Melzack R, Kinch R, Dobkin P, Lebrun M, Taenzer P. Severity of labour pain: influence of physical as well as psychologic variables. Can Med Assoc J 1984; 130: 579–84.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Brownridge P. The nature and consequences of childbirth pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 59: S9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(95)02058-z

Article  Google Scholar 

Lavand’homme P. Chronic pain after vaginal and cesarean delivery: a reality questioning our daily practice of obstetric anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2010; 19: 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.09.003

Hawkins JL. Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1503–10. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmct0909254

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association. OAA/AAGBI Guidelines for Obstetric Anaesthetic Services 2013. Available from URL: https://www.oaa-anaes.ac.uk/assets/_managed/editor/File/Guidelines/obstetric_anaesthetic_services_2013.pdf (accessed October 2022).

Song Y, Du W, Zhou S, et al. Effect of dural puncture epidural technique combined with programmed intermittent epidural bolus on labour analgesia onset and maintenance: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2021; 132: 971–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000004768

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo CE. Computer-integrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a preliminary study on a novel approach of providing pain relief in labour. Singapore Med J 2006; 47: 951–6.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo C. A comparison of a basal infusion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 673–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000253236.89376.60

Article  Google Scholar 

Saravanakumar K, Garstang JS, Hasan K. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for labour: a survey of UK practice. Int J Obstet Anesth 2007; 16: 221–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.01.010

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Westmoreland CL, Hoke JF, Sebel PS, Hug CC Jr, Muir KT. Pharmacokinetics of remifentanil (GI87084B) and its major metabolite (GI90291) in patients undergoing elective inpatient surgery. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 893–903. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199311000-00005

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Van der Vyver M, Halpern S, Joseph G. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 459–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aef217

Article  Google Scholar 

Heesen M, Böhmer J, Klöhr S, Hofmann T, Rossaint R, Straube S. The effect of adding a background infusion to patient-controlled epidural labour analgesia on labour, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2015; 121: 149–58. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000000743

Article  Google Scholar 

George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labour analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2013; 116: 133–44. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3182713b26

Article  Google Scholar 

Hussain N, Lagnese CM, Hayes B, et al. Comparative analgesic efficacy and safety of intermittent local anaesthetic epidural bolus for labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2020; 125: 560–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.060

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Liu X, Zhang H, Zhang H, Guo M, Gao Y, Du C. Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0234353. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234353

Sng BL, Zeng Y, de Souza NN, et al. Automated mandatory bolus versus basal infusion for maintenance of epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 5: CD011344. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd011344.pub2

Tzeng IS, Kao MC, Pan PT, et al. A meta-analysis of comparing intermittent epidural boluses and continuous epidural infusion for labour analgesia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 7082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197082

Article  Google Scholar 

Xu J, Zhou J, Xiao H, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing programmed intermittent bolus and continuous infusion as the background infusion for parturient-controlled epidural analgesia. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 2583. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39248-5

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lee M, Zhu F, Moodie J, Zhang Z, Cheng D, Martin J. Remifentanil as an alternative to epidural analgesia for vaginal delivery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Clin Anesth 2017; 39: 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.03.026

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Schnabel A, Hahn N, Broscheit J, et al. Remifentanil for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012; 29: 177–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0b013e32834fc260

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Weibel S, Jelting Y, Afshari A, et al. Patient-controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus alternative parenteral methods for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 4: CD011989. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd011989.pub2

Haidl F, Rosseland LA, Rørvik AM, Dahl V. Programmed intermittent boluses vs continuous epidural infusion in labour using an adrenaline containing solution: a randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2020; 64: 1505–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13689

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ojo OA, Mehdiratta JE, Gamez BH, Hunting J, Habib AS. Comparison of programmed intermittent epidural boluses with continuous epidural infusion for the maintenance of labour analgesia: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Anesth Analg 2020; 130: 426–35. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000004104

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Roofthooft E, Barbé A, Schildermans J, et al. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus vs. patient-controlled epidural analgesia for maintenance of labour analgesia: a two-centre, double-blind, randomised study. Anaesthesia 2020; 75: 1635–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15149

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264–9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016; 5: 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Sterne JA, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366: I4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

Article  Google Scholar 

Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. Available from URL: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.1/ (accessed September 2022).

Chaimani A, Higgins JP, Mavridis D, Spyridonos P, Salanti G. Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS One 2013; 8: e76654. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076654

Chaimani A, Salanti G. Visualizing assumptions and results in network meta-analysis: the network graphs package. Stata J 2015; 15: 905–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1501500402

Article  Google Scholar 

Sadeghirad B, Foroutan F, Zoratti MJ, et al. Theory and practice of Bayesian and frequentist frameworks for network meta-analysis. BMJ Evid Based Med 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2022-111928

Article  Google Scholar 

Salanti G, Del Giovane C, Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Higgins JP. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e99682. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099682

Mantha VR, Vallejo MC, Ramesh V, Phelps AL, Ramanathan S. The incidence of maternal fever during labour is less with intermittent than with continuous epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008; 17: 123–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.07.006

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Skrablin S, Grgic O, Mihaljevic S, Blajic J. Comparison of intermittent and continuous epidural analgesia on delivery and progression of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 31: 134–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2010.542840

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Chua SM, Sia AT. Automated intermittent epidural boluses improve analgesia induced by intrathecal fentanyl during labour. Can J Anesth 2004; 51: 581–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03018402

Article  Google Scholar 

Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005; 14: 305–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.05.004

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Fettes PD, Moore CS, Whiteside JB, Mcleod GA, Wildsmith JW. Intermittent vs continuous administration of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl for analgesia during labour. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 359–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael157

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lim Y, Chakravarty S, Ocampo CE, Sia AT. Comparison of automated intermittent low volume bolus with continuous infusion for labour epidural analgesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 894–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x1003800514

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Mukherjee S, Das S, Mukhopadhyay S, Rangan Basu SR. Comparison between continuous epidural infusion and intermittent epidural bolus of bupivacaine fentanyl combination for labour analgesia. Sch J Appl Med Sci 2013; 1: 953–8. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2013.v01i06.0067

Patkar CS, Vora K, Patel H, Shah V, Modi MP, Parikh G. A comparison of continuous infusion and intermittent bolus administration of 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.0002% fentanyl for epidural labour analgesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2015; 31: 234–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.155155

Ferrer LE, Romero DJ, Vásquez OI, Matute EC, Van de Velde M. Effect of programmed intermittent epidural boluses and continuous epidural infusion on labour analgesia and obstetric outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296: 915–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4510-x

Article  Google Scholar 

Fidkowski CW, Shah S, Alsaden MR. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus as compared to continuous epidural infusion for the maintenance of labour analgesia: a prospective randomized single-blinded controlled trial. Korean J Anesthesiol 2019; 72: 472–8. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19156

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ferrante FM, Lu L, Jamison SB, Datta S. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: demand dosing. Anesth Analg 1991; 73: 547–52. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199111000-00006

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Gambling DR, Huber CJ, Berkowitz J, et al. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour: varying bolus dose and lockout interval. Can J Anesth 1993; 40: 211–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03037032

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lee Y, Chae Y, Oh Y, Kim H, Chung C. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour and delivery. Korean J Anesthesiol 1997; 32: 280. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.1997.32.2.274

Article  Google Scholar 

Smedvig JP, Soreide E, Gjessing L. Ropivacaine 1 mg/ml, plus fentanyl 2 μg/ml for epidural analgesia during labour. Is mode of administration important? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 595–9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045005595.x

Ledin Eriksson S, Gentele C, Olofsson CH. PCEA compared to continuous epidural infusion in an ultra-low-dose regimen for labour pain relief: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 1085–90. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00207.x

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Moralar DG, Türkmen UA, Altan A, Arisoy R, Tahaoǧlu E, Özakin E. The comparison of epidural continuous infusion and epidural patient controlled bolus administration in labour analgesia [Turkish]. Agri 2013; 25: 19–26. https://doi.org/10.5505/agri.2013.50465

Article  Google Scholar 

Lovach-Chepujnoska M, Nojkov J, Joshevska-Jovanovska S, Domazetov R. Continuous versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labour analgesia and their effects on maternal motor function and ambulation. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki) 2014; 35: 75–83. https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2014-0010

Article  Google Scholar 

Torlak S, Sahin T, Balaban O, Solak M, Toker K. Comparison of patient controlled analgesia and continuous infusion for epidural labour analgesia: a prospective, randomized study. Anestezi Dergisi 2016; 24: 246–51.

Google Scholar 

Boutros A, Blary S, Bronchard R, Bonnet F. Comparison of intermittent epidural bolus, continuous epidural infusion and patient controlled-epidural analgesia during labour. Int J Obstet Anesth 1999; 8: 236–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-289x(99)80103-4

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Collis RE, Plaat FS, Morgan BM. Comparison of midwife top-ups, continuous infusion and patient-controlled epidural analgesia for maintaining mobility after a low-dose combined spinal-epidural. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 233–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/82.2.233