Anatomical Description of Anterior Parametrium: A Probable Answer to Pelvic Recurrence Following Radical Hysterectomy

Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira MA, Ribeiro R (2018) Phase III randomized trial of laparoscopic or robotic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: LACC trial. Gynecol Oncol 1(149):245

Article  Google Scholar 

Puntambekar SP, Patil AM, Rayate NV, Puntambekar SS, Sathe RM, Kulkarni MA (2010) A novel technique of uterine manipulation in laparoscopic pelvic oncosurgical procedures: “The uterine hitch technique”

Puntambekar SP, Palep RJ, Puntambekar SS, Wagh GN, Patil AM, Rayate NV, Agarwal GA (2007) Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(6):682–689

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Puntambekar SP, Agarwal GA, Joshi SN, Rayate NV, Puntambekar SS, Sathe RM (2010) Robotic radical hysterectomy: applying principles of the laparoscopic Pune technique. J Robot Surg 4(4):259–264

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Possover M (2021) The “modified Schauta-Stoeckel “procedure. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 28(3):391

Laterza RM, Uccella S, Casarin J, Morosi C, Serati M, Koelbl H, Ghezzi F (2016) Recurrence of early stage cervical cancer after laparoscopic versus open radical surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26(3):547–552

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Toptas T, Simsek T (2014) Total laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in stage IA2–IB1 cervical cancer: disease recurrence and survival comparison. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 24(6):373–378

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhu T, Chen X, Zhu J, Chen Y, Yu A, Chen L, Shou H, Wu M, Zhang P (2017) Surgical and pathological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or para-aortic lymph node sampling for bulky early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27(6)

Yan X, Li G, Shang H, Lin F, Yang X, Zheng F (2012) Outcome and prognostic factors of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in 148 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22(2)

Kanno K, Andou M, Yanai S, Toeda M, Nimura R, Ichikawa F, Teishikata Y, Shirane T, Sakate S, Kihira T, Hamasaki Y (2019) Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 45(12):2425–2434

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liang Z, Chen Y, Xu H, Li Y, Wang D (2010) Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: description of technique and outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 119(2):202–207

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang W, Chu HJ, Shang CL, Gong X, Liu TY, Zhao YH, Huang JM, Yao SZ (2016) Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage IA2 to IIA2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26(7)

Nica A, Kim SR, Gien LT, Covens A, Bernardini MQ, Bouchard-Fortier G, Kupets R, May T, Vicus D, Laframboise S, Hogen L (2020) Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame? Int J Gynecol Cancer 30(12)

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif