Psychometric Performance of the Memory Complain Scale among Colombian Individuals of 60 Years and Older

Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Campo-Arias A.a· Reyes-Ortiz C.A.b

Author affiliations

aFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia
bMedicine School, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, USA

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article Organize, annotate and mark up articles Printing and downloading restrictions apply

Start free trial

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Research Article

Received: August 16, 2022
Accepted: October 24, 2022
Published online: February 14, 2023

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 1420-8008 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9824 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DEM

Abstract

Introduction: The Memory Complaint Scale (MCS-15) is a 15-item instrument to explore frequent forgetfulness in daily life in people with possible cognitive impairment. However, knowledge about its psychometric performance is limited. Objective: The objective of this study was to know the dimensionality and internal consistency of the MCS-15 in Colombian older adults. Methods: A probabilistic sample of 1,957 older adults from the general Colombian population was taken, aged between 60 and 98 years (mean = 71.0 ± 7.9), and 62.2% were women. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega) and dimensionality (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis) were calculated for the original and ten-item versions. Results: The 15-item version showed Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega of 0.91, and one dimension accounted for 45.3% of the variance. A version of ten items showed Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega of 0.89 and a single factor that explained 50.9% of the variance with better indicators in the confirmatory factor analysis. Convergence with the shortened Mini-Mental State Examination was rs = 0.43 (p < 0.001), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test was rs = 0.38 (p < 0.001). The nomological validity with the geriatric depression scale was rs = 0.44 (p < 0.001), and women scored higher than men (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The MCS-15 shows high internal consistency with poor dimensionality. However, a ten-item version shows high internal consistency and a clear one-dimensional structure. More research is needed: testing the performance against a structured interview for major cognitive impairment.

© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel

References Sachdev PS, Blacker D, Blazer DG, Ganguli M, Jeste DV, Paulsen JS, et al. Classifying neurocognitive disorders: the DSM-5 approach. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(11):634–42. McDonald WM. Overview of neurocognitive disorders. Focus. 2017;15(1):4–12. Cano CA, Ruiz A, Plata S, Matallana DL, Montañés P, Benito M, et al. Capacidad operativa de una prueba de tamizado en diagnóstico temprano de la enfermedad de Alzheimer. Rev Colomb Geriatr Gerontol. 2002;16(4):428–9. Pellicer-Espinosa I, Díaz-Orueta U. Cognitive screening instruments for older adults with low educational and literacy levels: a systematic review. J Appl Gerontol. 2022;41(4):1222–31. Keszei AP, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurement scales. J Psychosom Res. 2010;68(4):319–23. Reise SP, Waller NG, Comrey AL. Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychol Assess. 2000;12(3):287–97. Schmand B, Jonker C, Hooijer C, Lindeboom J. Subjective memory complaints may announce dementia. Neurology. 1996;46(1):121–5. Moreno-Carrillo C, Lopera-Restrepo F. Efectos de un entrenamiento cognitivo sobre el estado de ánimo. Rev Chile Neuropsicol. 2010;5(2):146–52. Jorm AF, Jacomb PA. The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): socio-demographic correlates, reliability, validity and some norms. Psychol Med. 1989;19(4):1015–22. Morales JM, Gonzalez-Montalvo JI, Bermejo F, Del Ser T. The screening of mild dementia with a shortened Spanish version of the “Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly”. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1995;9(2):105–11. Montejo P, Montenegro M, Sueiro MJ, Huertas E. Cuestionario de Fallos de Memoria de la Vida Cotidiana (MFE). Análisis de factores con población española. analesps. 2014;30(1):320–8. Jorm AF, Christensen H, Korten AE, Jacomb PA, Henderson AS. Memory complaints as a precursor of memory impairment in older people: a longitudinal analysis over 7-8 years. Psychol Med. 2001;31(3):441–9. Jorm AF, Masaki KH, Davis DG, Hardman J, Nelson J, Markesbery WR, et al. Memory complaints in nondemented men predict future pathologic diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2004;63(10):1960–1. Kielb S, Rogalski E, Weintraub S, Rademaker A. Objective features of subjective cognitive decline in a United States National database. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(12):1337–44. Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Cano-Gutiérrez C, Borda MG, Reyes-Ortiz C, Arciniegas AJ, Samper-Ternent R. Assessment of factors associated with functional status in 60 years-old and older adults in Bogotá, Colombia. Biomedica. 2017;37(0):57–65. Icaza MG, Albala C. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) del estudio de la demencia en Chile: análisis estadístico. Serie Investigaciones en Salud Pública. Washington, D.C.: OPS; 1999. [Sitio en Internet]. Acceso el 16 de octubre de 2017. Available from: http://www.paho.org/spanish/hdp/hdr/serie07composite.pdf. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9. Yesavage JA, Sheikh JI. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol. 1986;5(1–2):165–73. Pedraza OL, Ana María Salazar AM, Sierra FA, Soler D, Castro J, Castillo P, et al. Confiabilidad, validez de criterio y discriminante del Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test, en un grupo de adultos de Bogotá. Acta Med Colomb. 2016;40(4):221–8. Gómez-Angulo C, Campo-Arias A. Escala de Yesavage para depresión geriátrica (GDS-15 y GDS-5): estudio de la consistencia interna y estructura factorial. Univ Psychol. 2011;10(3):715–23. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334. McDonald RP. Theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis and alpha factor analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1970;23(1):1–21. Bartlett MS. Test of significance in factor analysis. Br J Stat Psychol. 1950;3(2):77–85. Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31–6. Ding L, Velicer WF, Harlow LL. Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J. 1995;2(2):119–43. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1–55. Rosselli D, Ardila A, Pradilla Ardila G, Morillo L, Bautista Lorenzo LE, Rey O, et al. El examen mental abreviado (Mini-Mental State Examination) como prueba de selección para el diagnóstico de demencia: estudio poblacional colombiano. Rev Neurol. 2000;30(05):428–32. Moreno LP, Matallana DL, Cano CA. Actuales retos diagnósticos a partir de un análisis de características sociodemográficas de 2453 pacientes de una Clínica de Memoria y Cognición. Acta Neurol Colomb. 2015;31(1):27–38. O'Neill ME, Mathews KL. Levene tests of homogeneity of variance for general block and treatment designs. Biometrics. 2002;58(1):216–24. Kendall MG. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika. 1938;30(1/2):81–9. Hambleton RK. Good practices for identifying differential item functioning. Med Care. 2006;44(11 Suppl 3):S182–8. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2020. Statistical analysis System (SAS), versión 9.4. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute; 2015. StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2013. Del Rosal AB, Costas CSL, Bruno JS, Osinski IC. El juicio contra la hipótesis nula: muchos testigos y una sentencia virtuosa. Psicothema. 2001;13(1):173–8. Banjongrewadee M, Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Pipanmekaporn T, Punjasawadwong Y, Mueankwan S. The role of perceived stress and cognitive function on the relationship between neuroticism and depression among the elderly: a structural equation model approach. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):25–8. Láo GC, De Melo S. Prevalence of cognitive deficit in elderly with depressive symptoms: developing topics. Alzheimer Dement. 2020;16:e047446. Cansel N, Yakaryilmaz FD. The relationship between malnutrition, depressive symptoms, and cognitive impairment in geriatric patients. Med Rec. 2022;4(2):217–23. Su H, Zhou Y, Sun Y, Cai Y. The relationship between depression and subjective cognitive decline in older adults of China: the mediating role of general self-efficacy. Psychol Health Med. 2022:1–11. (Online ahead of print) Blackburn DJ, Wakefield S, Shanks MF, Harkness K, Reuber M, Venneri A. Memory difficulties are not always a sign of incipient dementia: a review of the possible causes of loss of memory efficiency. Br Med Bull. 2014;112(1):71–81. Burmester B, Leathem J, Merrick P. Subjective cognitive complaints and objective cognitive function in aging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent cross-sectional findings. Neuropsychol Rev. 2016;26(4):376–93. Campo-Arias A, Alejandro Pineda-Roa C. Instrument validation is a necessary, comprehensive, and permanent process. Alpha Psychiatry. 2022;23(2):89–90. Ross R. The significance of psychometric properties validation of translated tools. J Nurs Meas. 2022;30(1):3–4. Schweigert WA. Research methods in psychology: a handbook. 4th ed. Long Grove: Waveland Press; 2021. Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Research Article

Received: August 16, 2022
Accepted: October 24, 2022
Published online: February 14, 2023

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 1420-8008 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9824 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DEM

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif