Ahmad T, Sattar K, Akram A. Medical professionalism videos on YouTube: content exploration and appraisal of user engagement. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.06.007

Selvi I, Baydilli N. An analysis of misleading YouTube videos on urological conditions: what to do about the danger of spreading misinformation of the YouTube videos? World J Urol. 2022 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03623-7

Krieger JN, Nyberg L Jr, Nickel JC. NIH consensus definition and classification of prostatitis. JAMA. 1999; https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.3.236

Krieger JN, Lee SW, Jeon J, Cheah PY, Liong ML, Riley DE. Epidemiology of prostatitis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.08.028

Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x

Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis-a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012; https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.111114

Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997; https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039

Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999; https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.2.105

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

Loeb S, Taylor J, Borin JF, Mihalcea R, Perez-Rosas V, Byrne N, et al. Fake news: spread of misinformation about urological conditions on social media. Eur Urol Focus. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.011

Nickel JC. Classification and diagnosis of prostatitis: a gold standard? Andrologia. 2003; https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0272.2003.00557.x

McNaughton Collins M, Pontari MA, O’Leary MP, Calhoun EA, Santanna J, Landis JR, et al. Quality of life is impaired in men with chronic prostatitis: the Chronic Prostatitis Collaborative Research Network. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.050

Zhao FL, Yue M, Yang H, Wang T, Wu JH, Li SC. Health-related quality of life in Chinese patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Qual Life Res. 2010; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9697-2

Mändar R, Korrovits P, Rahu K, Rahu M, Sibul EL, Mehik A, et al. Dramatically deteriorated quality of life in men with prostatitis-like symptoms. Andrology. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12647

Melchionna A, Collà Ruvolo C, Capece M, La Rocca R, Celentano G, Califano G, et al. Testicular pain and youtube™: are uploaded videos a reliable source to get information? Int J Impot Res. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00536-w

Toksoz A, Duran MB. Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube. J Pediatr Urol. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006

Franco JV, Turk T, Jung JH, Xiao YT, Iakhno S, Garrote V, et al. Non-pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012551.pub3

Keten T, Erkan A. An investigation of the reliability of YouTube videos on undescended testis. J Pediatr Urol. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.04.021

Duran MB, Kizilkan Y. Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube. Andrologia. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1111/and.14118

Ku S, Balasubramanian A, Yu J, Srivatsav A, Gondokusumo J, Tatem AJ, et al. A systematic evaluation of youtube as an information source for male infertility. Int J Impot Res. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0322-9

Babar M, Loloi J, Patel RD, Singh S, Azhar U, Maria P, et al. Cross-sectional and comparative analysis of videos on erectile dysfunction treatment on YouTube and TikTok. Andrologia. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1111/and.14392

Capece M, Di Giovanni A, Cirigliano L, Napolitano L, La Rocca R, Creta M, et al. YouTube as a source of information on penile prosthesis. Andrologia. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1111/and.14246

Cilio S, Collà Ruvolo C, Turco C, Creta M, Capece M, La Rocca R, et al. Analysis of quality information provided by “Dr. YouTubeTM” on Phimosis. Int J Impot Res. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00557-5

Fode M, Nolsøe AB, Jacobsen FM, Russo GI, Østergren PB, Jensen CFS, et al. EAU YAU Men’s Health Working Group. Quality of information in YouTube videos on erectile dysfunction. Sex Med. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2020.05.007

Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082469

Baydilli N, Selvi I. Is social media reliable as a source of information on Peyronie’s disease treatment? Int J Impot Res. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00454-3

Southern MG. YouTube CEO defends removal of dislike counts. Search Engine Journal News. 2022. https://www.searchenginejournal.com/youtube-ceo-defends-removal-of-dislike-counts/435092/#close. Accessed 27 Nov 2022.

Toprak T, Yilmaz M, Ramazanoglu MA, Verit A, Schlager D, Miernik A. YouTube is inadequate as an information source on delayed ejaculation. Int J Impot Res. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00559-3