Preoperative hiatal hernia in esophageal adenocarcinoma; does it have an impact on patient outcomes?

Elsevier

Available online 7 January 2023, 101904

Surgical OncologyAuthor links open overlay panelHighlights•

A clinically significant HH is frequent among esophageal adenocarcinoma patients, observed in 32.7% of all AC patients, in the present series.

The presence of HH but it was not correlated with more advanced cancer stage upon diagnosis.

Although the presence of a HH may indicate a higher location of the tumor epicenter and thus influence the choice of surgical strategy, it is not associated with poorer surgical outcomes, histologic response to treatment or long-term survival.

AbstractBackground

The impact of hiatal hernia (HH) on oncologic outcomes of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of pre-existing HH (≥3 cm) on histologic response after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Methods

All consecutive patients with oncological esophagectomy for AC from 2012 to 2018 in our center were eligible for assessment. Categorical variables were compared with the X2 or Fisher's test, continuous ones with the Mann-Whitney-U test, and survival with the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test.

Results

Overall, 101 patients were included; 33 (32.7%) had a pre-existing HH. There were no baseline differences between HH and non-HH patients. NAT was used in 81.8% HH and 80.9% non-HH patients (p = 0.910), most often chemoradiation (63.6% and 57.4% respectively, p = 0.423). Good response to NAT (TRG 1–2) was observed in 36.4% of HH versus 32.4% of non-HH patients (p = 0.297), whereas R0 resection was achieved in 90.9% versus 94.1% respectively (p = 0.551). Three-year OS was comparable for the two groups (52.4% in HH, 56.5% in non-HH patients, p = 0.765), as was 3-year DFS (32.7% for HH versus 45.6% for non-HH patients, p = 0.283).

Conclusion

HH ≥ 3 cm are common in patients with esophageal AC, concerning 32.7% of all patients in this series. However, its presence was neither associated with more advanced disease upon diagnosis, worse response to NAT, nor overall and disease-free survival. Therefore, such HH should not be considered as risk factor that negatively affects oncological outcome after multimodal treatment of esophageal AC.

Keywords

Hiatal hernia

Esophageal adenocarcinoma

Esophagectomy

Oncology

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif