“Won’t get fooled again”: statistical fault detection in COVID-19 Latin American data

WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 8]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int.

Coronavirus Update (Live) [Internet]. [cited 2020 May 20]. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries.

COVID-19 Map [Internet]. Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. [cited 2021 Mar 8]. Available from: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.

Yang K. What can COVID-19 tell us about evidence-based management? Am. Rev. Public Adm. 2020 Aug 1;50(6–7):706–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Farhadi N, Lahooti H. Forensic analysis of COVID-19 data from 198 countries two years after the pandemic outbreak. COVID. 2022 Mar 30;2(4):472–84.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Miller AR, Charepoo S, Yan E, Frost RW, Sturgeon ZJ, Gibbon G, et al. Reliability of COVID-19 data: an evaluation and reflection. PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0251470.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Koch C, Okamura K. Benford’s law and COVID-19 reporting. Econ. Lett. 2020 Nov;196:109573.

Article  Google Scholar 

Taylor L. ‘We are being ignored’: Brazil’s researchers blame anti-science government for devastating COVID surge. Nature. 2021 Apr 27;593(7857):15–6.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Silva L, Figueiredo FD. Using Benford’s law to assess the quality of COVID-19 register data in Brazil. J. Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;43(1):107–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Balashov VS, Yan Y, Zhu X. Using the Newcomb–Benford law to study the association between a country’s COVID-19 reporting accuracy and its development. Sci. Rep. 2021 Dec;11(1):22914.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kilani A, Georgiou GP. Countries with potential data misreport based on Benford’s law. J. Public Health. 2021 Jan. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab001.

Kolias P. Applying Benford’s law to COVID-19 data: the case of the European Union. J. Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;44(2):e221–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nigrini MJ. Benford’s Law: Applications for Forensic Accounting, Auditing, and Fraud Detection. 1a edição. Hoboken: Wiley; 2012. p. 352.

Youssef A, Delpha C, Diallo D. An optimal fault detection threshold for early detection using Kullback–Leibler divergence for unknown distribution data. Signal Process. 2016 Mar 1;120:266–79.

Article  Google Scholar 

McKee M, Gugushvili A, Koltai J, Stuckler D. Are Populist Leaders Creating the Conditions for the Spread of COVID-19?; Comment on “A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties’ Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe”. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2020 Jul 14 [cited 2021 Mar 8];0. Available from: https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3856.html.

Burki T. COVID-19 in Latin America. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020 May 1;20(5):547–8.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kullback S, Leibler RA. On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Stat. 1951;22(1):79–86.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zeng J, Kruger U, Geluk J, Wang X, Xie L. Detecting abnormal situations using the Kullback–Leibler divergence. Automatica. 2014 Nov 1;50(11):2777–86.

Article  Google Scholar 

Li G, Wang Y. Differential Kullback-Leibler Divergence Based Anomaly Detection Scheme in Sensor Networks," 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology. 2012. p. 966–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIT.2012.197.

de la Torre C. Populism in Latin America [Internet]. Kaltwasser CR, Taggart P, Espejo PO, Ostiguy P, editors. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press; 2017 [cited 2021 Mar 8]. Available from: http://oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198803560-e-8.

Jošić H, Žmuk B. Assessing the quality of COVID-19 data: evidence from Newcomb-Benford law. FU Econ Org. 2021;18(2):135–56.

Google Scholar 

Castillo-Olea C, Conte-Galván R, Zuñiga C, Siono A, Huerta A, Bardhi O, et al. Early stage identification of COVID-19 patients in Mexico using machine learning: a case study for the Tijuana general hospital. Information. 2021 Dec;12(12):490.

Article  Google Scholar 

Manrique-Hernández EF, Moreno-Montoya J, Hurtado-Ortiz A, Prieto-Alvarado FE, Idrovo ÁJ. Performance of the Colombian surveillance system during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid evaluation of the first 50 days. Biomédica. 2020 Oct;40:96–103.

Article  Google Scholar 

Idrovo AJ, Manrique-Hernández EF. Data quality of Chinese surveillance of COVID-19: objective analysis based on WHO’s situation reports. Asia Pac. J. Public Health. 2020 May 1;32(4):165–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mathieu E, Ritchie H, Rodés-Guirao L, Appel C, Giattino C, Hasell J, et al. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). Our World in Data [Internet]. 2020 Mar 5 [cited 2022 Nov 9]; Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus.

Carmines E, Zeller R. Reliability and Validity Assessment [Internet]. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1979 [cited 2022 Nov 7]. Available from: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/reliability-and-validity-assessment.

Newcomb S. Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. Am. J. Math. 1881;4(1):39–40.

Article  Google Scholar 

Benford F. The law of anomalous numbers. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 1938;78(4):551–72.

Google Scholar 

Fewster RM. A simple explanation of Benford’s law. Am. Stat. 2009;63(1):26–32.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hill TP. Base-invariance implies Benford’s law. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1995;123(3):887–95.

Google Scholar 

Mir TA. The Benford law behavior of the religious activity data. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2014 Aug 15;408:1–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Diekmann A. Not the first digit! Using Benford’s law to detect fraudulent Scientif ic data. J. Appl. Stat. 2007 Apr 1;34(3):321–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Said T, Mohammed K. Detection of anomaly in socio-economic databases, by Benford probability law. 2020 IEEE 6th International Conference on Optimization and Applications (ICOA), 2020, pp. 1-4, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOA49421.2020.9094466.

Figueiredo Filho D, Silva L, Carvalho E. The forensics of fraud: evidence from the 2018 Brazilian presidential election. Forensic Sci. Int.: Synergy. 2022 Jan 1;5:100286.

Google Scholar 

Cerioli A, Barabesi L, Cerasa A, Menegatti M, Perrotta D. Newcomb–Benford law and the detection of frauds in international trade. PNAS. 2019 Jan 2;116(1):106–15.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Horton J, Krishna Kumar D, Wood A. Detecting academic fraud using Benford law: the case of professor James Hunton. Res. Policy. 2020 Oct 1;49(8):104084.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hutzler F, Richlan F, Leitner MC, Schuster S, Braun M, Hawelka S, Anticipating trajectories of exponential growth. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8(4):201574.

Druică E, Oancea B, Vâlsan C. Benford’s law and the limits of digit analysis. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 2018 Dec 1;31:75–82.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ausloos M, Castellano R, Cerqueti R. Regularities and discrepancies of credit default swaps: a data science approach through Benford’s law. Chaos, Solitons Fractals. 2016 Sep 1;90:8–17.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nandi DG, DRK S. Data Science Fundamentals and Practical Approaches. In: Understand Why Data Science Is the Next: BPB Publications; 2020. p. 572.

Google Scholar 

MacKay DJC, DJCM K. Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms: Cambridge University Press; 2003. p. 694.

Google Scholar 

Zhong J, Liu R, Chen P. Identifying critical state of complex diseases by single-sample Kullback–Leibler divergence. BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 28;21(1):87.

Article  Google Scholar 

Afgani M, Sinanovic S, Haas H. Anomaly detection using the Kullback-Leibler divergence metric. 1st International Symposium on Applied Sciences on Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL ‘08). 2008;1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISABEL.2008.4712573.

Zhou SK, Chellappa R. From sample similarity to ensemble similarity: probabilistic distance measures in reproducing kernel Hilbert space. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006 Jun;28(6):917–29.

Article  Google Scholar 

Inglada J. Change detection on SAR images by using a parametric estimation of the Kullback-Leibler divergence. In: IGARSS 2003 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477), 2003, pp. 4104-4106 vol.6, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2003.1295376.

Uçar A, Doğan CD. Defining cut point for Kullback-Leibler divergence to detect answer copying. Int. J. Assess. Tool. Educ. 2021 Mar 15;8(1):156–66.

Varga D. Analysis of Benford’s law for no-reference quality assessment of natural, screen-content, and synthetic images. Electronics. 2021 Jan;10(19):2378.

Article  Google Scholar 

Al-Bandawi H, Deng G. Blind image quality assessment based on Benford’s law. IET Image Process. 2018 Nov;12(11):1983–93.

Article  Google Scholar 

Taimori A, Razzazi F, Behrad A, Ahmadi A, Babaie-Zadeh M. A proper transform for Benford's Law and its application to double JPEG image forensics," 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT), 2012, pp. 000240-000244, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPIT.2012.6621294.

Cinelli C. benford.analysis: Benford Analysis for Data Validation and Forensic Analytics [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Sep 15]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=benford.analysis.

Joenssen DW, Muellerleile T. BenfordTests: Statistical Tests for Evaluating Conformity to Benford’s Law [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Feb 25]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BenfordTests.

Drost HG. Philentropy: information theory and distance quantification with R. JOSS. 2018 Jun 11;3(26):765.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kennedy AP, Yam SCP. On the authenticity of COVID-19 case figures. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 8;15(12):e0243123.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Neumayer E, Plümper T. Does ‘data fudging’ explain the autocratic advantage? Evidence from the gap between official Covid-19 mortality and excess mortality. SSM - Popul. Health. 2022 Sep 1;19:101247.

Article  Google Scholar 

Garcia PJ, Alarcón A, Bayer A, Buss P, Guerra G, Ribeiro H, et al. COVID-19 response in Latin America. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Nov;103(5):1765–72.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

DAM V. How limitations in data of health surveillance impact decision making in the Covid-19 pandemic. Saúde debate. 2020;44(spe4):206–18.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wei C, Lee CC, Hsu TC, Hsu WT, Chan CC, Chen SC, et al. Correlation of population mortality of COVID-19 and testing coverage: a comparison among 36 OECD countries. Epidemiol. Infect. 2020 Dec 28;149:e1.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Pitzer VE, Chitwood M, Havumaki J, Menzies NA, Perniciaro S, Warren JL, Weinberger DM, Cohen T. The impact of changes in diagnostic testing practices on estimates of COVID-19 transmission in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(9):1908–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab089.

Harris JE. Timely epidemic monitoring in the presence of reporting delays: anticipating the COVID-19 surge in new York City, September 2020. BMC Public Health. 2022 May 2;22(1):871.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lancet T. COVID-19 in Brazil: “So what?”. The Lancet. 2020 May;395(10235):1461.

Article  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif