Background: The affordability of dental care continues to receive attention in Canada. Since most dental care is privately financed, the use of dental care is largely influenced by insurance coverage and the ability to pay-out-of pocket. Objectives: 1) To explore trends in self-reported cost barriers to dental care in Ontario; 2) To determine the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of Ontarians reporting cost barriers to dental care; and 3) To identify what predicts reporting cost barriers to dental care in Ontario. Methods: A secondary data analysis of five cycles (2003, 2005, 2009-10, 2013-14 and 2017-18) of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) was undertaken. The CCHS is a cross-sectional survey that collects information related to health status, health care utilization, and health determinants for the Canadian population. Univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted to determine the characteristics of Ontarians who reported cost barriers to dental care. Poisson regression was used to calculate unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios to determine the predictors of reporting a cost barrier to dental care. Results: In 2014, 34% of Ontarians avoided visiting a dental professional in past three years due to cost, up from 22% in 2003. Having no insurance was the strongest predictor for reporting cost barriers to dental care, followed by being 20-39 years of age and having a lower income. Conclusion: Self-reported cost barriers to dental care have generally increased in Ontario but more so for those with no insurance, low income, and aged 20-39 years.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Not Applicable

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

N/A This study is a secondary data analysis of anonymous data that contained no personal identifiers, nor that was linked to any other data source. According to Article 2.4 of the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans-TCPS 2 (2018), “a Research Ethics Board review is not required for research that relies exclusively on the secondary use of anonymous information, or anonymous human biological materials, so long as the process of data linkage or recording or dissemination of results does not generate identifiable information.”

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Not Applicable

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Not Applicable

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.