Iannotti J.P. Spencer E.E. Winter U. et al.

Prosthetic positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 14: 111S-121SSingh J.A. Sperling J. Buchbinder R. et al.

Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis: a Cochrane systematic review.

J Rheumatol. 38: 598-605Frankle M. Siegal S. Pupello D. et al.

The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87: 1697-1705

Survivorship of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 30: 457-465Chelli M. Boileau P. Domos P. et al.

Survivorship of reverse shoulder arthroplasty according to indication, age and gender.

J Clin Med. 11: 2677Bohsali K.I. Bois A.J. Wirth M.A.

Complications of Shoulder Arthroplasty.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 99 (): 256-269

Complications and revision of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 102: S33-S43Fox T.J. Foruria A.M. Klika B.J. et al.

Radiographic survival in total shoulder arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 22: 1221-1227

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, knee & shoulder arthroplasty annual report, AOA, Adelaide, Available at: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2020. Accessed August 2, 2022.

Farron A. Terrier A. Büchler P.

Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 15: 521-526Shapiro T.A. McGarry M.H. Gupta R. et al.

Biomechanical effects of glenoid retroversion in total shoulder arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 16: S90-S95Ho J.C. Sabesan V.J. Iannotti J.P.

Glenoid component retroversion is associated with osteolysis.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 95: e82Chebli C. Huber P. Watling J. et al.

Factors affecting fixation of the glenoid component of a reverse total shoulder prothesis.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 17: 323-327Nyffeler R.W. Werner C.M. Gerber C.

Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 14: 524-528Karelse A. Kegels L. De Wilde L.

The pillars of the scapula.

Clin Anat. 20: 392-399

Primary shoulder reverse arthroplasty: surgical technique.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 100: S181-S190Gutiérrez S. Walker M. Willis M. et al.

Effects of tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on baseplate/bone interface forces in a computational model, validated by a mechanical model, of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 20: 732-739Bitzer A. Rojas J. Patten I.S. et al.

Incidence and risk factors for aseptic baseplate loosening of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 27: 2145-2152Hart N.D. Clark J.C. Wade Krause F.R. et al.

Glenoid screw position in the Encore reverse shoulder prosthesis: an anatomic dissection study of screw relationship to surrounding structures.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 22: 814-820Leschinger T. Hackl M. Buess E. et al.

The risk of suprascapular and axillary nerve injury in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an anatomic study.

Injury. 48: 2042-2049Molony D.C. Cassar Gheiti A.J. Kennedy J. et al.

A cadaveric model for suprascapular nerve injury during glenoid component screw insertion in reverse-geometry shoulder arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 20: 1323-1327Crosby L.A. Hamilton A. Twiss T.

Scapula fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: classification and treatment.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469: 2544-2549Otto R.J. Virani N.A. Levy J.C. et al.

Scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation of risk factors and the reliability of a proposed classification.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 22: 1514-1521

The effect of screw position on the initial fixation of a reverse total shoulder prosthesis in a glenoid with a cavitary bone defect.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 17: 479-486Roche C. DiGeorgio C. Yegres J. et al.

Impact of screw length and screw quantity on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty glenoid fixation for 2 different sizes of glenoid baseplates.

JSES Open Access. 3: 296-303James J. Allison M.A. Werner F.W. et al.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty glenoid fixation: is there a benefit in using four instead of two screws?.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 22: 1030-1036Jain N. Pietrobon R. Hocker S. et al.

The relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86: 496-505Singh A. Yian E.H. Dillon M.T. et al.

The effect of surgeon and hospital volume on shoulder arthroplasty perioperative quality metrics.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 23: 1187-1194Papadonikolakis A. Neradilek M.B. Matsen 3rd, F.A.

Failure of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the English-language literature between 2006 and 2012.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 95: 2205-2212Iannotti J.P. Greeson C. Downing D. et al.

Effect of glenoid deformity on glenoid component placement in primary shoulder arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 21: 48-55

Preoperative planning in primary total knee arthroplasty.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 24: 220-230https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00332Della Valle A.G. Padgett D.E. Salvati E.A.

Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 13: 455-462Atesok K. Galos D. Jazrawi L.M. et al.

Preoperative planning in orthopaedic surgery. current practice and evolving applications.

Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 73: 257-268Lowe J.T. Testa E.J. Li X. et al.

Magnetic resonance imaging is comparable to computed tomography for determination of glenoid version but does not accurately distinguish between Walch B2 and C classifications.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 26: 669-673Scalise J.J. Codsi M.J. Bryan J. et al.

The three-dimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 17: 487-491Friedman R.J. Hawthorne K.B. Genez B.M.

The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 74: 1032-1037Maurer A. Fucentese S.F. Pfirrmann C.W. et al.

Assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 21: 1096-1103Scalise J.J. Codsi M.J. Bryan J. et al.

The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography images of the shoulder in preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90: 2438-2445Bryce C.D. Davison A.C. Lewis G.S. et al.

Two-dimensional glenoid version measurements vary with coronal and sagittal scapular rotation.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 92: 692-699Kwon Y.W. Powell K.A. Yum J.K. et al.

Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 14: 85-90Bokor D.J. O'Sullivan M.D. Hazan G.J.

Variability of measurement of glenoid version on computed tomography scan.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 8: 595-598Denard P.J. Provencher M.T. Lädermann A. et al.

Version and inclination obtained with 3-dimensional planning in total shoulder arthroplasty: do different programs produce the same results?.

JSES Open Access. 2: 200-204Erickson B.J. Chalmers P.N. Denard P. et al.

Does commercially available shoulder arthroplasty preoperative planning software agree with surgeon measurements of version, inclination, and subluxation?.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 30: 413-420Nowak D.D. Bahu M.J. Gardner T.R. et al.

Simulation of surgical glenoid resurfacing using three-dimensional computed tomography of the arthritic glenohumeral joint: the amount of glenoid retroversion that can be corrected.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 18: 680-688Clavert P. Millett P.J. Warner J.J.

Glenoid resurfacing: what are the limits to asymmetric reaming for posterior erosion?.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 16: 843-848Sabesan V. Callanan M. Ho J. et al.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty with bone graft for osteoarthritis with severe glenoid bone loss.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 95: 1290-1296Knowles N.K. Ferreira L.M. Athwal G.S.

Augmented glenoid component designs for type B2 erosions: a computational comparison by volume of bone removal and quality of remaining bone.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 24: 1218-1226Rosenthal Y. Rettig S.A. Virk M.S. et al.

Impact of preoperative 3-dimensional planning and intraoperative navigation of shoulder arthroplasty on implant selection and operative time: a single surgeon's experience.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 29: 2564-2570Jacquot A. Gauci M.O. Chaoui J. et al.

Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Int Orthop. 42: 2897-2906Throckmorton T.W. Gulotta L.V. Bonnarens F.O. et al.

Patient-specific targeting guides compared with traditional instrumentation for glenoid component placement in shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-surgeon study in 70 arthritic cadaver specimens.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 24: 965-971Berhouet J. Gulotta L.V. Dines D.M. et al.

Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 103: 407-413Berhouet J. Jacquot A. Walch G. et al.

Preoperative planning of baseplate position in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: still no consensus on lateralization, version and inclination.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 108: 103115Lee C.S. Davis S.M. Lane C.J. et al.

Reliability and accuracy of digital templating for the humeral component of total shoulder arthroplasty.

Shoulder Elbow. 7: 29-35Freehill M.T. Weick J.W. Ponce B.A. et al.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: component size prediction with 3-dimensional pre-operative digital planning.

J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 6 ()Poltaretskyi S. Chaoui J. Mayya M. et al.

Prediction of the pre-morbid 3D anatomy of the proximal humerus based on statistical shape modelling.

Bone Joint J. 99-B: 927-933Giannotti S. Sacchetti F. Citarelli C. et al.

Single-use, patient-specific instrumentation technology in knee arthroplasty: a comparative study between standard instrumentation and PSI efficiency system.

Musculoskelet Surg. 104: 195-200

Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty.

EFORT Open Rev. 1: 177-182Yam M.G.J. Chao J.Y.Y. Leong C. et al.

3D printed patient specific customised surgical jig for reverse shoulder arthroplasty, a cost effective and accurate solution.

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 21: 101503Hendel M.D. Bryan J.A. Barsoum W.K. et al.

Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 94: 2167-2175Iannotti J.P. Weiner S. Rodriguez E. et al.

Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 97: 651-658Cabarcas B.C. Cvetanovich G.L. Gowd A.K. et al.

Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

JSES Open Access. 3: 117-129Villatte G. Muller A.S. Pereira B. et al.

Use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for glenoid component positioning in shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 13: e0201759Darwood A. Hurst S.A. Villatte G. et al.

Novel robotic technology for the rapid intraoperative manufacture of patient-specific instrumentation allowing for improved glenoid component accuracy in shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 31: 561-570Walch G. Vezeridis P.S. Boileau P. et al.

Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 24: 302-309Moineau G. Levigne C. Boileau P. et al.French Society for Shoulder & Elbow (SOFEC)

Three-dimensional measurement method of arthritic glenoid cavity morphology: feasibility and reproducibility.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 98: S139-S145Gregory T.M. Sankey A. Augereau B. et al.

Accuracy of glenoid component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty and its effect on clinical and radiological outcome in a retrospective, longitudinal, monocentric open study.

PLoS One. 8: e75791Davis E.T. Gallie P. Macgroarty K. et al.

The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a cadaver study.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89: 557-560Lützner J. Krummenauer F. Wolf C. et al.

Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 90: 1039-1044Stindel E. Merloz P. Graf P. et al.

'expérience de la navigation chirurgicale dans l'ouest [computer assisted orthopedics surgery].

Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 93: 2S11-2S32

Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 428: 131-139Lung T.S. Cruickshank D. Grant H.J. et al.

Factors contributing to glenoid baseplate micromotion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 28: 648-653Jahic D. Suero E.M. Marjanovic B.

The use of computer navigation and patient specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty: everyday practice, just for special cases or actually teaching a surgeon?.

Acta Inform Med. 29: 130-133Verborgt O. Vanhees M. Heylen S. et al.

Computer navigation and patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty.

Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 22: e42-e49Edwards T.B. Gartsman G.M. O'Connor D.P. et al.

Safety and utility of computer-aided shoulder arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 17: 503-508Nguyen D. Ferreira L.M. Brownhill J.R. et al.

Improved accuracy of computer assisted glenoid implantation in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in-vitro randomized controlled trial.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 18: 907-914Aminov O. Regan W. Giles J.W. et al.

Targeting repeatability of a less obtrusive surgical navigation procedure for total shoulder arthroplasty.

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 17: 283-293Colasanti G.B. Moreschini F. Cataldi C. et al.

GPS guided reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Acta Biomed. 91: 204-208Verborgt O. De Smedt T. Vanhees M. et al.

Accuracy of placement of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty with and without navigation.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 20: 21-26Kircher J. Wiedemann M. Magosch P. et al.

Improved accuracy of glenoid positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty with intraoperative navigation: a prospective-randomized clinical study.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 18: 515-520Wang A.W. Hayes A. Gibbons R. et al.

Computer navigation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical trial to evaluate the learning curve.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 29: 617-623Schoch B.S. Haupt E. Leonor T. et al.

Computer navigation leads to more accurate glenoid targeting during total shoulder arthroplasty compared with 3-dimensional preoperative planning alone.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 29: 2257-2263Sadoghi P. Vavken J. Leithner A. et al.

Benefit of intraoperative navigation on glenoid component positioning during total shoulder arthroplasty.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 135: 41-47Burns D.M. Frank T. Whyne C.M. et al.

Glenoid component positioning and guidance techniques in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shoulder Elbow. 11: 16-28Moreschini F. Colasanti G.B. Cataldi C. et al.

Pre-operative CT-based planning integrated with intra-operative navigation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: data acquisition and analysis protocol, and preliminary results of navigated versus conventional surgery.

Dose Response. 18 ()Hones K.M. King J.J. Schoch B.S. et al.

The in vivo impact of computer navigation on screw number and length in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 30: e629-e635Sprowls G.R. Wilson C.D. Stewart W. et al.

Intraoperative navigation and preoperative templating software are associated with increased glenoid baseplate screw length and use of augmented baseplates in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

JSES Int. 5: 102-108Suter T. Kolz C.W. Tashjian R.Z. et al.

Humeral head osteotomy in shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison between anterosuperior and inferoanterior resection techniques.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 26: 343-351Geervliet P.C. Willems J.H. Sierevelt I.N. et al.

Overstuffing in resurfacing hemiarthroplasty is a potential risk for failure.

J Orthop Surg Res. 14: 474Cavanagh J. Lockhart J. Langohr G.D.G. et al.

A comparison of patient-specific instrumentation to navigation for conducting humeral head osteotomies during shoulder arthroplasty.

JSES Int. 5: 875-880Jud L. Fotouhi J. Andronic O. et al.

Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery - a systematic review.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 21: 103Berhouet J. Slimane M. Facomprez M. et al.

Views on a new surgical assistance method for implanting the glenoid component during total shoulder arthroplasty. Part 2: From three-dimensional reconstruction to augmented reality: feasibility study.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 105: 211-218Kriechling P. Loucas R. Loucas M. et al.

Augmented reality through head-mounted display for navigation of baseplate component placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. ()https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04025-5Kriechling P. Roner S. Liebmann F. et al.

Augmented reality for base plate component placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a feasibility study.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 141: 1447-1453Schlueter-Brust K. Henckel J. Katinakis F. et al.

Augmented-reality-assisted K-wire placement for glenoid component positioning in reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a proof-of-concept study.

J Pers Med. 11: 777Gregory T.M. Gregory J. Sledge J. et al.

Surgery guided by mixed reality: presentation of a proof of concept.

Acta Orthop. 89: 480-483Rojas J.T. Lädermann A. Ho S.W.L. et al.

Glenoid component placement assisted by augmented reality through a head-mounted display during reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Arthrosc Tech. 11: e863-e874Ponce et al teaching in SA Ponce B.A. Menendez M.E. et al.

Emerging technology in surgical education: combining real-time augmented reality and wearable computing devices.

Orthopedics. 37: 751-757