Evaluation of quality, readability, suitability, and usefulness of online resources available to cancer survivors

Government of Canada SC. The daily — Canadian Internet use survey. Published October 29, 2019. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/191029/dq191029a-eng.htm.

Martin M. Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2018. US Department of Commerce; 2021:14. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2021/acs/acs-49.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2022. 

Communications Report 2018–19. Australian communications and media authority; 176. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/Communications%20report%202018-19.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2022. 

Dr Google will see you now: search giant wants to cash in on your medical queries. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/03/10/google-sifting-one-billion-health-questions-day/.

Cancer Treatment & Survivorship. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/cancer-treatment-and-survivorship-facts-and-figures/cancer-treatment-and-survivorship-facts-and-figures-2019-2021.pdf.

Lee S. Cancer statistics at a glance. Canadian Cancer Society. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://cancer.ca/en/research/cancer-statistics/cancer-statistics-at-a-glance.

Cancer Statistics - NCI. Published February 4, 2015. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics.

Fareed N, Swoboda CM, Jonnalagadda P, Huerta TR. Persistent digital divide in health-related internet use among cancer survivors: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2003–2018. J Cancer Surviv. 2021;15(1):87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00913-8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Finney Rutten LJ, Agunwamba AA, Wilson P, et al. Cancer-related information seeking among cancer survivors: trends over a decade (2003–2013). J Cancer Educ Off J Am Assoc Cancer Educ. 2016;31(2):348–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0802-7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jiang S, Liu PL. Digital divide and Internet health information seeking among cancer survivors: a trend analysis from 2011 to 2017. Psychooncology. 2020;29(1):61–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5247.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mayer DK, Terrin NC, Kreps GL, et al. Cancer survivors information seeking behaviors. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(3):342–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.015.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shea-Budgell MA, Kostaras X, Myhill KP, Hagen NA. Information needs and sources of information for patients during cancer follow-up. Curr Oncol. 2014;21(4):165–73. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1932.

Article  Google Scholar 

Holmes MM. Why people living with and beyond cancer use the Internet. Integr Cancer Ther. 2019;18:1534735419829830. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735419829830.

Article  Google Scholar 

Supported self-management: a simple, effective way to improve depression care - Dan Bilsker, Elliot M Goldner, Ellen Anderson, 2012. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/070674371205700402.

Foster C, Fenlon D. Recovery and self-management support following primary cancer treatment. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(Suppl 1):S21–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.419.

Article  Google Scholar 

Coulter A, Ellins J. Patient-focused interventions: a review of the evidence. Picker Institute Europe, The Health Foundation: London; 2006.

Ofman JJ, Badamgarav E, Henning JM, et al. Does disease management improve clinical and economic outcomes in patients with chronic diseases? A systematic review. Am J Med. 2004;117(3):182–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.018.

Article  Google Scholar 

Daraz L, Morrow AS, Ponce OJ, et al. Can patients trust online health information? A meta-narrative systematic review addressing the quality of health information on the Internet. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(9):1884–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05109-0.

Article  Google Scholar 

Monton O, Lambert S, Belzile E, Mohr-Elzeki D. An evaluation of the suitability, readability, quality, and usefulness of online resources for family caregivers of patients with cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(10):1892–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.010.

Article  Google Scholar 

Boureanu M, Brahim LO, Apedaile D, et al. Evaluation of online, publicly available cancer-related educational and self-management resources for symptom management. Psychooncology. 2021;30(11):1884–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5756.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rathod P, Ould Brahim L, Belzile E, Lambert S. An evaluation of the suitability, readability, and quality of online resources for the self-management of depression. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(5):952–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.021.

Article  Google Scholar 

Abdullah Y, Alokozai A, O’Connell S, Mulcahey MK. Online patient education materials for common sports injuries are written at too-high of a reading level: a systematic review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022;4(3):e861–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.12.017.

Article  Google Scholar 

Skierkowski DD, Florin P, Harlow LL, Machan J, Ye Y. A readability analysis of online mental health resources. Am Psychol. 2019;74(4):474–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000324.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nnamani Silva ON, Ammanuel SG, Segobiano BM, Edwards CS, Hoffman WY. Assessing the readability of online patient education resources related to gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;87(2):123–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002620.

Article  Google Scholar 

Eltorai AEM, Ghanian S, Adams CA, Born CT, Daniels AH. Readability of patient education materials on the american association for surgery of trauma Website. Arch Trauma Res. 2014;3(2):e18161. https://doi.org/10.5812/atr.18161.

Article  Google Scholar 

Health literacy. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/health-literacy.

Daraz L, Morrow AS, Ponce OJ, et al. Readability of online health information: a meta-narrative systematic review. Am J Med Qual Off J Am Coll Med Qual. 2018;33(5):487–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860617751639.

Article  Google Scholar 

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews | The BMJ. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71.

Hôpital Général Juif | Patient Education Resources. Hôpital Général Juif. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.jgh.ca/care-services/health-sciences-library/patient-education-resources/.

Search engine market share worldwide. StatCounter Global Stats. Accessed September 1, 2022. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share.

95 percent of web traffic goes to sites on Page 1 of Google SERPs [study]. Brafton. Published June 21, 2013. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.brafton.com/news/95-percent-of-web-traffic-goes-to-sites-on-page-1-of-google-serps-study/.

