Authors Andrea Michielan, Elettra Merola, Filippo Vieceli, Teresa Marzia Rogger, Federica Crispino, Chiara Sartori, Nicola Libertà Decarli, Giovanni de Pretis, Nicolò de Pretis.

Background Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (pEMR) is routinely employed for large laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). Recurrence rates following pEMR are still unclear, especially when cap-assisted EMR (EMR-c) is performed. We assessed the recurrence rates and recurrence risk factors post-pEMR for large colorectal LSTs, including both wide-field EMR (WF-EMR) and EMR-c.

Methods This was a single-center, retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent pEMR for colorectal LSTs ≥20 mm at our institution between 2012 and 2020. Patients had a postresection follow-up period of at least 3 months. A risk factor analysis was carried out using the Cox regression model.

Results The analysis included 155 pEMR: 51 WF-EMR and 104 EMR-c, with a median lesion size of 30 (range: 20-80) mm and a median endoscopic follow up of 15 (range: 3-76) months. Overall, disease recurrence occurred in 29.0% of cases; there was no significant difference in recurrence rates between WF-EMR and EMR-c. Recurrent lesions were safely managed by endoscopic removal, and at risk analysis lesion size was the only significant risk factor for recurrence (mm; hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.06, P=0.02).

Conclusions Recurrence of large colorectal LSTs after pEMR occurs in 29% of cases. This rate is mainly dependent on lesion size, and the use of a cap during pEMR has no effect on recurrence. Prospective controlled trials are needed to validate these results.

Keywords Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection, laterally spreading tumors, cap, recurrence, risk factors

Ann Gastroenterol 2023; 36 (2): 195-202