A Systematic review and Network Meta-analysis of pharmaceutical interventions used to manage chronic pain

Abstract

Background It is estimated 1.5 billion of the global population suffer from chronic pain with prevalence increasing with demographics including age. It is suggested long term exposure to chronic could cause further health challenges reducing peoples quality of life. Therefore, it is imperative to use effective treatment options. Purpose We explored the current pharmaceutical treatments available for chronic pain management to better understand drug efficacy and pain reduction. Methods A systematic methodology was developed and published in PROSPERO (CRD42021235384). Keywords of opioids, acute pain, pain management, chronic pain, opiods, NSAIDs, and analgesics were used across PubMed, Science direct, ProQuest, Web of science, Ovid Psych INFO, PROSPERO, EBSCOhost, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and EMBASE. All randomised controlled clinical trials, epidemiology and mixed-methods studies published in English between the 1st of January 1990 and 30th of April 2022 were included. Data synthesis A total of 119 studies were included. The data was synthesised using a tripartied statistical methodology of a meta analysis, pairwise meta analysis and network meta analysis. Limitations Small sample sizes, lack of uniformity with pain assessments and suboptimal clinical trial designs were observed within the pooled data. Conclusion Chronic pain is a public health problem that requires far more effective pharmaceutical interventions with minimal better side effect profiles which will aid to develop better clinical guidelines. The importance of understanding ubiquity of pain by clinicians, policy makers, researchers and academic scholars is vital to prevent social determinant which aggravates issues.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The source data is available in the public domain and can be viewed using search engines such as Pubmed, Science direct etc.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif