Association between Level of Parental Oral Health Literacy and the Rational Use of Fluoride for Children from 0 to 4 Years of Age after Instruction: An Intervention Trial

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply

Select

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Research Article

Received: May 12, 2022
Accepted: October 03, 2022
Published online: November 16, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0008-6568 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-976X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CRE

Abstract

An inadequate level of oral health literacy (OHL) can hinder the understanding of dental information, which can have a negative impact on health promotion actions, such as the rational use of fluoride. The aims of the present study were (1) to look for association between parents/guardians’ OHL and the amount of fluoride toothpaste used for children from zero to four years of age; (2) to compare the effect of different modes of educational interventions on the amount of fluoride toothpaste used for children from zero to four years of age; and (3) to assess the ability of parents/guardians to choose a toothpaste with adequate fluoride concentration, after the educational intervention. A randomized intervention study was conducted with parents/guardians of children from zero to four years of age (n = 145). The participants answered the Oral Health Literacy Adults Questionnaire and a questionnaire addressing sociodemographic characteristics. The participants were allocated to four intervention groups based on type of counseling (written, oral, written + photograph, and oral + photograph), with randomization stratified by level of OHL. The participants were instructed to place the adequate amount of toothpaste on a toothbrush for children from zero to four years of age (smear of 0.125 mg) before and after the intervention. The correct choice of toothpaste was also evaluated by the interpretation of the labels of four toothpastes of different brands and with different concentrations of fluoride. Associations between variables were tested using the Student’s t test and one-way ANOVA. Level of OHL was associated with the amount of fluoride toothpaste deposited prior to the educational intervention (p = 0.021) and the percentage of approximation to the appropriate amount of fluoride toothpaste (p < 0.05). The choice of toothpaste was associated with schooling (p = 0.031). In conclusion, parents/guardians with adequate OHL better quantified fluoride toothpaste before and after the educational intervention and also came closer to the appropriate amount of toothpaste after the educational intervention. No significant differences in the final amount of toothpaste placed on the toothbrush were found among the intervention groups. The choice of the correct toothpaste was associated with a higher level of schooling.

© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel

References _Journal>Pediatr Dent. 2016;38:181–4. _Journal>Caries Res. 2013;47(Suppl 1):2–12. _Journal>J Dent Res. 2016;95(1):35–42. _Journal>2018 IADR/PER General Session (London/England), 2018, Londres. J Dent Res. Alexandria, EUA. 2018;7B:0780. _Journal>Health Educ Res. 2016 feb;31(1):70–81. _Journal>Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(3):411–6. _Journal>Fluoride and oral enviromenment. Monogr Oral Sci. Basel: Karger; 2011. Vol. 22. p. I–XII. _Journal>Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr. 2020;20:e5300. _Journal>Braz Oral Res. 2014;28(spe):1–7. _Journal>Br Dent J. 2017;223(7):515–9. _Journal>Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9(1108):108–9. _Journal>Acta Odontol Scand. 2012;70(5):390–7. _Journal>J Am Dent Assoc. 2017;148(8):604–13. _Journal>Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28(5):459–71. _Journal>Community Dent Health. 2016;33(4):274–80. _Journal>Int Dent J. 2018:1–7. _Journal>Pediatr Dent. 2013;35(3):262–6. _Journal>The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Washington: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics publication 483; 2006. _Journal>Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr. 2020;20:e5498. _Journal>Am J Health Behav. 2019;43(3):556–68. _Journal>Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2019;24(7):2737–44. _Journal>Interact J Med Res. 2014;3(3):e13. _Journal>J Dent Biomater. 2017;4(2):394–402. _Journal>J Investig Clin Dent. 2014;5(4):313–21. _Journal>BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):80. _Journal>Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019;29(3):238–48. _Journal>Healthy People 2010: General Data Issues. 2010. p. 56. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hpdata2010/hp2010_general_data_issues.pdf. _Journal>Oral Health Prev Dent. 2017;15:41–48. _Journal>Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3(3):CD007868. years: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 feb;145(2):182–9. . PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0131600–11. 0 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Ann Int Med. 2010;152:1–12. Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Research Article

Received: May 12, 2022
Accepted: October 03, 2022
Published online: November 16, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0008-6568 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-976X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CRE

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif