Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, Tatagari S, Esteves SC, Harlev A, Henkel R et al (2016) Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian J Androl 18:296

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Godin B (2006) On the origins of bibliometrics. Scientometrics 68:109–133

Article  Google Scholar 

Neylon C, Wu S (2009) level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact. PLoS Biol 7:e1000242

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fenner M (2014) Altmetrics and other novel measures for scientific impact. Opening science. Springer, Cham, pp 179–189

Google Scholar 

Sener H, Polat OA (2022) Altmetric analysis of the most-cited 100 articles on the retina published between 2010 and 2020. Retina 42:283–289

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Johnson N (2010) Accuracy and reproducibility of artemis central flap thickness and visual outcomes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms. J Refract Surg 26:107–119

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hjortdal JØ, Vestergaard AH, Ivarsen A, Ragunathan S, Asp S (2012) Predictors for the outcome of small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia. J Refract Surg 28:865–871

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S (2011) Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:127–137

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M (2011) Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 95:335–339

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blum M, Täubig K, Gruhn C, Sekundo W, Kunert KS (2016) Five-year results of small incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Br J Ophthalmol 100:1192–1195

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ang M, Tan D, Mehta JS (2012) Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Trials 13:1–5

Article  Google Scholar 

M S (2021) The Current State of SMILE vs. LASIK. https://www.reviewofophthalmology.com/article/the-current-state-of-smile-vs-lasik. Accessed 15 Nov 2022

Asahi MG, Pakhchanian H, Doepker C, Raiker R, Gallemore RP (2021) A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited papers in retinal detachment. J Vitreoretin Dis 5:467–478

Article  Google Scholar 

Schargus M, Kromer R, Druchkiv V, Frings A (2018) The top 100 papers in dry eye–a bibliometric analysis. Ocul Surf 16:180–190

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bulut E, Celebi ARC, Dokur M, Dayi O (2021) Analysis of trending topics in glaucoma articles from an altmetric perspective. Int Ophthalmol 41:2125–2137

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Flynn E, Pakhchanian H, Sohal P, Gupta R, Raiker R, Asahi MG et al (2022) Top 100 most cited papers in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis surgery: a bibliometric analysis. Semin Ophthalmol 37:531–537

Denoyer A, Landman E, Trinh L, Faure J-F, Auclin F, Baudouin C (2015) Dry eye disease after refractive surgery: comparative outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus LASIK. Ophthalmology 122:669–676

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cartwright VA, McGhee CN (2005) Ophthalmology and vision science research: part 1: understanding and using journal impact factors and citation indices. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:1999–2007

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Garfield E (2006) The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA Ophthalmol 295:90–93

CAS  Google Scholar 

Tomer C (1986) A statistical assessment of two measures of citation: the impact factor and the immediacy index. Inf Process Manag 22:251–258

Article  Google Scholar 

Villaseñor-Almaraz M, Islas-Serrano J, Murata C, Roldan-Valadez E (2019) Impact factor correlations with Scimago journal rank, source normalized impact per paper, Eigenfactor score, and the CiteScore in radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging journals. Radiol Med 124:495–504

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Djulbegovic M, Kalahasty K, Watane A, Jabori SK, Al-Khersan H, Sridhar J (2022) Correlation between altmetric attention scores and citations for articles published in high-impact factor ophthalmology journals from 2018 to 2019. JAMA Ophthalmol 140:623–627

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chien JL, Sabharwal J, Namoglu EC, Ghassibi MP, Yuan M, Gandy C et al (2022) The 100 most mentioned glaucoma articles online with highest altmetric attention scores. J Glaucoma 31:8–14

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wiley ZC, Boyd CJ, Ananthasekar S, Bhat N, Bindiganavile SH, Lee AG (2021) Examining the relationship between Altmetric score and traditional bibliometrics in the ophthalmology literature for 2013 and 2016 cohorts. J Acad Ophthalmol 13:e89–e95

Article  Google Scholar 

Bornmann L (2014) Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. J Informet 8:895–903

Article  Google Scholar 

Kuçuk B, Sirakaya E (2020) An analysis of YouTube videos as educational resources for patients about refractive surgery. Cornea 39:491–494

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, Shen Q, Jia Y, Zhou D, Zhou J (2016) Clinical outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK used to treat myopia: a meta-analysis. J Refract Surg 32:256–265

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M (2014) Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes. Eye Vis 1:1–12

Article  Google Scholar 

Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22:338–342

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yeung AWK (2019) Comparison between Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and publishers for mislabelled review papers. Curr Sci 116:1909–1914

Article  Google Scholar