Wandling MW, Hungness ES, Pavey ES, Stulberg JJ, Schwab B, Yang AD, et al. Nationwide assessment of trends in choledocholithiasis management in the united states from 1998 to 2013. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):1125–30.

Article  Google Scholar 

Singh AN, Kilambi R. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(9):3763–76.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhu HY, Xu M, Shen HJ, Yang C, Li F, Li KW, et al. A meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015;39(5):584–93.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, Kilambi R, Kumar S, Krishna A, et al. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(3):875–85.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ding G, Cai W, Qin M. Single-stage vs. two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(5):947–51.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lu J, Cheng Y, Xiong XZ, Lin YX, Wu SJ, Cheng NS. Two-stage vs single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(24):3156–66.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, et al. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9:CD03327.

Google Scholar 

Baucom RB, Feurer ID, Shelton JS, Kummerow K, Holzman MD, Poulose BK. Surgeons, ERCP, and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: do we need a standard approach for common bile duct stones? Surg Endosc. 2016;30(2):414–23.

Article  Google Scholar 

Warner RL, Coleman KC, Musgrove KA, Bardes JM, Borgstrom DC, Grabo DJ. A review of general surgery resident experience in common bile duct exploration in the ERCP era. Am J Surg. 2020;220(4):899–904.

Article  Google Scholar 

Drake FT, Horvath KD, Goldin AB, Gow KW. The general surgery chief resident operative experience: 23 years of national ACGME case logs. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(9):841–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bucholz EM, Sue GR, Yeo H, Roman SA, Bell RH Jr, Sosa JA. Our trainees’ confidence: results from a national survey of 4136 US general surgery residents. Arch Surg. 2011;146(8):907–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fonseca AL, Reddy V, Longo WE, Gusberg RJ. Graduating general surgery resident operative confidence: perspective from a national survey. J Surg Res. 2014;190(2):419–28.

Article  Google Scholar 

Trehan A, Barnett-Vanes A, Carty MJ, McCulloch P, Maruthappu M. The impact of feedback of intraoperative technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(6): e006759.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bohnen JD, George BC, Williams RG, Schuller MC, DaRosa DA, Torbeck L, et al. The Feasibility of real-time intraoperative performance assessment with SIMPL (system for improving and measuring procedural learning): early experience from a multi-institutional trial. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(6):e118–30.

Article  Google Scholar 

Williams RG, Sanfey H, Chen XP, Dunnington GL. A controlled study to determine measurement conditions necessary for a reliable and valid operative performance assessment: a controlled prospective observational study. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):177–87.

Article  Google Scholar 

DaRosa DA, Zwischenberger JB, Meyerson SL, George BC, Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, et al. A theory-based model for teaching and assessing residents in the operating room. J Surg Educ. 2013;70(1):24–30.

Article  Google Scholar 

George BC, Teitelbaum EN, Meyerson SL, Schuller MC, DaRosa DA, Petrusa ER, et al. Reliability, validity, and feasibility of the Zwisch scale for the assessment of intraoperative performance. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(6):e90–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu B. Sentiment analysis and opinion mining: Morgan & Claypool; 2012.

Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser L, Polosukhin I. Attention is all you need. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, 4-9 December 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017. p. 6000–10.

Qiu XP, Sun TX, Xu YG, Shao YF, Dai N, Huang XJ. Pre-trained models for natural language processing: a survey. Sci China Technol Sci. 2020;63(10):1872–97.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brown T, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan JD, Dhariwal P, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2020;33:1877–901.

Google Scholar 

Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:181004805. 2018.

Socher R, Perelygin A, Wu J, Chuang J, Manning CD, Ng AY, et al. editors. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing; 2013.

Sanh V, Debut L, Chaumond J, Wolf T. DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter. arXiv preprint arXiv:191001108. 2019.

Hinton G, Vinyals O, Dean J. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:150302531. 2015;2(7).

Wolf T, Debut L, Sanh V, Chaumond J, Delangue C, Moi A, et al. Huggingface's transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:191003771. 2019.

Boyle E, Al-Akash M, Gallagher AG, Traynor O, Hill AD, Neary PC. Optimising surgical training: use of feedback to reduce errors during a simulated surgical procedure. Postgrad Med J. 2011;87(1030):524–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Boyle E, O’Keeffe DA, Naughton PA, Hill AD, McDonnell CO, Moneley D. The importance of expert feedback during endovascular simulator training. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(1):240-8.e1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Grantcharov TP, Schulze S, Kristiansen VB. The impact of objective assessment and constructive feedback on improvement of laparoscopic performance in the operating room. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(12):2240–3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen JX, Miller LE, Filimonov A, Shuman EA, Marchiano E, George BC, et al. Factors affecting operative autonomy and performance during otolaryngology training: a multicenter trial. Laryngosc Investig Otolaryngol. 2022;7(2):404–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Blohm M, Sandblom G, Enochsson L, Cengiz Y, Austrums E, Abdon E, et al. Learning by doing: an observational study of the learning curve for ultrasonic fundus-first dissection in elective cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(6):4602–13.

Article  Google Scholar 

Maruthappu M, Gilbert BJ, El-Harasis MA, Nagendran M, McCulloch P, Duclos A, et al. The influence of volume and experience on individual surgical performance: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):642–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Abbott KL, Krumm AE, Kelley J, Kendrick DE, Clark M, Chen X, et al. Surgical trainee performance and alignment with surgical program director expectations. Ann Surg. 2021;276:e1095.

Article  Google Scholar 

Abbott KL, Kwakye G, Kim GJ, Luckoski JL, Krumm AE, Clark M, et al. US general surgical trainee performance for representative global surgery procedures. Am J Surg. 2022;223(2):224–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kunac A, Oliver JB, McFarlane JL, Anjaria DJ. General surgical resident operative autonomy vs patient outcomes: are we compromising training without net benefit to hospitals or patients? J Surg Educ. 2021;78(6):e174–82.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, Hedman L, Hogman C, McClusky DA 3rd, et al. Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg. 2007;193(6):797–804.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2004;240(3):518–25.

Article  Google Scholar 

Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ, et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(3):272–83.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Wehbe-Janek H, Colbert CY, Govednik-Horny C, White BA, Thomas S, Shabahang M. Residents’ perspectives of the value of a simulation curriculum in a general surgery residency program: a multimethod study of stakeholder feedback. Surgery. 2012;151(6):815–21.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kemp Bohan PM, Connelly CR, Crawford J, Bronson NW, Schreiber MA, Lucius CW, et al. Early analysis of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulation. Am J Surg. 2017;213(5):888–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Santos BF, Rooney DM, Patel P, Nagle AP, et al. A simulator-based resident curriculum for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surgery. 2014;156(4):880–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lv Y, Sun H, Qian Z, Mao W, Yao W, Ding C, et al. The effect of a simple simulator on the application of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in a low volume center. Minerva Chir. 2020;75(4):260–5.

Google Scholar