Who’s afraid of the X? Incorporating the X and Y chromosomes into the analysis of DNA methylation array data

Mauvais-Jarvis F, Merz NB, Barnes PJ, Brinton RD, Carrero J-J, DeMeo DL, et al. Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. The Lancet. 2020;396:565–82.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ray PF, Conaghan J, Winston RML, Handyside AH. Increased number of cells and metabolic activity in male human preimplantation embryos following in vitro fertilization. Reproduction. 1995;104:165–71.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft WB, et al. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:520–4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hentemann MA, Briskemyr S, Bertheussen K. Blastocyst transfer and gender: IVF versus ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:433–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Luna M, Duke M, Copperman A, Grunfeld L, Sandler B, Barritt J. Blastocyst embryo transfer is associated with a sex-ratio imbalance in favor of male offspring. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:519–23.

Article  Google Scholar 

Inkster AM, Fernández-Boyano I, Robinson WP. Sex differences are here to stay: relevance to prenatal care. J Clin Med. 2021;10:3000.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Shapiro JR, Klein SL, Morgan R. Stop ‘controlling’ for sex and gender in global health research. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e005714.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pidsley R, Zotenko E, Peters TJ, Lawrence MG, Risbridger GP, Molloy P, et al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1066-1.

Article  Google Scholar 

McCarthy NS, Melton PE, Cadby G, Yazar S, Franchina M, Moses EK, et al. Meta-analysis of human methylation data for evidence of sex-specific autosomal patterns. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:981.

Article  Google Scholar 

Singmann P, Shem-Tov D, Wahl S, Grallert H, Fiorito G, Shin S-Y, et al. Characterization of whole-genome autosomal differences of DNA methylation between men and women. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-015-0035-3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yousefi P, Huen K, Aguilar Schall R, Decker A, Elboudwarej E, Quach H, et al. Considerations for normalization of DNA methylation data by Illumina 450K BeadChip assay in population studies. Epigenetics. 2013;8:1141–52.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Xu H, Wang F, Liu Y, Yu Y, Gelernter J, Zhang H. Sex-biased methylome and transcriptome in human prefrontal cortex. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:1260–70.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Hall E, Volkov P, Dayeh T, Esguerra JLS, Salö S, Eliasson L, et al. Sex differences in the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern and impact on gene expression, microRNA levels and insulin secretion in human pancreatic islets. Genome Biol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0522-z.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gatev E, Inkster AM, Negri GL, Konwar C, Lussier AA, Skakkebaek A, et al. Autosomal sex-associated co-methylated regions predict biological sex from DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:9097–116.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Shah PS, Sankaran K, Aziz K, Allen AC, Seshia M, Ohlsson A, et al. Outcomes of preterm infants <29 weeks gestation over 10-year period in Canada: a cause for concern? J Perinatol. 2012;32:132–8.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zaghlool SB, Al-Shafai M, Al Muftah WA, Kumar P, Falchi M, Suhre K. Association of DNA methylation with age, gender, and smoking in an Arab population. Clin Epigenetics. 2015;7:6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang M, Wang C-C, Yang C, Meng H, Agbagwa IO, Wang L-X, et al. Epigenetic pattern on the human Y chromosome is evolutionarily conserved. PLoS ONE. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146402.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lund JB, Li S, Christensen K, Mengel-From J, Soerensen M, Marioni RE, et al. Age-dependent DNA methylation patterns on the Y chromosome in elderly males. Aging Cell. 2020;19:e12907.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kananen L, Marttila S. Ageing-associated changes in DNA methylation in X and Y chromosomes. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2021;14:33.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Vidaki A, González DM, Jiménez BP, Kayser M. Male-specific age estimation based on Y-chromosomal DNA methylation. Aging. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.202775.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cotton AM, Avila L, Penaherrera MS, Affleck JG, Robinson WP, Brown CJ. Inactive X chromosome-specific reduction in placental DNA methylation. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:3544–52.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Cotton AM, Price EM, Jones MJ, Balaton BP, Kobor MS, Brown CJ. Landscape of DNA methylation on the X chromosome reflects CpG density, functional chromatin state and X-chromosome inactivation. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:1528–39.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Maden SK, Thompson RF, Hansen KD, Nellore A. Human methylome variation across Infinium 450K data on the gene expression Omnibus. NAR Genom Bioinform. 2021;3:lqab025.

Article  Google Scholar 

Touleimat N, Tost J. Complete pipeline for Infinium® Human Methylation 450K BeadChip data processing using subset quantile normalization for accurate DNA methylation estimation. Epigenomics. 2012;4:325–41.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bartolomei MS, Tilghman SM. Genomic imprinting in mammals. Annu Rev Genet. 1997;31:493–525.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Feil R, Khosla S. Genomic imprinting in mammals: an interplay between chromatin and DNA methylation? Trends Genet. 1999;15:431–5.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sharp AJ, Stathaki E, Migliavacca E, Brahmachary M, Montgomery SB, Dupre Y, et al. DNA methylation profiles of human active and inactive X chromosomes. Genome Res. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.112680.110.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tukiainen T, Villani A-C, Yen A, Rivas MA, Marshall JL, Satija R, et al. Landscape of X chromosome inactivation across human tissues. Nature. 2017;550:244–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rocks D, Shukla M, Ouldibbat L, Finnemann SC, Kalluchi A, Rowley MJ, et al. Sex-specific multi-level 3D genome dynamics in the mouse brain. Nat Commun. 2022;13:3438.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Robinson WP, Price EM. The human placental methylome. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a023044.

Article  Google Scholar 

Heiss JA, Just AC. Improved filtering of DNA methylation microarray data by detection p values and its impact on downstream analyses. Clin Epigenetics. 2019;11:15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pidsley R, Wong CCY, Volta M, Lunnon K, Mill J, Schalkwyk LC. A data-driven approach to preprocessing Illumina 450K methylation array data. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:293.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Planterose Jiménez B, Kayser M, Vidaki A. Revisiting genetic artifacts on DNA methylation microarrays exposes novel biological implications. Genome Biol. 2021;22:274.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nakabayashi K. Illumina humanmethylation beadchip for genome-wide DNA methylation profiling: advantages and limitations. In: Patel V, Preedy V, editors. Handbook of nutrition, diet, and epigenetics. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 1–15.

Google Scholar 

Edgar RD, Jones MJ, Robinson WP, Kobor MS. An empirically driven data reduction method on the human 450K methylation array to remove tissue specific non-variable CpGs. Clin Epigenetics. 2017;9:11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhou W, Laird PW, Shen H. Comprehensive characterization, annotation and innovative use of Infinium DNA methylation BeadChip probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:e22.

Google Scholar 

Price ME, Cotton AM, Lam LL, Farré P, Emberly E, Brown CJ, et al. Additional annotation enhances potential for biologically-relevant analysis of the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2013;6:4.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Chen Y, Lemire M, Choufani S, Butcher DT, Grafodatskaya D, Zanke BW, et al. Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics. 2013;8:203–9.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Karafet TM, Mendez FL, Meilerman MB, Underhill PA, Zegura SL, Hammer MF. New binary polymorphisms reshape and increase resolution of the human Y chromosomal haplogroup tree. Genome Res. 2008;18:830–8.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Olney KC, Brotman SM, Andrews JP, Valverde-Vesling VA, Wilson MA. Reference genome and transcriptome informed by the sex chromosome complement of the sample increase ability to detect sex differences in gene expression from RNA-Seq data. Biol Sex Differ. 2020;11(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-020-00312-9.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Veerappa AM, Padakannaya P, Ramachandra NB. Copy number variation-based polymorphism in a new pseudoautosomal region 3 (PAR3) of a human X-chromosome-transposed region (XTR) in the Y chromosome. Funct Integr Genomics. 2013;13:285–93.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Cotton AM, Lam L, Affleck JG, Wilson IM, Peñaherrera MS, McFadden DE, et al. Chromosome-wide DNA methylation analysis predicts human tissue-specific X inactivation. Hum Genet. 2011;130:187–201.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Fratta E, Coral S, Covre A, Parisi G, Colizzi F, Danielli R, et al. The biology of cancer testis antigens: putative function, regulation and therapeutic potential. Mol Oncol. 2011;5:164–82.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bailey JA, Carrel L, Chakravarti A, Eichler EE. Molecular evidence for a relationship between LINE-1 elements and X chromosome inactivation: the Lyon repeat hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97:6634–9.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Fujita PA, Rhead B, Zweig AS, Hinrichs AS, Karolchik D, Cline MS, et al. The UCSC genome browser database: update 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D876–82.

Article  CAS 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif