記住我
Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
Nuzov N.B.a,b· Bhusal B.b· Henry K.R.a· Jiang F.a· Vu J.a,b· Rosenow J.M.c· Pilitsis J.G.d· Elahi B.e· Golestanirad L.a,baDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
bDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
cDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
dDepartment of Neurosciences & Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
eDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price. Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more Select* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication DetailsFirst-Page Preview
Received: May 05, 2022
Accepted: August 04, 2022
Published online: December 16, 2022
Number of Print Pages: 13
Number of Figures: 9
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 1011-6125 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0372 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/SFN
AbstractIntroduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a common treatment for a variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Recent studies have highlighted the role of neuroimaging in localizing the position of electrode contacts relative to target brain areas in order to optimize DBS programming. Among different imaging methods, postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely used for DBS electrode localization; however, the geometrical distortion induced by the lead limits its accuracy. In this work, we investigated to what degree the difference between the actual location of the lead’s tip and the location of the tip estimated from the MRI artifact varies depending on the MRI sequence parameters such as acquisition plane and phase encoding direction, as well as the lead’s extracranial configuration. Accordingly, an imaging technique to increase the accuracy of lead localization was devised and discussed. Methods: We designed and constructed an anthropomorphic phantom with an implanted DBS system following 18 clinically relevant configurations. The phantom was scanned at a Siemens 1.5 Tesla Aera scanner using a T1MPRAGE sequence optimized for clinical use and a T1TSE sequence optimized for research purposes. We varied slice acquisition plane and phase encoding direction and calculated the distance between the caudal tip of the DBS lead MRI artifact and the actual tip of the lead, as estimated from MRI reference markers. Results: Imaging parameters and lead configuration substantially altered the difference in the depth of the lead within its MRI artifact on the scale of several millimeters − with a difference as large as 4.99 mm. The actual tip of the DBS lead was found to be consistently more rostral than the tip estimated from the MR image artifact. The smallest difference between the tip of the DBS lead and the tip of the MRI artifact using the clinically relevant sequence (i.e., T1MPRAGE) was found with the sagittal acquisition plane and anterior-posterior phase encoding direction. Discussion/Conclusion: The actual tip of an implanted DBS lead is located up to several millimeters rostral to the tip of the lead’s artifact on postoperative MR images. This distance depends on the MRI sequence parameters and the DBS system’s extracranial trajectory. MRI parameters may be altered to improve this localization.
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
References Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P, Volkmann J, Schäfer H, Bötzel K, et al. A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. NEJM. 2006;355(9):896–908. Benabid AL. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13(6):696–706. Iorio-Morin C, Fomenko A, Kalia SK. Deep-brain stimulation for essential tremor and other tremor syndromes: a narrative review of current targets and clinical outcomes. Brain Sci. 2020;1010(12):925925. Zhang K, Bhatia S, Oh MY, Cohen D, Angle C, Whiting D. Long-term results of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(6):1271–6. Vidailhet M, Vercueil L, Houeto JL, Krystkowiak P, Benabid AL, Cornu P, et al. Bilateral deep-brain stimulation of the globus pallidus in primary generalized dystonia. NEJM. 2005;352(5):459–67. Loher TJ, Capelle HH, Kaelin-Lang A, Weber S, Weigel R, Burgunder JM, et al. Deep brain stimulation for dystonia: outcome at long-term follow-up. J Neurol. 2008;255(6):881–4. Perez-Malagon CD, Lopez-Gonzalez MA. Epilepsy and deep brain stimulation of anterior thalamic nucleus. Cureus. 2021;13(9). Bouwens van der Vlis TAM, Schijns OEMG, Schaper FLWVJ, Hoogland G, Kubben P, Wagner L, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus for drug-resistant epilepsy. Neurosurg Rev. 2019;42(2):287–96. Baldermann JC, Melzer C, Zapf A, Kohl S, Timmermann L, Tittgemeyer M, et al. Connectivity profile predictive of effective deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;85(9):735–43. De Koning PP, Figee M, Van Den Munckhof P, Schuurman PR, Denys D. Current status of deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a clinical review of different targets. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2011;13(4):274–82. Greenberg BD, Gabriels LA, Malone DA, Rezai AR, Friehs GM, Okun MS, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the ventral internal capsule/ventral striatum for obsessive-compulsive disorder: worldwide experience. Mol Psychiatry. 2010;15(1):64–79. Schlaepfer TE, Bewernick BH. Deep brain stimulation for major depression. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:235–43. Malone DA, Dougherty DD, Rezai AR, Carpenter LL, Friehs GM, Eskandar EN, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65(4):267–75. Luo Y, Sun Y, Tian X, Zheng X, Wang X, Li W, et al. Deep brain stimulation for alzheimer’s disease: stimulation parameters and potential mechanisms of action. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:619543. Lv Q, Du A, Wei W, Li Y, Liu G, Wang XP. Deep brain stimulation: a potential treatment for dementia in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD). Front Neurosci. 2018;12:360. Follett KA, Weaver FM, Stern M, Hur K, Harris CL, Luo P, et al. Pallidal versus subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2077–91. Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Obeso JA, Lang AE, Houeto JL, Pollak P, Rehncrona S, et al. Bilateral deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: a multicentre study with 4 years follow-up. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 10):2240–9. Welter ML, Schüpbach M, Czernecki V, Karachi C, Fernandez-Vidal S, Golmard JL, et al. Optimal target localization for subthalamic stimulation in patients with Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2014;82(15):1352–61. Wodarg F, Herzog J, Reese R, Falk D, Pinsker MO, Steigerwald F, et al. Stimulation site within the MRI-defined STN predicts postoperative motor outcome. Mov Disord. 2012;27(7):874–9. Jiang F, Elahi B, Saxena M, Telkes I, Dimarzio M, Pilitsis JG, et al. Patient-specific modeling of the volume of tissue activated (VTA) is associated with clinical outcome of DBS in patients with an obsessive-compulsive disorder. Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS. 2021:5889–92. McIntyre CC, Foutz TJ. Computational modeling of deep brain stimulation. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:55–61. McIntyre CC, Mori S, Sherman DL, Thakor NV, Vitek JL. Electric field and stimulating influence generated by deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(3):589–95. Volkmann J, Herzog J, Kopper F, Deuschl G. Introduction to the programming of deep brain stimulators. Mov Disord. 2002;17(S3):S181–7. Bhusal B, Stockmann J, Guerin B, Mareyam A, Kirsch J, Wald LL, et al. Safety and image quality at 7T MRI for deep brain stimulation systems: ex vivo study with lead-only and full-systems. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0257077. Bhusal B, Keil B, Rosenow J, Kazemivalipour E, Golestanirad L. Patient’s body composition can significantly affect RF power deposition in the tissue around DBS implants: ramifications for lead management strategies and MRI field-shaping techniques. Phys Med Biol. 2021(1):015008. Golestanirad L, Keil B, Angelone LM, Bonmassar G, Mareyam A, Wald LL. Feasibility of using linearly polarized rotating birdcage transmitters and close-fitting receive arrays in MRI to reduce SAR in the vicinity of deep brain simulation implants. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(4):1701–12. Kazemivalipour E, Bhusal B, Vu J, Lin S, Nguyen BT, Kirsch J, et al. Vertical open-bore MRI scanners generate significantly less radiofrequency heating around implanted leads: a study of deep brain stimulation implants in 1.2T OASIS scanners versus 1.5T horizontal systems. Magn Reson Med. 2021;86(3):1560–72. Boutet A, Chow CT, Narang K, Elias GJB, Neudorfer C, Germann J, et al. Improving safety of MRI in patients with deep brain stimulation devices. Radiology. 2020;296(2):250–62. Kazemivalipour E, Keil B, Vali A, Rajan S, Elahi B, Atalar E, et al. Reconfigurable MRI technology for low-SAR imaging of deep brain stimulation at 3T: application in bilateral leads, fully-implanted systems, and surgically modified lead trajectories. Neuroimage. 2019;199:18–29. Lozano CS, Ranjan M, Boutet A, Xu DS, Kucharczyk W, Fasano A, et al. Imaging alone versus microelectrode recording-guided targeting of the STN in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosurg. 2019;130(6):1847–52. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys. 1996;23(6):815–50. Pinsker MO, Herzog J, Falk D, Volkmann J, Deuschl G, Mehdorn M. Accuracy and distortion of deep brain stimulation electrodes on postoperative MRI and CT. Zentralbl Neurochir. 2008;69(3):144–7. Pollo C, Villemure JG, Vingerhoets F, Ghika J, Maeder P, Meuli R, et al. Magnetic resonance artifact induced by the electrode Activa 3389: an in vitro and in vivo study. Acta Neurochir. 2004;146(2):161–4. Lee JY, Kim JW, Lee JY, Lim YH, Kim C, Kim DG, et al. Is MRI a reliable tool to locate the electrode after deep brain stimulation surgery? Comparison study of CT and MRI for the localization of electrodes after DBS. Acta Neurochir. 2010;152(12):2029–36. Saleh C, Dooms G, Berthold C, Hertel F. Post-operative imaging in deep brain stimulation: a controversial issue. Neuroradiol J. 2016;29(4):244–9. Kremer NI, Oterdoom DLM, van Laar PJ, Piña-Fuentes D, van Laar T, Drost G, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography in deep brain stimulation: a prospective noninferiority study. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interf. 2019;22(4):472–7. Bot M, Van Den Munckhof P, Bakay R, Stebbins G, Verhagen Metman L. Accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography during deep brain stimulation procedures: comparison with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2017;95(3):183–8. Mirzadeh Z, Chapple K, Lambert M, Dhall R, Ponce FA. Validation of CT-MRI fusion for intraoperative assessment of stereotactic accuracy in DBS surgery. Mov Disord. 2014;29(14):1788–95. Thani NB, Bala A, Swann GB, Lind CRP. Accuracy of postoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance image fusion for assessing deep brain stimulation electrodes. Neurosurgery. 2011;69(1):207–14; discussion 214. Girgis F, Zarabi H, Said M, Zhang L, Shahlaie K, Saez I. Comparison of intraoperative computed tomography scan with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging for determining deep brain stimulation electrode coordinates. World Neurosurg. 2020;138:e330–5. Sauner D, Runge M, Poggenborg J, Maarouf M, Sturm V, Treuer H, et al. Multimodal localization of electrodes in deep brain stimulation: comparison of stereotactic ct and mri with teleradiography. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2010;88(4):253–8. Engelhardt J, Guehl D, Damon-Perrière N, Branchard O, Burbaud P, Cuny E. Localization of deep brain stimulation electrode by image registration is software dependent: a comparative study between four widely used software programs. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2018;96(6):364–9. Geevarghese R, Ogorman Tuura R, Lumsden DE, Samuel M, Ashkan K. Registration accuracy of ct/mri fusion for localisation of deep brain stimulation electrode position: an imaging study and systematic review. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2016;94(3):159–63. Hunsche S, Sauner D, Maarouf M, Poggenborg J, Lackner K, Sturm V, et al. Intraoperative X-ray detection and MRI-based quantification of brain shift effects subsequent to implantation of the first electrode in bilateral implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2009;87(5):322–9. Pallavaram S, Dawant BM, Remple MS, Neimat JS, Kao C, Konrad PE, et al. Effect of brain shift on the creation of functional atlases for deep brain stimulation surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010;5(3):221–8. Halpern CH, Danish SF, Baltuch GH, Jaggi JL. Brain shift during deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson’s disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2008;86(1):37–43. Niederer J, Patriat R, Rosenberg O, Palnitkar T, Darrow D, Park MC, et al. Factors influencing electrode position and bending of the proximal lead in deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2020;98(5):300–12. Morishita T, Hilliard JD, Okun MS, Neal D, Nestor KA, Peace D, et al. Postoperative lead migration in deep brain stimulation surgery: Incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0183711. Bhusal B, Nguyen BT, Sanpitak PP, Vu J, Elahi B, Rosenow J, et al. Effect of device configuration and patient’s body composition on the RF heating and nonsusceptibility artifact of deep brain stimulation implants during MRI at 1.5T and 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;53(2):599–610. Vu J, Bhusal B, Rosenow J, Pilitsis J, Golestanirad L. Modifying surgical implantation of deep brain stimulation leads significantly reduces RF-induced heating during 3 T MRI. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021;2021:4978–81. Sanpitak P, Bhusal B, Nguyen BT, Vu J, Chow K, Bi X, et al. On the accuracy of Tier 4 simulations to predict RF heating of wire implants during magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021;2021:4982–5. Golestanirad L, Angelone LM, Iacono MI, Katnani H, Wald LL, Bonmassar G. Local SAR near deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes at 64 and 127 MHz: a simulation study of the effect of extracranial loops. Magn Reson Med. 2017;78(4):1558–65. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, et al. 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network [computer program on the internet]. Version 4.11. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1323–41. Available from: https://www.slicer.org/. McNeel R, others . Seattle, WA: Robert McNeel & amp, Associates; 2010. Rhinoceros 3D [computer program on the Internet]. Version 7.0. Available from: https://www.rhino3d.com/. Microsoft Excel [computer program on the Internet]. Version 16.59. Microsoft Corporation; 2018. Available from: https://office.microsoft.com/excel R Core Team. R. A language and environment for statistical computing [computer program on the Internet]. Version 4.1.3. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/. RStudio Team. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC; 2020. RStudio: Integrated Development for R [computer program on the Internet]. Version 2202.02.1. Available from: http://www.rstudio.com/. Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–60. He C, Zhang F, Li L, Jiang C, Li L. Measurement of lead localization accuracy based on magnetic resonance imaging. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:632822. Hemm S, Coste J, Gabrillargues J, Ouchchane L, Sarry L, Caire F, et al. Contact position analysis of deep brain stimulation electrodes on post-operative CT images. Acta Neurochir. 2009;151(7):823–9; discussion 829. Hyam JA, Akram H, Foltynie T, Limousin P, Hariz M, Zrinzo L. What you see is what you get: lead location within deep brain structures is accurately depicted by stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery. 2015;11(Suppl 3):412–9; discussion 419. Ellenbogen JR, Tuura R, Ashkan K, Ellenbogen J. Localisation of DBS electrodes post-implantation, to CT or MRI? Which is the best option?. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2018;96(5):347–8. Li Y, Buch S, He N, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Wang T, et al. Imaging patients pre and post deep brain stimulation: Localization of the electrodes and their targets. Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;75:34–44. Golestanirad L, Kirsch J, Bonmassar G, Downs S, Elahi B, Martin A, et al. RF-induced heating in tissue near bilateral DBS implants during MRI at 1.5 T and 3T: the role of surgical lead management. Neuroimage. 2019;184:566–76. McElcheran CE, Yang B, Anderson KJT, Golestanirad L, Graham SJ. Parallel radiofrequency transmission at 3 tesla to improve safety in bilateral implanted wires in a heterogeneous model. Magn Reson Med. 2017;78(6):2406–15. Vu J, Nguyen BT, Bhusal B, Baraboo J, Rosenow J, Bagci U, et al. Machine learning-based prediction of MRI-induced power absorption in the tissue in patients with simplified deep brain stimulation lead models. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat. 2021;63(5):1757–66. Richter EO, Hoque T, Halliday W, Lozano AM, Saint-Cyr JA. Determining the position and size of the subthalamic nucleus based on magnetic resonance imaging results in patients with advanced Parkinson disease. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(3):541–6. Horn A. The impact of modern-day neuroimaging on the field of deep brain stimulation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2019;32(4):511–20. Golestanirad L, Angelone LM, Kirsch J, Downs S, Keil B, Bonmassar G, et al. Reducing RF-induced Heating near Implanted Leads through High-Dielectric Capacitive Bleeding of Current (CBLOC). IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2019;67(3):1265–73. Graf H, Lauer UA, Berger A, Schick F. RF artifacts caused by metallic implants or instruments which get more prominent at 3 T: an in vitro study. Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;23(3):493–9. Article / Publication DetailsFirst-Page Preview
Received: May 05, 2022
Accepted: August 04, 2022
Published online: December 16, 2022
Number of Print Pages: 13
Number of Figures: 9
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 1011-6125 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0372 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/SFN
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
留言 (0)