How Could Physical Activity Reduce Inflammation and Inflammatory Gene Expression in Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Exposure to adverse life events and acute physical injury such as that caused by trauma or infection trigger activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in response to direct signaling from the brain.1-3 This instantly results in enhanced production of adrenaline and noradrenaline by the adrenal glands. Within minutes, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is stimulated, leading to increased adrenal gland cortisol secretion. The SNS and HPA axis comprise the main components of the stress system. Stress system activation also involves reduced growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), androgen and thyroid hormone production, decreased vagal nerve activity, and increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activation. The purpose of these neuroendocrine changes is to orchestrate the release of energy from its stores including the liver, adipose tissue, and muscle in the form of glucose, free fatty acids, and amino acids, and provide it to the activated immune system. This engenders an adequate inflammatory response and its subsequent resolution to reestablish homeostasis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a prototypic chronic inflammatory disease. Whereas the stress system is also activated in response to RA activity, it does not succeed in resolving the inflammatory process and is therefore unable to restore homeostasis.4 Even though cortisol levels are normal or slightly elevated in patients with RA who have not been treated with exogenous glucocorticoids (GCs), these levels appear to be too low to fully suppress the inflammatory process. This low GC level is thought to be due to cytokine-mediated desensitization of the HPA axis in RA. Additionally, some patients with RA experience GC resistance that may, at least in part, be genetically mediated. This seemingly inadequate cortisol response to RA-induced chronic inflammation may, however, serve to protect patients against persistent hypercortisolemia-induced sepsis. Still, HPA axis sensitivity to stressors other than inflammation, such as hypoglycemia stress, appears to be preserved in RA.

Besides the failure of the stress system to resolve chronic inflammation, its ongoing activation actually perpetuates inflammation and causes a catabolic state as well as metabolic abnormalities that contribute to enhanced cardiovascular risk in RA. This issue was elegantly reviewed in a report by Straub.5

In addition to alterations in cortisol production and sensitivity, other morphological and hormonal changes that contribute to ongoing inflammation in RA comprise loss of sympathetic nerve fibers in inflamed tissue, impaired activity of the vagus nerve, reduced androgen6 and IGF-1 production, insulin7 and IGF-1 resistance, increased RAAS activation, and low triiodothyronine levels (summarized in Table 1). In addition to excessive cytokine production, an increased insulin resistance in RA can be also caused by hypoandrogenism, excessive RAAS activation, and low thyroid hormone concentrations.8 Importantly, whereas the liver, adipose tissue, and muscle become insulin-resistant, this does not apply to leukocytes.5 Apart from insulin resistance and its related effects on lipid and glucose metabolism, another frequent metabolic abnormality in RA is hypertension, which can be mediated by SNS overactivity and increased RAAS activation. Increased cytokine production and GC therapy are known to mediate rheumatoid cachexia.9 With regard to neuroendocrine abnormalities, insulin and IGF-1 resistance, hypoandrogenism, endogenous hypercortisolemia, increased SNS activity, and RAAS activation are also each implicated in rheumatoid cachexia.5

Table 1.

Neuroendocrine alterations in RA and potential corrective effects of physical activity.

Along with comorbidities, including catabolism with muscle wasting and cardiometabolic abnormalities, patients with RA also experience chronic pain, decreased functional capacity, and fatigue.10 It is therefore not surprising that most patients with RA do not perform regular physical activity. Yet, regular physical activity not only protects against many chronic diseases but also improves their outcomes.11

In this issue of The Journal of Rheumatology, Patterson and colleagues12 report that physical activity is associated with reduced systemic inflammatory gene expression in RA. The authors assessed physical activity by actigraphy and performed RNA sequencing in 35 patients with RA. Physical activity and gene expression were compared between patients in the greatest vs lowest physical activity tertiles, in age-, sex-, race-, and ethnicity-adjusted analyses. Notably, none of the participants performed vigorous physical activity and the most vs least active groups spent an average of only 4.3 hours per day vs 1.1 hours per day, in moderate activity. The median gene count across all samples was 5.8 × 105. At an adjusted P value of < 0.1, 767 genes were differentially expressed in high compared to low physical activity patients. Compared to patients with RA in the low physical activity tertile, the participants in the high physical activity tertile experienced a dose-dependent downregulation of a range of signaling pathways that are implicated in the pathogenesis of RA. These included CD40, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM-1), interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-8, Toll-like receptor (TLR), and interferon (IFN) signaling. Upstream cytokine activation state analysis predicted reduced activation of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IFN, and increased erythropoietin activation in the most active group. These findings were mostly consistent upon additional adjustment for disease activity as evaluated by the RA Disease Activity Index and physical function as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function scale. Limitations of this investigation include its small size and the lack of physician evaluation and joint counts upon assessing disease activity, as well as lack of data on joint damage. Despite these shortcomings, this study, as the authors conclude, does provide mechanistic evidence in support of a disease-modifying effect induced by physical activity.

Do the reported findings by Patterson and colleagues relate to recently reported evidence that deals with the effects of physical activity on chronic inflammation–related outcomes in RA?12 In a large 2-year randomized controlled trial, de Jong and colleagues13 compared the effects of high-intensity weight-bearing exercise (2 sessions of 1.25 hours per week) to those of physical therapy (usual care) on disease outcomes in RA. High-intensity weight-bearing exercise improved physical fitness, physical capacity, and emotional status. Disease activity improved slightly but to the same extent in both participating groups, whereas the erythrocyte sedimentation rate did not change. Despite the lack of an apparent effect on disease activity, high-intensity weight-bearing exercise reduced the progression of radiographic damage, particularly in the feet and, to a lesser extent, in the hands. These findings suggest that physical activity can have a disease-modifying effect in RA. Other studies have shown that aerobic and/or resistance exercise programs do not change or improve disease activity and levels of acute-phase reactants and cytokines including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6 and TNF-α.10 High-intensity interval walk training reduced proinflammatory monocyte numbers and their cell surface TLR expression in RA.14 Equally important in the context of chronic inflammation–induced comorbidities, aerobic and/or resistance exercises were reported to improve blood pressure, lipid profiles, insulin resistance, endothelial function, autonomic function, muscle mass and strength, excess adiposity, and self-reported fatigue and quality of life in RA.10

Given that patients in the Patterson study performed only moderate physical activity, a striking finding was the extent to which inflammatory signaling pathways were downregulated.12 In the general population, regular bouts of moderate and vigorous physical activity cause transient increases in neutrophils, selective lymphocyte subsets, and antiinflammatory cytokines that, over time, enhance immunosurveillance and lower systemic inflammation.11 Physically active and fit persons experience lower white blood cell counts and cytokines including IL-6 and IL-18. This is only partly explained by lower levels of abdominal obesity. Proposed mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of physical activity on inflammation include reduction in visceral fat mass with decreased macrophage infiltration, release of IL-6 from contracting muscles, stress system activation, downregulation of TLRs, reduced numbers of proinflammatory monocytes, and increased circulating numbers of regulatory T cells.3,15

How could physical activity reduce inflammation and inflammatory gene expression in RA? As alluded to above, the HPA axis desensitization in RA is stimulus-specific.4 Hence, it would be expected that regular physical activity can improve chronic cytokine-mediated inadequate cortisol production in relation to inflammation among patients with RA. Notably, in contrast to trained individuals, physically unfit persons experience a significant increase in cortisol production at the end of even a low-intensity exercise session of 15 minutes.16 Physical training can also increase the sensitivity of monocytes to GCs during bouts of exercise.17 Regular physical activity improves plasticity in the neural networks that regulate SNS activity.18 This results not only in reduced SNS activity but also in increased vagal nerve activity.19 A recent systematic review revealed that regular physical activity augments testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, growth hormone, and IGF-1 levels.20 Exercise training can reduce RAAS activation.21 The beneficial effects of exercise training on insulin resistance are well recognized and, as mentioned previously, have also been documented previously in patients with RA.10 Taken together, it appears likely that regular physical activity can reduce chronic inflammation by favorably affecting the different components of the dysfunctional stress system in patients with RA. These effects are also summarized in Table 1.

Data on the effects of physical activity on inflammatory gene expression as reported in the Patterson study12 are in line with findings in different non-RA investigations. As given in Table 2, physical activity has been reported to reduce circulating soluble CD40 ligand concentrations in athletes, skeletal muscle STAT3 signaling in tumor-bearing mice, IFN-γ and IL-17 in serum and the supernatant of peripheral blood lymphocytes of women with multiple sclerosis, serum IL-8 concentrations in lean and overweight/obese individuals, and TLR levels. Improved functioning of the stress system upon physical activity could at least partly account for decreased inflammatory gene expression in RA. For example, as shown in Table 3, GCs can have favorable effects on CD40 ligand-induced nuclear factor kappa B (NF-Embedded ImageEmbedded ImageB) activation, TREM-1, IFN and TLR signaling, and IL-8 production. Also, GCs can induce apoptosis of proinflammatory monocytes by inhibiting ERK activity, and expand T regulatory cells in patients with autoimmune diseases.

Table 2.

Selected reported effects of physical activity on inflammation in non-RA studies.

Table 3.

Selected reported effects of GCs on inflammation in non-RA studies.

In the Patterson study,12 the mean (SD) body mass index was similar at 29.0 (6.8) kg/m2 vs 28.6 (4.1) kg/m2 in the most vs least physically active patients with RA. However, measures of abdominal obesity were not made. In this regard, excess and dysfunctional visceral adiposity is consistently associated with systemic inflammation.15 This is mediated by production of proinflammatory cytokines and aberrant adipokine metabolism. A reduction in visceral fat mass is strongly implicated in exercise-mediated reduction of systemic inflammation. Whether the same applies in patients with RA needs further study.

In RA, immunocyte-derived IL-6 is known for its pronounced proinflammatory and catabolic effects.22 Treatment with the IL-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab (TCZ) in RA is highly effective to control disease activity, increase lean mass, improve fat distribution, and reduce insulin resistance.22,23 In this regard, an intriguing and important recent development in exercise physiology is the discovery that skeletal muscle represents an endocrine organ.10,22 In response to exercise, skeletal muscle produces several hundreds of myokines, which are peptides that exert autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine effects. An intensively investigated myokine is, in fact, IL-6. The effects of IL-6 on inflammation and metabolism are strongly context-dependent.10,22 Both the upward and downstream signaling pathways for IL-6 differ markedly between myocytes and immunocytes. In contrast to exercise in myocytes, TNF-α and IL-1 precede IL-6 production in immunocytes. Myocyte-derived IL-6 upon exercise induces the production of IL-1 receptor antagonist and IL-10, which are main antiinflammatory cytokines. Myocyte-derived IL-6 can also account for exercise-mediated increased cortisol production in response to exercise. TCZ abolishes the exercise-induced loss of visceral and cardiac fat as well as the increase in left ventricular mass among abdominally obese adults. It follows that skeletal muscle–derived IL-6 in response to exercise has antiinflammatory and anabolic effects.10,22

Overall, intense and particularly prolonged exercise involving a substantial muscle mass is required to trigger markedly increased myocyte-induced IL-6 production.24 Hence, it appears unlikely that this mechanism played an important role in the observations made in the Patterson study12 as the respective participants led a mostly sedentary life. Nevertheless, whether treatment with TCZ can affect potential vigorous and high-intensity exercise-induced antiinflammatory and beneficial metabolic effects in RA requires further investigation.

In conclusion, physical activity is distinctly associated with reduced inflammatory gene expression in RA. We hypothesize that this effect can be mediated by favorable influences of physical activity on the dysfunctional stress system components in RA. Encouraging adequate physical activity should be consistently included in RA management strategies.25

Footnotes

The work was supported by the South African National Research Foundation and Medical Research Council.

The authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to this article.

See Exercise and inflammation in RA, page 1320

Copyright © 2022 by the Journal of Rheumatology

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif