Wefel JS, Kesler SR, Noll KR, et al. Clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, and management of noncentral nervous system cancer-related cognitive impairment in adults. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):123–38.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bernstein LJ, McCreath GA, Komeylian Z, et al. Cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy depends on control group type and cognitive domains assessed: a multilevel meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;83:417–28.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dijkshoorn AB, van Stralen HE, Sloots, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment and change in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Psychooncology. 2021;30(5):635–48.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ahles TA, Root JC, Ryan EL. Cancer-and cancer treatment–associated cognitive change: an update on the state of the science. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(30):3675.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Henneghan A. Modifiable factors and cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-method systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(1):481–97.

Article  Google Scholar 

Borsboom D, Rhemtulla M, Cramer AO, et al. Kinds versus continua: a review of psychometric approaches to uncover the structure of psychiatric constructs. Psychol Med. 2016;46(8):1567–79.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(14):8418–23.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Northcott PA, Korshunov A, Witt H, et al. Medulloblastoma comprises four distinct molecular variants. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(11):1408.

Article  Google Scholar 

Karlson CW, Sarver DE, Raiker JS, et al. The contribution of neurocognitive functions to academic and psychological outcomes in pediatric cancer: a latent profile analysis. Child Neuropsychol. 2020;26(7):881–99.

Article  Google Scholar 

Partanen M, Phipps S, Russell K, et al. Longitudinal trajectories of neurocognitive functioning in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr Psychol. 2021;46(2):168–78.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sharkey CM, Mullins LL, Clawson AH, et al. Assessing neuropsychological phenotypes of pediatric brain tumor survivors. Psychooncology. 2021;30(8):1366–74.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bender CM, Merriman JD, Sereika SM, et al. Trajectories of cognitive function and associated phenotypic and genotypic factors in breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018;45(3):308–26.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wefel JS, Vardy J, Ahles T, et al. International cognition and cancer task force recommendations to harmonise studies of cognitive function in patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(7):703–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Feenstra HE, Vermeulen IE, Murre JM, et al. Online self-administered cognitive testing using the Amsterdam cognition scan: establishing psychometric properties and normative data. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(5):e9298.

Article  Google Scholar 

Feenstra HE, Murre JM, Vermeulen IE, et al. Reliability and validity of a self-administered tool for online neuropsychological testing: The Amsterdam Cognition Scan. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018;40(3):253–73.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stasinopoulos DM, Rigby RA. Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. J Stat Softw. 2008;23:1–46.

Google Scholar 

Raftery AE. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol Methodol. 1995;25:111–63.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tibshirani R, Walther G, Hastie T. Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2001;63(2):411–23.

Article  Google Scholar 

Witlox L, Schagen SB, De Ruiter MB, et al. Effect of physical exercise on cognitive function and brain measures after chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer (PAM study): protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e028117.

Article  Google Scholar 

Klaver KM, Duijts SF, Geusgens CA, et al. Internet-based cognitive rehabilitation for WORking Cancer survivors (i-WORC): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):1–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gehring K, Sitskoorn MM, Gundy CM, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation in patients with gliomas: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(22):3712–22.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hubert L, Arabie P. Comparing partitions. J Classif. 1985;2(1):193–218.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nagin DS. Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(2):139.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rousseeuw PJ. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math. 1987;20:53–65.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rubin DB. Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician. Ann Stat. 1984;12(4):1151–72.

Article  Google Scholar 

Scrucca L, Fop M, Murphy TB, et al. mclust 5: clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. R J. 2016;8(1):289.

Article  Google Scholar 

Charrad M, Ghazzali N, Boiteau V, et al. NbClust: an R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. J Stat Softw. 2014;61:1–36.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vermunt, JK, Magidson, J. Latent class cluster analysis. In: Hagenaars JA, McCutcheon AL, editors. Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2002. pp. 89–106.

Lletí R, Ortiz MC, Sarabia LA, et al. Selecting variables for k-means cluster analysis by using a genetic algorithm that optimises the silhouettes. Anal Chim Acta. 2004;515(1):87–100.

Article  Google Scholar 

Keysers C, Gazzola V, Wagenmakers EJ. Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23(7):788–99.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Demeyere N, Riddoch MJ, Slavkova ED, et al. Domain-specific versus generalized cognitive screening in acute stroke. J Neurol. 2016;263(2):306–15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sherrill-Pattison S, Donders J, Thompson E. Influence of demographic variables on neuropsychological test performance after traumatic brain injury. Clin Neuropsychol. 2000;14(4):496–503.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Gale SD, Baxter L, Connor DJ, et al. Sex differences on the Rey auditory verbal learning test and the brief visuospatial memory test–revised in the elderly: Normative data in 172 participants. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007;29(5):561–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tein JY, Coxe S, Cham H. Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Struct Equ Modeling. 2013;20(4):640–57.

Article  Google Scholar 

Luijendijk, MJ, Feenstra, HE, Vermeulen, IE, et al. Binary classification threatens the validity of cognitive impairment detection. Neuropsychology. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000831.

Jim HS, Phillips KM, Chait S, et al. Meta-analysis of cognitive functioning in breast cancer survivors previously treated with standard-dose chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(29):3578.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Agelink van Rentergem JA, Vermeulen IE, Lee MeeuwKjoe PR, et al. Computational modeling of neuropsychological test performance to disentangle impaired cognitive processes in cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113(1):99–102.

Article  Google Scholar