Efficacy and safety of biologic, biosimilars and targeted synthetic DMARDs in moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective: To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of approved biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), biosimilars, and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX). Results: 53 eligible studies were identified and 44 studies were included in a network meta-analysis. Using Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA), tofacitinib (10 mg bid) with MTX [Relative risk (RR) 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.65 (2.98-7.27)] and tofacitinib (10 mg bid) [RR (95%CI)1.96 (1.27-3.03)] were ranked highest among tsDMARDs for increasing remission rate at 24-26 weeks and 48-52 weeks, respectively. For bDMARDs, tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) with MTX was ranked with highest treatment effect for remission at both 24-26 and 48-52 weeks [RR (95%CI) 3.06 (2.27-4.12); RR (95%CI) 2.52 (1.94-3.28)]. For safety, baricitinib (4 mg) and tofacitinib (5 mg bid) with MTX likely showed an increased risk of HZ with statistical significance [for baricitinib, RR (95%CI) 3.52 (1.38-9.02) at 24-26 weeks, and RR (95%CI) 4.20 (1.22-14.48) at 48-52 weeks, and for tofacitinib, RR (95%CI) 5.38 (1.00-28.91) at 48-52 weeks]. No statistically significant safety concerns for serious infection, tuberculosis (TB), cancer, and cardiovascular (CV) events were identified. Conclusions: For RA patients who failed MTX, bDMARDs, biosimilars, and tsDMARDs monotherapy and combination therapy with MTX provided better treatment outcomes than MTX monotherapy with modest safety concerns within 24-52 weeks. A scarcity of longer-term effects and post-market surveillance necessitates further analyses using long-term patient-level data to improve the medication profile. Keywords: Antirheumatic Agents, Arthritis, Rheumatoid with inadequate responses to conventional synthetic DMARDs, serious adverse events, network meta-analysis

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Health System Research Institute (HSRI) grant number 63-048

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Main data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript. Additional data produced in the present work are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif