Lose G, Griffiths D, Hosker G, et al. Standardisation of urethral pressure measurement: report from the standardisation subcommittee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;22:258–60.

Google Scholar 

Enhorning G. Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intraurethral pressure. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1961;276:1–68.

Google Scholar 

Brown M, Wickham JEA. The urethral pressure profile. Br J Urol. 1969;41:211–7.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Asmussen M, Ulmsten U. Simultaneous urethrocystometry and urethral pressure profile measurements with a new technique. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1975;54:385–6.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Abrams PH, Martin S, Griffiths DJ. The measurement and interpretation of urethral pressures obtained by the method of Brown and Wickham. Br J Urol. 1978;50:33–8.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Weber AM. Is urethral pressure profilometry a useful diagnostic test for stress urinary incontinence? Obstet Gynecol Survey. 2001;56:720–35.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Van Geelen JM, Doesburg WH, Martin CB Jr. Female urethral pressure profile; reproducibility, axial variation and effects of low dose oral contraceptives. J Urol. 1984;131:394–8.

Google Scholar 

Asmussen M. Intraurethral pressure recording. A comparison between tip-transducer catheters and open-end catheters with constant flow. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10:1–6.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Hilton P. The urethral pressure profile at rest: an analysis of variance. Neurourol Urodyn. 1982;1:303–11.

Google Scholar 

Reyes H, Weil A. Reproducibility of simultaneous urethrocystometry measured with electronic microtransducers. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1983;15:129–40.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Plante P, Susset J. Studies of the urethral pressure profile. I. The normal urethral pressure profile. J Urol. 1980;123:64–9.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Wang AC, Chen MC. A comparison of urethral pressure profilometry using microtip and double lumen catheters in women with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;109:322–6.

Google Scholar 

Kuhn A, Nager CW, Hawkins E, Schulz J, Stanton SL. A comparative study of water perfusion catheters and microtip transducer catheters for urethral pressure measurements. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18:932–5.

Google Scholar 

Couri BM, Bitzos S, Bhardwaj D, et al. Performance analysis of the t-doc air-charged catheters: an alternate technology for urodynamics. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:619–25.

Google Scholar 

Abrams P, Damasar MS, Niblett P, et al. Air filled, including “Air-charged”, catheters in urodynamic studies: does the evidence justify their use? Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:1234–42.

Google Scholar 

Zehnder P, Roth B, Burkhard F, Kessler TM. Air-charged and microtip catheters cannot be used interchangeably for urethral pressure measurement: a prospective single-blind randomized trial. J Urol. 2008;180:1013–7.

Google Scholar 

Digesu GA, Derpapas A, Robshaw P, et al. Are the measurement of water-filled and air-charged catheters the same in urodynamics. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:123–30.

Google Scholar 

Slack M, Culligan P, Tracey M, et al. Relationship of urethral retro-resistance pressure to urodynamic measurements and incontinence severity. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:109–14.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Klarskov N, Lose G. Urethral pressure reflectometry versus urethral pressure profilometry: a comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy. BJU Int. 2007;100:351–6.

Google Scholar 

Elser DM, London W, Fantl JA, McBride MA, Beck RP. A comparison of urethral profilometry using microtip and fiberoptic catheters. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10:371–4.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Culligan PJ, Goldberg RP, Sand PK, et al. Comparison of microtransducer and fiberoptic catheters for Urodynamic studies. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:253–7.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Sörensen S, Norgaard JP, Knudsen LM, Ritting S, Djurhuus JC. Urethral pressure variations in healthy females during rest and sleep. J Urol. 1987;137:1287–90.

Google Scholar 

Tapp A, Cardozo L, Versi E, Studd J. The prevalence of variation of resting urethral pressure in women and its association with lower urinary tract function. Br J Urol. 1988;61:314–7.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Kulseng HS. Prevalence and pattern of unstable urethral pressure in 174 gynecologic patients referred for urodynamic investigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;146:895–900.

Google Scholar 

Kulseng HS. Urethral pressure variation. A review. Int Urogynecol J. 1993;4:366–72.

Google Scholar 

Henriksson L, Andersson KE, Ulmsten U. The urethral pressure profile in continent and stress incontinent women. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1979;13:5–19.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Bunne G, Obrink A. Urethral closure pressure with stress. A comparison between stress incontinent and continent women. Urol Res. 1978;6:127–34.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Susset J, Plante P. Studies of female pressure profile. II. Urethral pressure profile in female incontinence. J Urol. 1980;123:70–4.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Hilton P, Stanton SL. Urethral pressure measurements by microtransducer. The results in symptom-free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;90:919–33.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Faysal MH, Constantino CE, Rother LF, Govan DE. The impact of bladder neck suspension on the resting and stress urethral pressure profile: a prospective study comparing controls with incontinent patients preoperatively and postoperatively. J Urol. 1981;125:55–60.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Kapoor DS, Housami F, White P, et al. Maximum urethral closure pressure: normative data and evaluation as a diagnostic test. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:1613–8.

Google Scholar 

Thind P, Bagi P, Lose G, Mortensen S. Characterization of pressure changes in lower urinary tract during coughing with special reference to the demands on the pressure recording equipment. Neurourol Urodyn. 1994;13:219–25.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Groenendijk PM, Heesakkers JP, Ouwerkerk TJ, Lycklama A, Nijeholt AA. Urethral instability: current pathophysiological concept. Urologia Int. 2009;83:125–33.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Sand P, Bowen L, Ostergard D. Uninhibited urethral relaxation: an unusual cause of incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:645–8.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Obrink A, Bunne G, Ingelman Sundberg A. Pressure transmission to the pre-urethral space in stress incontinence. Urol Res. 1978;6:135–9.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Westby M, Asmussen M, Ulmsten U. Location of the maximum intraurethral pressure related to urogenital diaphragm in the female subject as studied by simultaneous urethrocystometry and voiding urethrocystography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;15(144):408–12.

Google Scholar 

Constantinou C, Govan D. Spatial distribution and timing of transmitted and reflexly generated urethral pressure in healthy women. J Urol. 1982;127:964–9.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Petros P, Ulmsten U. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1990;69(Suppl 153):1–79.

Google Scholar 

Delancey JOL. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1713–23.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Delancey JOL. Structural aspects of the extrinsic continence mechanism. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72:296–301.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Versi E, Cardozo L, Cooper DJ. Urethral pressures: analysis of transmission pressure ratios. Br J Urol. 1991;68:266–70.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Bump RC, Copeland WE, Hurt WG, Fantl WA. Dynamic urethral pressure profilometry: pressure transmission ratio determinations in stress-incontinent and stress-continent subjects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159:749–55.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Theofrastous PW, Bump RC. Pressure transmission ratio reproducibility in stress continent and stress incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn. 1997;16:161–6.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Burden H, Warren K, Abrams P. Leak point pressures: how useful are they? Curr Opin Urol. 2015;25:317–22.

Google Scholar 

Bump RC, Elser DM, Theofrastous JP, McClish DK; The Continence Program for Women Research Group. Valsalva leak point pressure in women with genuine stress incontinence: reproducibility, effect of catheter caliber, correlations with other measures of urethral resistance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:551–7.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Swift S, Utrie J. The need for standardization of the Valsalva leak-point pressure. Int Urogynecol J. 1996;7:227–30.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Nager C, Schulz J, Stanton S, Monga A. Correlation of urethral closure pressure, leak-point pressure and incontinence severity measures. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12:395–400.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Schick E, Dupont C, Bertrand P, Jolivet-Tremblay M, Tessier J. Predictive value of maximum urethral closure pressure, urethral hypermobility and urethral incompetence in the diagnosis of clinically significant female genuine stress incontinence. J Urol. 2004;171:1871–5.

Google Scholar 

Sand P, Bowen L, Panganiban P, Ostergard D. The low-pressure urethra as a factor in failed retropubic urethropexy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:399–372.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Han JY, Park J, Choo MS. Long term durability, functional outcomes and factors associated with surgical failure of tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014;46:1921–7.

Google Scholar 

Delancey J, Trowbridge E, Miller J, Morgan D, et al. Stress urinary incontinence: relative importance of urethral support and urethral closure pressure. J Urol. 2008;179:2286–90.

Google Scholar 

Nager CH, Brubaker L, Heather J, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1987–97.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Maclennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity, mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;107:1460–70.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:1150–7.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Grodstein F, Fretts R, Lifford K, Resnick N, Curhan G. Association of age, obstetric history with urinary symptoms in the Nurses Health Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:428–34.

Google Scholar 

Milsom I, Altman D, Cartwricht R, et al. Committee I in Incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, editors. Epidemiology of urinary incontinence and other lower urinary tract symptoms, pelvic organ prolapse and anal incontinence. 6th ed. Paris: Health Publications; 2017. p. 17–35.

Pfisterer MHD, Griffiths DJ, Schaefer W, Resnick NM. The effect of age on lower urinary tract function: a study in women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:405–12.

Google Scholar 

Trowbridge ER, Wei JT, Fenner DE, Ashton-Miller JA, Delancey JOL. Effects of aging on lower urinary tract and pelvic floor function in nulli-parous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:715–20.

Google Scholar 

Rud T. Urethral pressure profile in continent women from childhood to old age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1980;59:331–5.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Edwards L, Malvern J. The urethral pressure profile: theoretical considerations and clinical application. Br J Urol. 1974;46:325–35.

CAS  Google Scholar