 nm laser elevated quickly and reached 50.5°C within 5 min, confirming the high photothermal capability of [email protected] Nanorods. On the contrary, a slight temperature increase (3°C) in the tumor region was detected in the control groups (PBS+1064 nm laser).

Figure 6 The therapeutic effect of [email protected] Nanorods. (A) Photothermal images of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice administration with PBS (control) or [email protected] Nanorods after 1064 nm laser irradiation (0.75 W/cm2) for different durations. (B) The temperature of tumor sites change. (C) The body weight of mice after different treatments. (D) Growth curves of tumors in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice after different treatments. (E) Tumor weight after different treatments. (F) The photo of tumor after different treatments. (G) H&E and Tunnel staining of tumors with different treatments.

After various treatments, the tumor volumes and body weights of mice in all groups were recorded every 2 days. There are no significant weight loss in all groups, suggesting the high biosafety of [email protected] Nanorods (Figure 6C). As shown in Figure 6D, little tumor inhibition could be observed in the PBS group or [email protected] Nanorods group. To our surprise, the [email protected] Nanorods +1064nm group or [email protected] Nanorods +H2O2 group exhibited moderate tumor suppression, suggesting NIR-II PTT or CDT alone cannot efficiently inhibit tumor. Furthermore, synergistic therapy of NIR-II PTT and CDT significantly inhibited tumor, confirming the superior therapeutic effect of CDT/NIR-II PTT combination therapy compared to NIR-II PTT or CDT alone. Moreover, the digital photography and tumor weights also proved the most tumor suppression in “combination therapy” group (Figure 6E and F). All these results confirmed the higher therapeutic effect of NIR-II PTT plus CDT, compare to NIR-II PTT or CDT alone.

H&E staining of tumor tissues were also carried out to assess the therapeutic efficacy in all groups (Figure 6G). There is modesty necrosis with deformed nuclei in the [email protected] Nanorods + 1064 nm or [email protected] Nanorods +H2O2 group, compared to the PBS group. Moreover, most serious necrosis with distorted nuclei was detected in the [email protected] Nanorods + 1064 nm +H2O2 group. Then, the Tunnel staining of tumor tissues in all groups were performed to evaluate apoptosis of tumor cells after different treatment (Figure 6G). The proportion of proliferation tumor cells in the [email protected] Nanorods + 1064 nm group or [email protected] Nanorods +H2O2 group decreased, respectively, while the percentage of apoptotic cells increased after administration of [email protected] Nanorods + 1064 nm +H2O2. These results proved that CDT/NIR-II PTT combination therapy could inhibit tumor and induce tumor cell apoptosis.

Conclusion

In general, we fabricated a novel copperphosphotungstate doped polyanilines nanorods ([email protected] Nanorods) to disrupt the redox homeostasis in tumor cells. [email protected] Nanorods featured strong NIR-II absorbance and high photothermal-conversion efficiency (45.14%). Moreover,