Chapman L, Brooks C, Lawson J, Russell C, Adams J. Accessibility of online self-management support websites for people with osteoarthritis: a text content analysis. Chronic Illn. 2019;15(1):27–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395317746471.

Article  Google Scholar 

Heady SC, Weaver MA, Berg GM, Manlove EM, Thuener JE, Burton DC. Evaluation of online consumer health information for idiopathic scoliosis identified by a GoogleTM search. Kans J Med. 2018;11(4):95–101.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lovett J, Gordon C, Patton S, Chen CX. Online information on dysmenorrhoea: an evaluation of readability, credibility, quality and usability. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(19–20):3590–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14954.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kaspar K, Weber SL, Wilbers AK. Personally relevant online advertisements: effects of demographic targeting on visual attention and brand evaluation. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212419.

Article  Google Scholar 

Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.2.105.

Article  Google Scholar 

Charnock D. The DISCERN Handbook: Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information on Treatment Choices. Radcliffe Medical; 1998. https://a-f-r.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/01/1998-Radcliffe-Medical-Press-Quality-criteria-for-consumer-health-information-on-treatment-choices.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2021.

Charow R, Snow M, Fathima S, et al. Evaluation of the scope, quality, and health literacy demand of Internet-based anal cancer information. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019;107(4):527–37. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.393.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tests Document Readability. Accessed November 22, 2022. https://www.online-utility.org/english/readability_test_and_improve.jsp.

Klingbeil C, Speece MW, Schubiner H. Readability of pediatric patient education materials: current perspectives on an old problem. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1995;34(2):96–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/000992289503400206.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ley P, Florio T. The use of readability formulas in health care. Psychol Health Med. Published online October 24, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548509608400003.

Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills. Lippincott; 1985. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/healthliteracy/resources/teaching-patients-with-low-literacy-skills/. Accessed 31 Aug 2022.

Lisy K, Langdon L, Piper A, Jefford M. Identifying the most prevalent unmet needs of cancer survivors in Australia: a systematic review. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019;15(5):e68–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13176.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shakeel S, Tung J, Rahal R, Finley C. Evaluation of factors associated with unmet needs in adult cancer survivors in Canada. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e200506–e200506. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0506.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fitch MI, Nicoll I, Lockwood G. Cancer survivor’s perspectives on the major challenge in the transition to survivorship. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(11):2361–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.018.

Article  Google Scholar 

Houle J, Gascon-Depatie M, Bélanger-Dumontier G, Cardinal C. Depression self-management support: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91(3):271–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.012.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lorig KR, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med Publ Soc Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01.

Article  Google Scholar 

Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57(4):660–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00341.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Patients’ perspective on self‐management in the recovery from depression - Grieken - 2015 - Health Expectations - Wiley Online Library. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy3.library.mcgill.ca/doi/full/10.1111/hex.12112.

van Grieken RA, Kirkenier AC, Koeter MW, Schene AH. Helpful self-management strategies to cope with enduring depression from the patients’ point of view: a concept map study. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14(1):331. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0331-7.

Article  Google Scholar 

JMIR aging - a tool that assesses the evidence, transparency, and usability of online health information: development and reliability assessment. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://aging.jmir.org/2018/1/e3/.

Rousseeuw PJ. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math. 1987;20:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ. Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. John Wiley & Sons; 2009. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470316801. Accessed 31 Aug 2022. 

Adults with inadequate literacy skills - education provincial rankings - how Canada performs. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/provincial/education/adlt-lowlit.aspx.

Kim S. Literacy skills gaps: a cross-level analysis on international and intergenerational variations. Int Rev Educ. 2018;64(1):85–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-018-9703-4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Literacy project foundation – believe – dream – soar. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://literacyproj.org/.

CDC. The what, why, and how of health literacy. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published July 27, 2022. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/Understanding.html.

Hickey KT, Creber RMM, Reading M, et al. Low health literacy. Nurse Pract. 2018;43(8):49–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPR.0000541468.54290.49.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sertkaya Z, Koyuncu E, Nakipoğlu Yüzer GF, Özgirgin N. Investigation of health literacy level and its effect on quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. Published online November 2, 2021:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2021.1991162.

Kanejima Y, Shimogai T, Kitamura M, Ishihara K, Izawa KP. Impact of health literacy in patients with cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(7):1793–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.021.

Article  Google Scholar 

King A. Poor health literacy: a “hidden” risk factor. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7(9):473–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.122.

Article  Google Scholar 

CDC. Visual communication resources for health-related materials. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published April 28, 2021. Accessed May 9, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/developmaterials/visual-communication.html.

Chan T. LibGuides: Citing sources: overview. Accessed May 9, 2022. https://libguides.mit.edu/c.php?g=176032&p=1159439.

Giving birth — Middlesex-London Health Unit. Accessed November 22, 2022. https://www.healthunit.com/giving-birth.

Weighing up benefits and harms: information for patients | BMJ Best Practice. Accessed November 22, 2022. https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/practise-ebm/weighing-up-risks-and-benefits/.

Zuidema WP, Graumans MJ, Oosterhuis JWA, van der Steeg AFW, van Heurn E. The Quality of Web sites’ health information on minimal invasive repair of pectus excavatum using the DISCERN instrument. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2021;31(02):157–63. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1710026.

Article  Google Scholar 

Allam A, Schulz PJ, Krauthammer M. Toward automated assessment of health Web page quality using the DISCERN instrument. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(3):481–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw140.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif