Final survival analysis of topotecan and paclitaxel for first-line treatment of advanced cervical Cancer: A NRG oncology randomized study

ElsevierVolume 171, April 2023, Pages 141-150Gynecologic OncologyAuthor links open overlay panel, , , , , , , , , , , , Highlights•

Topotecan plus paclitaxel is not superior to cisplatin plus paclitaxel for recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer.

Topotecan-paclitaxel plus bevacizumab is not superior to cisplatin-paclitaxel plus bevacizumab for cervical cancer.

The non‑platinum doublet, topotecan-paclitaxel, should not be routinely used for recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer.

AbstractObjective

To determine whether a non‑platinum chemotherapy doublet improves overall survival (OS) among patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical carcinoma.

Methods

Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240 is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, clinical trial that studied the efficacy of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 days 1–3 (n = 223) vs cisplatin 50 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 135 or 175 mg/m2 (n = 229), in 452 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. Each chemotherapy doublet was also studied with and without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg). Cycles were repeated every 21 days until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or complete response. The primary endpoints were OS and the frequency and severity of adverse effects. We report the final analysis of OS.

Results

At the protocol-specified final analysis, median OS was 16.3 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) and 13.8 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone) (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91–1.38; p = 0.28). Median OS for cisplatin-paclitaxel and topotecan-paclitaxel was 15 vs 12 months, respectively (HR 1.10; 95% CI,0.82–1.48; p = 0.52), and for cisplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab and topotecan-paclitaxel-bevacizumab was 17.5 vs 16.2 months, respectively (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 0.86–1.56; p = 0.34). Among the 75% of patients in the study population previously exposed to platinum, median OS was 14.6 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) vs 12.9 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone), respectively (HR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86–1.38;p = 0.48). Post-progression survival was 7.9 (cisplatin-paclitaxel backbone) vs 8.1 months (topotecan-paclitaxel backbone) (HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75–1.19). Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was similar between chemotherapy backbones.

Conclusions

Topotecan plus paclitaxel does not confer a survival benefit to women with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer, even among platinum-exposed patients. Topotecan-paclitaxel should not be routinely recommended in this population. NCT00803062.

Keywords

Cervical Cancer

Topotecan

Paclitaxel

Platinum

Recurrent

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif